Assessing web services of emerging economies in an Eastern country - Taiwan's e-government

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 267-276

  Hsieh, P H ^a   Huang, C S ^b   Yen, David C ^c  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

DEA; E Government; Internet; Non profit organization; Web content analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879092598     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Banker R., Charnes A., Cooper W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 1984, 1078-1092.
2. Cardo T., Williams J.G. Models and metrics for evaluating local electronic government systems and services. Electronic Journal of e-Government 2004, 2(2):95-104.
3. Chadwick A. Bringing e-democracy back in: Why it matters for future research on e-governance. Social Science Computer Review 2003, 21(4):443-455.
4. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 1978, 2(6):429-444.
5. Farkas D.K., Farkas J.B. Principle of web design 2002, Longman, New York.
6. Farrell M. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) 1957, 120(3):253-290.
7. Gil-Garcia J., Pardo T. e-Government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly 2005, 22(2):187-216.
8. Gore A. From red tape to results: Creating a government that works better and costs less: Report of the national performance review 1993, USGPO, Washington, D.C.
9. Heeks R., Bailur S. Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly 2007, 24(2):243-265.
10. Korac-Kakabadse A., Korac-Kakabadse N. Information technology's impact on the quality of democracy: Reinventing the 'democratic vessel'. Reinventing government in the information age: International practice in IT-enabled public sector reform 1999, 211-228. Routledge, London. R. Heeks (Ed.).
11. Miranda F.J., Sanguino R., Banegil T.M. Quantitative assessment of European municipal web sites development and use of an evaluation tool. Internet Research 2009, 19(4):425-441.
12. Moon M.J. Can IT help government to restore public trust? Declining public trust and potential prospects of IT in the public sector. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICCS 2003) 2003, January.
13. Nielsen Norman Group Site map usability: 28 design guidelines based on usability studies with people using site maps 2002, (Retrieved from http://www.nngroup.com/).
14. OECD The e-government imperative. France: OECD e-government studies 2003.
15. Reschenthaler G., Thompson F. The information revolution and the new public management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 1996, 6(1):125.
16. Rorissa A., Demissie D. An analysis of African e-government service websites. Government Information Quarterly 2010, 27(2):161-169.
17. Scholl H.J. E-government-induced business process change (BPC): An empirical study of current practices. International Journal of Electronic Government Research 2005, 1(2):27-49.
18. Shan S., Wang L., Wang J., Hao Y., Hua F. Research on e-government evaluation model based on the principal component analysis. Information Technology and Management 2011, 12(2):173-185.
19. Tolbert C., Mossberger K. The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review 2006, 66(3):354-369.
20. West D. e-Government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review 2004, 64(1):15-27.
21. West D. Global e-government survey-2007 2007, (Retrieved from http://www.indg.in/e-governance/Global%20e-Gov-2007.pdf).