Development and evaluation of the personal Patient Profile-Prostate (P3P), a Web-based decision support system for men newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2010, Pages

  Berry, Donna L ^a   Halpenny, Barbara ^a   Wolpin, Seth ^b   Davison, B Joyce ^c   Ellis, William J ^d   Lober, William B ^b   McReynolds, Justin ^b   Wulff, Jennifer ^e  

^a DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer assisted; Decision making; Pilot study; Prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COUNSELING; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION; PILOT STUDY; PROSTATE TUMOR;

AGED; COUNSELING; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PILOT PROJECTS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 78651310782     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1576     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Berry DL, Ellis WJ, Woods NF, Schwien C, Mullen KH, Yang C. Treatment decision-making by men with localized prostate cancer: the influence of personal factors. Urol Oncol 2003;21(2):93-100.
2. Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Van Manen L. A decision aid for men with early stage prostate cancer: theoretical basis and a test by surrogate patients. Health Expect 2001 Dec; 4(4):221-234.
3. Davison BJ, Gleave ME, Goldenberg SL, Degner LF, Hoffart D, Berkowitz J. Assessing information and decision preferences of men with prostate cancer and their partners. Cancer Nurs 2002 Feb; 25(1):42-49.
4. Patel HR, Mirsadraee S, Emberton M. The patient's dilemma: prostate cancer treatment choices. J Urol 2003 Mar; 169(3):828-833. [doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000052056.27609.8a] (Pubitemid 36188102)
5. Steginga SK, Occhipinti S, Gardiner RA, Yaxley J, Heathcote P. Making decisions about treatment for localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 2002 Feb; 89(3):255-260.
6. Diefenbach MA, Dorsey J, Uzzo RG, Hanks GE, Greenberg RE, Horwitz E, et al. Decision-making strategies for patients with localized prostate cancer. Semin Urol Oncol 2002 Feb; 20(1):55-62.
7. Berry DL, Ellis WJ, Russell KJ, Blasko JC, Bush N, Blumenstein B, et al. Factors that predict treatment choice and satisfaction with the decision in men with localized prostate cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2006 Dec; 5(3):219-226.
8. Nexcura. Prostate Cancer Profiler Tool. 2010. URL: https://www. cancerfacts.com/Secure/InterfaceSecure.asp?CB=14 [accessed 2010-06-06] [WebCite Cache ID 5qfynpUwW]
9. Moul JW, Esther TA, Bauer JJ. Implementation of a web-based prostate cancer decision site. Semin Urol Oncol 2000 Aug; 18(3):241-244.
10. Onel E, Hamond C, Wasson JH, Berlin BB, Ely MG, Laudone VP, et al. Assessment of the feasibility and impact of shared decision making in prostate cancer. Urology 1998 Jan; 51(1):63-66.
11. Diefenbach MA, Butz BP. A multimedia interactive education system for prostate cancer patients: development and preliminary evaluation. J Med Internet Res 2004 Jan 21; 6(1):e. [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.1.e3]
12. Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Van Manen L, Skarsgard D, Siemens R. Evaluation of a question-and-answer booklet on early-stage prostate-cancer. Patient Educ Couns 2003 Feb; 49(2):115-124.
13. O'Connor AM, Tugwell P, Wells GA, Elmslie T, Jolly E, Hollingworth G, et al. A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation. Patient Educ Couns 1998 Mar; 33(3):267-279. (Pubitemid 28168092)
14. Koyanl S, Bailey R, Nall J. Research-based Web Design & Usability Guidelines. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute: Office of Communications; 2003:1-128.
15. Dockrey MR, Lober WB, Wolpin SE, Rae LJ, Berry DL. Distributed health assessment and intervention research software framework. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2005:940.
16. Lee JM, Ware B. In: Ware B, editor. Open source Web development with LAMP: using Linux, Apache, MySQL, Perl, and PHP. Boston: Addison-Wesley; 2003.
17. Spielberger C. In: Spielberger C, editor. State-Trait Anxiety inventory for Adults (Form Y). Palo Alto: Mind Garden, Inc.; 1983.
18. O'Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making 1995;15(1):25-30.
19. Tariman JD, Berry DL, Halpenny B, Wolpin S, Schepp K. Validation and testing of the Acceptability E-scale for Web-based patient-reported outcomes in cancer care. Appl Nurs Res 2009 Sep. 17. [doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2009.04.003]
20. Davison BJ, Goldenberg SL, Gleave ME, Degner LF. Provision of individualized information to men and their partners to facilitate treatment decision making in prostate cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 2003;30(1):107-114. [doi: 10.1188/03. ONF.107-114]
21. Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P. The Control Preferences Scale. Can J Nurs Res 1997;29(3):21-43.
22. Wei JT, Dunn RL, Sandler HM, McLaughlin PW, Montie JE, Litwin MS, et al. Comprehensive comparison of health-related quality of life after contemporary therapies for localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2002 Jan 15; 20(2):557-566.
23. Davison BJ, Parker PA, Goldenberg SL. Patients' preferences for communicating a prostate cancer diagnosis and participating in medical decision-making. BJU Int 2004 Jan; 93(1):47-51.
24. Lipp ER. Web resources for patients with prostate cancer: a starting point. Semin Urol Oncol 2002 Feb; 20(1):32-38.
25. Drennan J. Cognitive interviewing: verbal data in the design and pretesting of questionnaires. J Adv Nurs 2003 Apr; 42(1):57-63.
26. Kushniruk AW, Patel VL. Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems. J Biomed Inform 2004 Feb; 37(1):56-76. [doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.01.003] (Pubitemid 38338551)
27. Neuendorf K. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2002:301.
28. Jaja C, Pares-Avila J, Wolpin S, Berry D. Usability evaluation of the interactive Personal Patient Profile-Prostate decision support system with African American men. J Natl Med Assoc 2010 Apr; 102(4):290-297.
29. Ryan P, Pumilia NJ, Henak B, Chang T. Development and performance usability testing of a theory-based, computerized, tailored intervention. Comput Inform Nurs 2009;27(5):288-98. quiz 299. [doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181b21779]
30. Moore M, Bias RG, Prentice K, Fletcher R, Vaughn T. Web usability testing with a Hispanic medically underserved population. J Med Libr Assoc 2009 Apr; 97(2):114-121. [doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.2.008]
31. Berry D. Electronic Self-Report Assessment for Cancer (ESRA-C): Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial. 2008 Presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting; June 8, 2008; Chicago.
32. Wolpin S, Berry D, Austin-Seymour M, Bush N, Fann JR, Halpenny B, et al. Acceptability of an Electronic Self-Report Assessment Program for patients with cancer. Comput Inform Nurs 2008;26(6):332-338. [doi: 10.1097/01. NCN.0000336464.79692.6a]
33. DiIorio C, Escoffery C, McCarty F, Yeager KA, Henry TR, Koganti A, et al. Evaluation of WebEase: an epilepsy self-management Web site. Health Educ Res 2009 Apr; 24(2):185-19. [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/her/cyn012]
34. Elwyn G, O'Connor AM, Bennett C, Newcombe RG, Politi M, Durand MA, et al. Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi). PLoS One 2009;4(3):e470. [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004705]
35. Berry DL. Using the Personal Patient Profile-Prostate (P4): evidence of the digital divide. 2008 Presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology Genitourinary Cancers Symposium; February 14-16, 2008; San Francisco.