Diafiltration of Eucalyptus wood autohydrolysis liquors: Mathematical modeling

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 346, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 98-104

  Gonzalez Munoz M J ^a,b   Parajo J C ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIGO   (Spain)

^b CITI Tecnopole   (Spain)

Author keywords

Autohydrolysis liquors; Diafiltration; Mathematical modeling; Nanofiltration

Indexed keywords

AQUEOUS PROCESSING; AUTOHYDROLYSIS; DIAFILTRATION; EUCALYPTUS WOOD; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; MATHEMATICAL MODELING; NON-VOLATILE COMPOUNDS; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; QUANTITATIVE INTERPRETATION; SERIES RESISTANCES;

CERAMIC MEMBRANES; GLUCOSE; HYDROLYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OLIGOSACCHARIDES; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

NANOFILTRATION;

MONOSACCHARIDE; OLIGOSACCHARIDE; VOLATILE AGENT;

ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAFILTRATION; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; EUCALYPTUS; FLOW RATE; HYDROLYSIS; LIQUID; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEMBRANE FILTER; NANOFILTRATION; NONHUMAN; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; VISCOSITY; WOOD; ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); FLOW KINETICS;

EID: 71249101960     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.09.023     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Goldsmith R.L. Macromolecular ultrafiltration with microporous membranes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 10 (1971) 113-120
2. Nikolova J.D., and Islam M.A. Contribution of adsorbed layer resistance to the flux-decline in an ultrafiltration process. J. Membr. Sci. 146 (1998) 105-111
3. Ko M.K., Pellegrino J.J., Nassimbene R., and Marko P. Characterization of the adsorption-fouling layer using globular proteins on ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 76 (1993) 101-120
4. van Oers C.W., Vorstman M.A.G., Mu{eng}selaar W.G.H.M., and Kerkhof P.J.A.M. Unsteady-state flux behaviour in relation to the presence of a gel layer. J. Membr. Sci. 73 (1992) 231-246
5. Van der Bruggen B., and Vandecasteele C. Flux decline during nanofiltration of organic components in aqueous solution. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35 (2001) 3535-3540
6. 4 scale formation mechanism in various nanofiltration modules. J. Membr. Sci. 163 (1999) 63-74
7. Hoek E.M.V., and Elimelech M. Cake-enhanced concentration polarization: a new fouling mechanism for salt-rejecting membranes. Environ. Sci., Technol. 37 (2003) 5581-5588
8. Elimelech M., and Bhattacharjee S. A novel approach for modelling concentration polarization in crossflow membrane filtration based on the equivalence of osmotic pressure model and filtration theory. J. Membr. Sci. 145 (1998) 223-241
9. Karode S.K. Unsteady state flux response: a method to determine the nature of the solute and gel layer in membrane filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 188 (2001) 9-20
10. Mattaraj S., Jarusutthirak C., and Jiraratananon R. A combined osmotic pressure and cake filtration model for crossflow nanofiltration of natural organic matter. J. Membr. Sci. 322 (2008) 475-483
11. Contreras A.E., Kim A., and Li Q. Combined fouling of nanofiltration membranes: mechanisms and effect of organic matter. J. Membr. Sci. 327 (2009) 87-95
12. Chen V., Fane A.G., Madaeni S., and Wenten I.G. Particle deposition during membrane filtration of colloids: transition between concentration polarization and cake formation. J. Membr. Sci. 125 (1997) 109-122
13. Bhattacharjee C., and Datta S. Numerical simulation of continuous stirred ultrafiltration process: an approach based on moving boundary layer concept. Sep. Sci. Technol. 38 (2003) 1749-1772
14. Sethi S., and Wiesner M.R. Modeling of transient permeate flux in cross-flow membrane filtration incorporating multiple particle transport mechanisms. J. Membr. Sci. 136 (1997) 191-205
15. Song L. Permeate flux in crossflow ultrafiltration under intermediate pressures. J. Colloid Int. Sci. 214 (1999) 251-263
16. Wang L., and Song L. Flux decline in crossflow microfiltration and ultrafiltration: experimental verification of fouling dynamics. J. Membr. Sci. 160 (1999) 41-50
17. Choi S.-W., Yoon J.-Y., Haam S., Jung J.-K., Kim J.-H., and Kim W.-S. Modeling of the permeate flux during microfiltration of BSA-adsorbed microspheres in a stirred cell. J. Colloid Int. Sci. 228 (2000) 270-278
18. Carrère H., Blaszkow F., and Roux de Balmann H. Modelling the clarification of lactic acid fermentation broths by cross-flow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 186 (2001) 219-230
19. Srebnik S. Polymer adsorption on multicomponent surfaces with relevance to membrane fouling. Chem. Eng. Sci. 58 (2003) 5291-5298
20. Furukawa T., Kokubo K., Nakamura K., and Matsumoto K. Modeling of the permeate flux decline during MF and UF cross-flow filtration of soy sauce lees. J. Membr. Sci. 322 (2008) 491-502
21. Williams M.E., Hestekin J.A., Smothers C.N., and Bhattacharyya D. Separation of organic pollutants by reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes: mathematical models and experimental verification. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 38 (1999) 3683-3695
22. Karode S.K. A predictive model for ultrafiltration: combination of osmotic pressure model and irreversible thermodynamics. Sep. Sci. Technol. 36 (2001) 2659-2676
23. Braeken L., Van der Bruggen B., and Vandecasteele C. Flux decline in nanofiltration due to adsorption of dissolved organic compounds: model prediction of time dependency. J. Phys. Chem. B 110 (2006) 2957-2962
24. Bolton G., LaCasse D., and Kuriyel R. Combined models of membrane fouling: development and application to microfiltration and ultrafiltration of biological fluids. J. Membr. Sci. 277 (2006) 75-84
25. de Bruijn J.P.F., Salazar F.N., and Bórquez R. Membrane blocking in ultrafiltration. A new approach to fouling. Trans IChemE 83 C3 (2005) 211-219
26. Duarte R.M.B.O., Santos E.B.H., and Duarte A.C. Comparison between diafiltration and concentration operation modes for the determination of permeation coefficients of humic substances through ultrafiltration membranes. Anal. Chim. Acta 442 (2001) 155-164
27. Pastagia K.M., Chakraborty S., DasGupta S., Basu J.K., and De S. Prediction of permeate flux and concentration of two-component dye mixture in batch nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 218 (2003) 195-210
28. Kovács Z., Discacciati M., and Samhaber W. Modeling of batch and semi-batch membrane filtration processes. J. Membr. Sci. 327 (2009) 164-173
29. Prabhakar R., DasGupta S., and De S. Simultaneous prediction of flux and retention for osmotic pressure controlled turbulent cross flow ultrafiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 18 (2000) 13-24
30. Combe C., Guizard C., Aimar P., and Sanchez V. Experimental determination of four characteristics used to predict the retention of a ceramic nanofiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 129 (1997) 147-160
31. Jönsson A.S., Jönsson B., and Byhlin H. A concentration polarization model for the ultrafiltration of non-ionic surfactants. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 304 (2006) 191-199
32. Harriott P., and Hamilton R.M. Solid-liquid mass transfer in turbulent pipe flow. Chem. Eng. Sci. 20 (1965) 1073-1078
33. Wiley D.E., Fell C.J.D., and Fane A.G. Optimisation of membrane module design for brackish water desalination. Desalination 52 (1985) 249-265
34. Mochizuki S., and Zydney A.L. Dextran transport through asymmetric ultrafiltration membranes: comparison with hydrodynamic models. J. Membr. Sci. 68 (1992) 21-41
35. 5 from aqueous solutions. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 55 (1999) 1395-1405
36. 2 surfaces in solution. Langmuir 24 (2008) 10145-10154
37. San-Miguel M.A., and Rodger P.M. The effect of corrosion inhibitor films on deposition of wax to metal oxide surfaces. J. Mol. Struct. (TheoChem) 506 (2000) 263-272
38. Blumenkrantz N., and Asboe-Hansen G. New method for quantitative determination of uronic acids. Anal. Biochem. 54 (1973) 484-489
39. González-Muñoz M.J., Domínguez H., and Parajó J.C. Depolymerization of xylan-derived products in an enzymatic membrane reactor. J. Membr. Sci. 320 (2008) 224-231
40. Bui V., and Nguyen M.H. Prediction of viscosity of glucose and calcium chloride solutions. J. Food Eng. 62 (2004) 345-349