Standards of Best Practice: Simulation Standard VII: Participant Assessment and Evaluation

Clinical Simulation in Nursing

Volumn 9, Issue 6 SUPPL, 2013, Pages

  Sando, Carol R ^a   Coggins, Rita M ^b   Meakim, Colleen ^c   Franklin, Ashley E ^d   Gloe, Donna ^e   Boese, Teri ^f   Decker, Sharon ^g   Lioce, Lori ^h   Borum, Jimmie C ⁱ  

^a DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^g TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN HUNTSVILLE   (United States)

ⁱ TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Formative assessment; Guideline; High stakes evaluation; Simulation; Standard; Summative evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879167039     PISSN: 18761399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecns.2013.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Adamson K.A., Jeffries P.R., Rogers K.J. Evaluation: Acritical step in simulation practice and research. Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to evaluation 2012, 131-161. NLN, New York. 2nd ed. P. Jeffries (Ed.).
2. Aschenbrenner D.S., Milgrom L.B., Settles J. Designing simulation scenarios to promote learning. Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to evaluation 2012, 43-74. NLN, New York. 2nd ed. P.R. Jeffries (Ed.).
3. Billings D., Halstead J. Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty 2012, Elsevier, St. Louis. 4th ed.
4. Mastery learning: Theory and practice 1971, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York. J.H. Block (Ed.).
5. Chesser A., Cameron H., Evans P., Cleland J., Boursicot K., Mires G. Sources of variation in performance on a shared OSCE station across four UK medical schools. Medical Education 2009, 43:526-532.
6. Harasym P.H., Woloschuk W., Cunning L. Undesired variance due to examiner stringency/leniency effect in communication skill scores assessed in OSCEs. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice 2008, 13:617-632.
7. Humphrey-Murto S., Smee S., Touchie C., Wood T.J., Blackmore D.E. A comparison of physician examiners and trained assessors in a high-stakes OSCE setting. Academic Medicine 2005, 80:S59-S62.
8. Jefferies A., Simmons B., Regehr G. The effect of familiarity on examiner OSCE scores. Medical Education 2007, 41:888-891.
9. Jeffries P.R., Rogers K.J. Theoretical framework for simulation design. Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to evaluation 2012, 25-42. NLN, New York. 2nd ed. P. Jeffries (Ed.).
10. Kardong-Edgren S., Adamson K., Fitzgerald C. A review of currently published evaluation instruments for human patient simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing 2010, 6:e25-e35. 10.1016/j.ecns.2009.08.004.
11. Lasater K. High-fidelity simulation and the development of clinical judgment: Students' experiences. Journal of Nursing Education 2007, 46:269-276.
12. Lie D., Encinas J., Stephens F., Prislin M. Do faculty show the 'halo effect' in rating students compared with standardized patients during a clinical examination?. Internet Journal of Family Practice 2010, 8(2).
13. McCauland L.L., Curran C.C., Cataldi P. Use of a human patient simulator for undergraduate nurse education. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship 2004, 1:1-17.
14. Mould J., White H., Gallagher R. Evaluation of a critical care simulation series for undergraduate nursing students. Contemporary Nurse 2011, 38:180-190.
15. Nehring W.M., Lashley F.R. High-fidelity patient simulation in nursing education 2010, Jones and Bartlett, Boston.
16. Prion, S. (2013). Evaluating simulations. Retrieved May 3, 2013, from http://sirc.nln.org/mod/resource/view.php?id=99.
17. Rhodes M., Curran C. Use of the human patient simulator to teach clinical judgment skills in a baccalaureate nursing program. Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2005, 23:256-262.
18. Smith S., Roehrs C. High-fidelity simulation: Factors correlated with nursing student satisfaction and self-confidence. Nursing Education Perspectives 2009, 30:74-78.
19. Stroud L., Herold J., Tomlinson G., Cavalcanti R. Who you know or what you know? Effect of examiner familiarity with residents on OSCE scores. Academic Medicine 2011, 86:S8-S11.
20. Waxman K.T. The development of evidence-based clinical simulation scenarios: Guidelines for nurse educators. Journal of Nursing Education 2010, 49:29-35.
21. Wilkinson T.J., Frampton C.M., Thompson-Fawcett M., Egan T. Objectivity in objective structured clinical examinations: Checklists are no substitute for examiner commitment. Academic Medicine 2003, 78:219-223.