Decisional role preferences, risk knowledge and information interests in patients with multiple sclerosis

Multiple Sclerosis

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 643-650

  Heesen, Christoph ^a   Kasper, Jürgen ^a,b   Segal, Julia ^c   Köpke, Sascha ^a,b   Mühlhauser, Ingrid ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^c North West London Hosp NHS Trust   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Information interests; Multiple sclerosis; Risk information; Role preferences; Shared decision making

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DISEASE COURSE; DISEASE DURATION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; IMMUNOTHERAPY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; OUTPATIENT CARE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; POSTAL MAIL; PROGNOSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DATA COLLECTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK;

EID: 9744248302     PISSN: 13524585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/1352458504ms1112oa     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. General Medical Council: Protecting patients, guiding doctors. Seeking patients' consent: the ethical considerations. London W1N 6JE, 1999 (http://www.gmc-uk.org). Last accessed 2 September 2004.
2. Coulter A, Entwistle V, Gilbert D. Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough? Br Med J 1999; 318: 318-22.
3. Tremlett HL, Luscombe DK, Wiles CM. Use of corticosteroids in multiple sclerosis by consultant neurologists in the united kingdom. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 1998; 65: 362-65.
4. Filippini G, Munari L, Incorvaia B, Ebers GC, Polman C, D'Amico R et al. Interferons in multiple sclerosis. a systematic review. Lancet 2003; 61: 45-52.
5. Köpke S, Heesen C, Kasper J, Mühlhauser I. Steroid treatment for relapses in multiple sclerosis - the evidence urges shared decison making. Acta Neurol Scand 2004; 110: 1-5.
6. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med 1999; 49: 651-61.
7. National Institute for Clinical Excellence: Multiple sclerosis. Management of multiple sclerosis in primary and secondary care. Clinical Guideline 8, November 8, 2003, available at the NICE Website: http://vvww.nice.org.uk
8. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Mulley AI. Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures. Br Med J 2002; 324: 827-30.
9. O'Connor A, Rostom A, Fiset V, Tetroe J, Entwistle V, Llewellyn-Thomas H et al. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. Br Med J 1999; 319: 731-34.
10. Rothwell PM, McDowell D, Wong CK, Dorman PJ. Doctors and patients do not agree: cross sectional study of patients' and doctors' perceptions and assessments of disability in multiple sclerosis. Br Med J 1997; 314: 1580- 83.
11. Freeman JA, Thompson AJ. Community services in multiple sclerosis: still a matter of chance. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2000; 69: 728-32.
12. Wollin J, Dale H, Spenser N, Walsh A. What people with newly diagnosed MS (and their families and friends) need to know. Int J MS Care 2000; 2: 4-14.
13. Vickrey BG, Shatin D, Wolf SM, Shapiro MF, Delrahim S, Belin TR et al. Management of multiple sclerosis across managed care and fee-for-service systems. Neurology 2000; 55: 1341-49.
14. Heesen C, Kolbeck J, Gold SM, Schulz H, Schulz KH. Delivering the diagnosis of MS - results of a survey among patients and neurologists. Acta Neurol Scand 2003; 107: 363-68.
15. Mushlin DH, Moooney C, Grow V, Phelps CE affiliated with the Rochester- Toronto MRI Study Group. The value of diagnostic information to patients with suspected multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 1994; 51: 67-72.
16. O'Connor P, Detsky ASA, Tansey C, Kucharczyk W and the Rochester-Toronto MRI-Study group. Effect of diagnostic testing for multiple sclerosis on patient health perceptions. Arch Neurol 1994; 51: 46-51.
17. Mohr DC, Goodkin DE, Likosky W, Gatto N, Neilley LK, Griffin C et al. Therapeutic expectations of patients with multiple sclerosis upon initiating interferon-beta 1-b: relationship to adherence to treatment. Mult Scler 1996; 5: 222-26.
18. PRIMS (Prevention of relapses and disability by interferon beta-1a for relapsing multiple sclerosis) study group: PRIMS-4. Long-term efficacy of interferon-beta-1a in relapsing MS. Neurology 2001; 56: 1628-36.
19. Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P. The control preference scale. Can J Nurs Res 1997; 29: 21-43.
20. Zysno PV. Ordinale Entfaltung. In Zysno PV ed. Qualitative Verbundmessung. Lengerich, Berlin, Düsseldorf, Leipzig, Riga, Scottsdale, Wien, Zagreb: Papst Sciences Publishers, 1999: 83-111.
21. Blanchard CG, Labrecque MS, Ruckdeschel JC, Blanchard EB. Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalized cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 1980; 7: 1139.
22. Deber RB, Kraetschmer N, Irvine J. What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? Arch Int Med 1996; 156: 1414.
23. Entwistle VA, Skea ZC, O'Donnell MT. Decisions about treatment: interpretations of two measures of control by women having a hysterectomy. Soc Sci Med 2001; 53: 721-32.
24. Morris J, Royle GT. Offering patients a choice of surgery for early breast cancer: a reduction in anxiety and depression in patients and their husbands. Soc Sci Med 1988; 26: 583.
25. Fallowfield, Hall A, Maguire GP, Baum M. Psychosocial outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early stage breast cancer outside a clinical trial. Br Med J 1990; 301: 575.
26. Degner LF, Kristjanson L, Bowman D, Sloan JA, Carriere KC, O'Neil J et al. Decisional preferences and information needs in women with breast cancer. J Am Med Assoc 1997; 277: 1485
27. O'Connor AM, Légaré F, Stacey D. Risk communication in practice: the contribution of decision aids. Br Med J 2003; 327 736-40.
28. Prosser LA, Kuntz KM, Bar-Or A, Weinstein MC. The relationship between risk attitude and treatment choice in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Med Decis Making 2002; 22: 506-13.
29. Bekker H, Lilleyman J, Thornton JG, Connelly JB, Hewison J, Robinson MB et al. Informed decision making: an annotated bibliography and systematic review. Health Technol Assess 1999; 3: 1-158.
30. O'Connor AM, Drake ER, Wells GA, Tugwell P, Laupacis A, Elmslie. A survey of the decision making needs of Canadians faced with complex health decisions. Health Expect 2003; 6: 97-109.
31. Sommerset M, Campbell R, Sharp DJ, Peters TJ. What do people with MS want and expect from health-care services? Health Expect 2001; 4: 29-37.
32. Baker LM. A new method for studying patient information needs and information seeking patterns. Top Health Inform Manage 1995; 16: 19-28.