Unsteady state flux response: A method to determine the nature of the solute and gel layer in membrane filtration

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 188, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 9-20

  Karode, Sandeep K ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Concentration polarization; Gel; Model; Osmotic pressure; Ultrafiltration; Unsteady state

Indexed keywords

FILTRATION; LIQUID MEMBRANES; PRESSURE;

PERMEATE FLUX;

GELS;

UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

GEL; MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY; ULTRAFILTRATION;

CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); FLOW; GEL; HYDRODYNAMICS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEASUREMENT; MEMBRANE FILTER; MODEL; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY; SOLUTE; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY; STEADY STATE; TECHNIQUE; TIME; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 0035973431     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00644-X     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. van Oers C.W., Vorstman M.A.G., Muijselaar W.G.H.M., Kerkhof P.J.A.M. Unsteady-state flux behaviour in relation to the presence of a gel layer. J. Membr. Sci. 73:1992;231-246.
2. Vilker V.L., Colton C.K., Smith K.A. The osmotic pressure of concentrated protein solutions: effect of concentration and pH in saline solutions of bovine serum albumin. J. Coll. Int. Sci. 79(2):1981;548-566.
3. Opong W.S., Zydney A.L. Diffusive and convective protein transport through asymmetric membranes. AIChE J. 37(10):1991;1497-1510.
4. Karode S.K., Courtois T., Mietton-Peuchot M., Gupta B.B. Protein ultrafiltration: an explanation for negative rejection. J. Membr. Sci. 168:2000;75-85.
5. Hamachi M., Mietton-Peuchot M. Experimental investigations of cake characteristics in crossflow microfiltration. Chem. Eng. Sci. 54:1999;4023-4030.
6. Redkar S., Kuberkar V., Davis R.H. Modeling of concentration polarization and depolarization with high frequency backpulsing. J. Membr. Sci. 121(2):1996;229-242.