A systematic review-meta-analysis and meta-regression on the effect of selected competitive exclusion products on Salmonella spp. prevalence and concentration in broiler chickens

Preventive Veterinary Medicine

Volumn 111, Issue 1-2, 2013, Pages 112-125

  Kerr, Ashley K ^a,c   Farrar, Ashley M ^a,c   Waddell, Lisa A ^a,c   Wilkins, Wendy ^b   Wilhelm, Barbara J ^c   Bucher, Oliver ^c   Wills, Robert W ^d   Bailey, R Hart ^d   Varga, Csaba ^c   McEwen, Scott A ^a,c   Rajić, Andrijana ^a,c  

^a PUBLIC HEALTH AGENCY OF CANADA   (Canada)

^b Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^d MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Broiler chicken; Competitive exclusion; Meta analysis; Salmonella; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

PROBIOTIC AGENT;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL SALMONELLOSIS; ARTICLE; BIRD DISEASE; CHICKEN; DRUG EFFECT; META ANALYSIS; MICROBIOLOGY; PREVALENCE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SALMONELLA;

ANIMALS; CHICKENS; POULTRY DISEASES; PREVALENCE; PROBIOTICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SALMONELLA; SALMONELLA INFECTIONS, ANIMAL;

GALLUS GALLUS; SALMONELLA;

EID: 84879022062     PISSN: 01675877     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Barnes E.M., Mead G.C., Barnum D.A., Harry E.G. The intestinal flora of the chicken in the period 2 to 6 weeks of age, with particular reference to the anaerobic bacteria. Br. Poult. Sci. 1972, 13:311-326.
2. Begg C.B., Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994, 50:1088-1101.
3. Blankenship L.C., Bailey J.S., Cox N.A., Craven S.E., Meinersmann R.J., Stern N.J. Colonization Control of Human Bacterial Enteropathogens in Poultry 1991, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, California.
4. Bolder N.M. Microbial challenges of poultry meat production. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 2007, 63:401-411.
5. Borenstein M., Hedges L.V., Higgins J.P.T., Rothstein H.R. Introduction to Meta-Analysis 2009, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., West Sussex, UK. 1st ed.
6. Burnham V.E. Improving food safety at the broiler farm - a HACCP approach. JCVA 2007, 23:7-11.
7. Carter A.J., Adams M.R., Woodward M.J., La Ragione R.M. Control strategies for salmonella colonization of poultry: the probiotic perspective. Food Sci. Technol. Bull: Funct. Foods 2009, 5:103-115.
8. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 2009. Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. (accessed June, 2009). http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/SysRev/!SSL!/WebHelp/SysRev3.htm.
9. CFIA, 2009. Guide to food labelling and advertising: Chapter 8 - Health Claims. (accessed August, 2012). http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/fssa/labeti/guide/tab8e.shtml.
10. Chambers J.R., Gong J. The intestinal microbiota and its modulation for Salmonella control in chickens. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44:3149-3159.
11. Corrier D.E., Byrd J.A., Hume M.E., Nisbet D.J., Stanker L.H. Effect of simultaneous or delayed competitive exclusion treatment on spread of salmonella in chicks. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 1998, 7:132-137.
12. Cox J.M., Chung B.L. Competitive exclusion: Probiotic preparations for poultry. Proc. Aust. Poult. Sci. Sym. 2000, 12:32-39.
13. Crombie, I.K., Davies, H.T.O., 2009. What is meta-analysis? Vol. 2. (accessed June, 2009). http://www.whatisseries.co.uk/.
14. D'Aimmo M.R., Modesto M., Biavati B. Antibiotic resistance of lactic acid bacteria and Bifidobacterium spp. isolated from dairy and pharmaceutical products. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 115:35-42.
15. DerSimonian R., Kacker R. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. Contemp. Clin. Trials 2007, 28:105-114.
16. Egger M., Davey Smith G., Schneider M., Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997, 315:629-634.
17. FAO/WHO, 2002. Probiotics in food. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 85. Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. Report of a joint FAO/WHO working group on drafting guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food, London, Ontario, Canada. April 30-May 1, 2002, p.46.
18. Farrar, A.M., 2009. The application of research synthesis methods for evaluating primary research on Salmonella in broiler chickens. MSc. Thesis, University of Guelph, Canada.
19. Fowler N.G. Antimicrobials and competitive exclusion. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1992, 15:277-279.
20. Friedrich J.O., Adhikari N.K., Beyene J. Inclusion of zero total event trials in meta-analyses maintains analytic consistency and incorporates all available data. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2007, 7:5.
21. Fuller R. Probiotics in man and animals. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1989, 66:365-378.
22. Higgins J.P., Thompson S.G., Deeks J.J., Altman D.G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003, 327:557-560.
23. Hume M.E., Corrier D.E., Nisbet D.J., DeLoach J.R. Early salmonella challenge time and reduction in chick cecal colonization following treatment with a characterized competitive exclusion culture. J. Food Prot. 1998, 61:673-676.
24. Hume M.E., Corrier D.E., Nisbet D.J., DeLoach J.R. Reduction of Salmonella crop and cecal colonization by a characterized competitive exclusion culture in broilers during grow-out. J. Food Prot. 1996, 59:688-693.
25. Ioannidis J.P., Trikalinos T.A. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey. CMAJ 2007, 176:1091-1096.
26. Jeffrey, J.S., 1999. Use of competitive exclusion products for poultry. (accessed August, 2009). http://animalscience.ucdavis.edu/avian/pfs30.htm.
27. Juni P., Holenstein F., Sterne J., Bartlett C., Egger M. Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2002, 31:115-123.
28. Kabir S.M.L. The role of probiotics in the poultry industry. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10:3531-3546.
29. Kubena L.F., Byrd J.A., Young C.R., Corrier D.E. Effects of tannic acid on cecal volatile fatty acids and susceptibility to salmonella typhimurium colonization in broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 2001, 80:1293-1298.
30. Maijala R., Ranta J., Seuna E., Peltola J. The efficiency of the Finnish Salmonella control programme. Food Control 2005, 16:669-675.
31. Mead G.C. The use of probiotics to control pathogens in poultry. Food Safety Control in the Poultry Industry 2005, 216-236. Woodhead Publishing Limited and CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, Florida. G.C. Mead (Ed.).
32. Mead G.C. Prospects for 'competitive exclusion' treatment to control salmonellas and other foodborne pathogens in poultry. Vet. J. 2000, 159:111-123.
33. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G., Group PRISMA. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 6:1000097.
34. Mountzouris K.C., Balaskas C., Xanthakos I., Tzivinikou A., Fegeros K. Effects of a multi-species probiotic on biomarkers of competitive exclusion efficacy in broilers challenged with Salmonella Enteritidis. Br. Poult. Sci. 2009, 50:467-478.
35. Nash W.A. Salmonella control in poultry and pigs. Pig J. 2004, 54:146-156.
36. Nava G.M., Bielke L.R., Callaway T.R., Castaneda M.P. Probiotic alternatives to reduce gastrointestinal infections: the poultry experience. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2005, 6:105-118.
37. Nurmi E., Rantala M. New aspects of salmonella infection in broiler production. Nature 1973, 241:210-211.
38. O'Connor A.M., Sargeant J.M., Gardner I.A., Dickson J.S., Torrence M.E., Dewey C.E., Dohoo I.R., Evans R.B., Gray J.T., Greiner M., Keefe G., Lefebvre S.L., Morley P.S., Ramirez A., Sischo W., Smith D.R., Snedeker K., Sofos J., Ward M.P., Wills R. The REFLECT statement: methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety. Prev. Vet. Med. 2010, 93:11-18.
39. Ouwehand A.C., Kirjavainen P.V., Shor C., Salminen S. Probiotics: mechanisms and established effects. Int. Dairy J. 1999, 9:43-52.
40. Pascual M., Hugas M., Badiola J.I., Monfort J.M., Garriga M. Lactobacillus salivarius CTC2197 prevents Salmonella Enteritidis colonization in chickens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65:4981-4986.
41. Patterson J.A., Burkholder K.M. Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poult. Sci. 2003, 82:627-631.
42. Revolledo L., Ferreira C.S., Ferreira A.J. Prevention of Salmonella Typhimurium colonization and organ invasion by combination treatment in broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 2009, 88:734-743.
43. Revolledo L., Ferreira A.J.P., Mead G.C. Prospects in Salmonella control: competitive exclusion, probiotics, and enhancement of avian intestinal immunity. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2006, 15:341-351.
44. Sanders M.E., Tompkins T., Heimbach J.T., Kolida S. Weight of evidence needed to substantiate a health effect for probiotics and prebiotics: regulatory considerations in Canada, E.U., and U.S. Eur. J. Nutr. 2005, 44:303-310.
45. Sargeant J.M., Rajic A., Read S., Ohlsson A. The process of systematic review and its application in agri-food public-health. Prev. Vet. Med. 2006, 75:141-151.
46. Schneitz C. Competitive exclusion in poultry - 30 years of research. Food Control 2005, 16:657-667.
47. Schneitz C., Mead G.C. Competitive exclusion. Salmonella in Domestic Animals 2000, 301-322. CAB International, New York, USA. C. Wray, A. Wray (Eds.).
48. Stavric S., D'Aoust J. Undefined and defined bacterial preparations for the competitive exclusion of Salmonella in poultry - a review. J. Food Prot. 1993, 56:173-180.
49. Stavric S. Defined cultures and prospects. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1992, 15:245-263.
50. Steer T., Carpenter H., Tuohy K., Gibson G.R. Perspectives on the role of the human gut microbiota and its modulation by pro- and prebiotics. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2000, 13:229-254.
51. Sternberg Lewerin S., Boqvist S., Engstrom B., Haggblom P. The effective control of Salmonella in Swedish poultry. Food Safety Control in the Poultry Industry 2005, 195-215. Woodhead Publishing Limited and CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, Florida. G.C. Mead (Ed.).
52. Sutton A.J., Abrams K.R., Jones D.R., Sheldon T.A., Song F. Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research 2000, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, England.
53. van Houwelingen H.C., Arends L.R., Stijnen T. Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression. Stat. Med. 2002, 21:589-624.
54. Wagner R.D., Cerniglia C.E. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of competitive exclusion bacteria applied to newly hatched chickens. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005, 102:349-353.