Beyond perceptual load and dilution: A review of the role of working memory in selective attention

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 4, Issue MAY, 2013, Pages

  De Fockert, Jan W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Distractibility; Meta analysis; Review; Selective attention; Working memory capacity; Working memory load

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878953149     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00287     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Ahmed, L., and De Fockert, J. W. (2012a). Working memory load can both improve and impair selective attention: evidence from the Navon paradigm. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 74, 1397-1405.
2. Ahmed, L., and De Fockert, J. W. (2012b). Focusing on attention: the effects of working memory capacity and load on selective attention. PLoS ONE 7:e43101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043101
3. Awh, E., and Jonides, J. (2001). Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5, 119-126.
4. Awh, E., Vogel, E. K., and Oh, S.-H. (2006). Interactions between attention and working memory. Neuroscience 139, 201-208.
5. Baddeley, A. (1996). Exploring the central executive. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 49A, 5-28.
6. Benoni, H., and Tsal, Y. (2010). Where have we gone wrong? Perceptual load does not affect selective attention. Vision Res. 50, 1292-1298.
7. Benoni, H., and Tsal, Y. (2012). Controlling for dilution while manipulating load: perceptual and sensory limitations are just two aspects of task difficulty. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 19, 631-638.
8. Berti, S., and Schróger, E. (2003). Working memory controls involuntary attention switching: evidence from an auditory distraction paradigm. Eur. J. Neurosci. 17, 1119-1122.
9. Boot, W. R., Brockmole, J. R., and Simons, D. J. (2005). Attention capture is modulated in dual-task situations. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12, 662-668.
10. Caparos, S., Ahmed, L., Bremner, A. J., De Fockert, J. W., Linnell, K. J., and Davidoff, J. (2012). Exposure to an urban environment alters the local bias of a remote culture. Cognition 122, 80-85.
11. Caparos, S., and Linnell, K. J. (2010). The spatial focus of attention is controlled at perceptual and cognitive levels. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 36, 1080-1107.
12. Caparos, S., Linnell, K. J., Bremner, A. J., De Fockert, J. W., and Davidoff, J. (2013). Do local and global perceptual biases tell us anything about local and global selective attention? Psychol. Sci. 24, 206-212.
13. Carmel, D., Fairnie, J., and Lavie, N. (2012). Weight and see: loading working memory improves incidental identification of irrelevant faces. Front. Psychology 3:286. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00286
14. Chen, Z., and Chan, C. C. (2007). Distractor interference stays constant despite variation in working memory load. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 14, 306-312.
15. Chun, M. M. (2011). Visual working memory as visual attention sustained over time. Neuropsychologia 49, 1407-1409.
16. Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., and Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: the importance of working memory capacity. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 8, 331-335.
17. Dalton, P., Santangelo, V., and Spence, C. (2009a). The role of working memory in auditory selective attention. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 62, 2126-2132.
18. Dalton, P., Lavie, N., and Spence, C. (2009b). The role of working memory in tactile selective attention. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 62, 635-644.
19. De Fockert, J., Ramchurn, A., Van Velzen, J., Bergstróm, Z., and Bunce, D. (2009). Behavioural and ERP evidence of increased interference in old age. Brain Res. 1282, 67-73.
20. De Fockert, J. W. (2005). Keeping priorities: the role of working memory and selective attention in cognitive aging. Sci. Aging Knowledge Environ. 44, pe34.
21. De Fockert, J. W., and Bremner, A. J. (2011). Release of inattentional blindness by high working memory load: elucidating the relationship between working memory and selective attention. Cognition 121, 400-408.
22. De Fockert, J. W., Caparos, S., Linnell, K. J., and Davidoff, J. (2011). Reduced distractibility in a remote culture. PLoS ONE 6:e26337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026337
23. De Fockert, J. W., Mizon, G. A., and D'Ubaldo, M. A. (2010). No negative priming without cognitive control. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 36, 1333-1341.
24. De Fockert, J. W., Rees, G., Frith, C., and Lavie, N. (2004). Neural correlates of attentional capture in visual search. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 751-759.
25. De Fockert, J. W., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., and Lavie, N. (2001). The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science 291, 1803-1806.
26. De Fockert, J. W., and Theeuwes, J. (2012). Role of frontal cortex in attentional capture by singleton distractors. Brain Cogn. 80, 367-373.
27. De Fockert, J. W., and Wu, S. (2009). High working memory load leads to more Ebbinghaus illusion. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 21, 961-970.
28. de Liaño, B., Umiltà, C., Stablum, F., Tebaldi, F., and Cantagallo, A. (2010). Attentional distractor interference may be diminished by concurrent working memory load in normal participants and traumatic brain injury patients. Brain Cogn. 74, 298-305.
29. Desimone, R., and Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 193-222.
30. Engle, R. W., and Kane, M. J. (2004). "Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control," in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 44, ed B. Ross (New York, NY: Acodemic Press), 145-199.
31. Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., and Tuholski, S. W. (1999). "Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence and functions of the prefrontal cortex," in Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control, eds A. Miyake and P. Shah (London: Cambridge Press), 102-134.
32. Eriksen, B. A., and Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon identification of a target letter in a non- search task. Percept. Psychophys. 16, 143-149.
33. Gazzaley, A., and Nobre, A. C. (2012). Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 16, 129-135.
34. Gazzaley, A., Rissman, J., Cooney, J., Rutman, A., Seibert, T., Clapp, W., et al. (2007). Functional interactions between prefrontal and visual association cortex contribute to top-down modulation of visual processing. Cereb. Cortex 17, 125-135.
35. Hasher, L., and Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. 22, 122-149.
36. Heitz, R. P., and Engle, R. W. (2007). Focusing the spotlight: individual differences in visual attention control. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 136, 217-240.
37. Jongen, E. M. M., and Jonkman, L. M. (2011). Effects of concurrent working memory load on distractor processing and interference control in a name-face Stroop task. Psychophysiology 48, 31-43.
38. Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R., and Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 130, 169-183.
39. Kane, M. J., and Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 132, 47-70.
40. Kelley, T. A., and Lavie, N. (2011). Working memory load modulates distractor competition in primary visual cortex. Cereb. Cortex 21, 659-665.
41. Kim, S.-Y., Kim, M.-S., and Chun, M. M. (2005). Concurrent working memory load can reduce distraction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 16524-16529.
42. Lachter, J., Forster, K. I., and Ruthruff, E. (2004). Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): still no identification without attention. Psychol. Rev. 111, 880-913.
43. Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21, 451-468.
44. Lavie, N. (2010). Attention, distraction and cognitive control under load. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 19, 143-148.
45. Lavie, N., and Cox, S. (1997). On the efficiency of attentional selection: efficient visual search results in inefficient rejection of distraction. Psychol. Sci. 8, 395-398.
46. Lavie, N., and De Fockert, J. W. (2005). The role of working memory in attentional capture. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12, 669-674.
47. Lavie, N., and De Fockert, J. W. (2006). Frontal control of attentional Capture in visual search. Vis. Cogn. 14, 863-876.
48. Lavie, N., Hirst, A., De Fockert, J. W., and Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 133, 339-354.
49. Lavie, N., and Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Percept. Psychophys. 56, 183-197.
50. Legrain, V., Crombez, G., Verhoeven, K., and Mouraux, A. (2011). The role of working memory in the attentional control of pain. Pain 152, 453-459.
51. Macdonald, J. S. P., and Lavie, N. (2008). Load induced blindness. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 34, 1078-1091.
52. Mack, A., and Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional Blindness. London: MIT Press.
53. Mayer, J. S., Bittner, R. A., Nikolić, D., Bledowski, C., Goebel, R., and Linden, D. E. (2007). Common neural substrates for visual working memory and attention. Neuroimage 36, 441-453.
54. Morris, R. G., Gick, M. L., and Craik, F. I. M. (1988). Processing resources and age differences in working memory. Mem. Cogn. 16, 362-366.
55. Müller, N. G., Mollenhauer, M., Rósler, A., and Kleinschmidt, A. (2005). The attentional field has a Mexican hat distribution. Vis. Res. 45, 1129-1137.
56. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353-383.
57. Navon, D., and Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human processing system. Psychol. Rev. 86, 214-253.
58. Oberauer, K. (2003). Selective attention to elements in working memory. Exp. Psychol. 50, 257-269.
59. Olivers, C. N., Peters, J., Houtkamp, R., and Roelfsema, P. R. (2011). Different states in visual working memory: when it guides attention and when it does not. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15, 327-334.
60. Park, S., Kim, M. S., and Chun, M. M. (2007). Concurrent working memory load can facilitate selective attention: evidence for specialized load. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 33, 1062-1075.
61. Pecchinenda, A., and Heil, M. (2007). Role of working memory load on selective attention to affectively valent information. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 19, 898-909.
62. Poole, B. J., and Kane, M. J. (2009). Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: the influences of sustained and selective attention. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 62, 1430-1454.
63. Pratt, N., Willoughby, A., and Swick, D. (2011). Effects of working memory load on visual selective attention: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5:57. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00057
64. Rabbitt, P. (1965). An age-decrement in the ability to ignore irrelevant information. J. Gerontol. 20, 233-238.
65. Roberts, B., Harris, M. G., and Yates, T. A. (2005). The roles of inducer size and distance in the Ebbinghaus illusion (Titchener circles). Perception 34, 847-856.
66. Rock, I., Linnett, C. M., Grant, P., and Mack, A. (1992). Perception without attention: results of a new method. Cogn. Psychol. 24, 502-534.
67. SanMiguel, I., Corral, M. J., and Escera, C. (2008). When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 20, 1131-1145.
68. Scalf, P. E., Dux, P. E., and Marois, R. (2011). Working memory encoding delays top-down attention to visual cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 2593-2604.
69. Soto, D., Hodsoll, J., Rotshtein, P., and Humphreys, G. W. (2008). Automatic guidance of attention from working memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 342-348.
70. Stins, J. F., Vosse, S., Boomsma, D. I., and de Geus, E. J. (2004). On the role of working memory in response interference. Percept. Mot. Skills 99, 947-958.
71. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J. Exp. Psychol. 18, 643-662.
72. Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Percept. Psychophys. 51, 599-606.
73. Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychol. 123, 77-99.
74. Tipper, S. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 37, 571-590.
75. Tsal, Y., and Benoni, H. (2010). Diluting the burden of load: perceptual load effects are simply dilution effects. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 36, 1645-1656.
76. Tsuchida, Y., Katayama, J., and Murohashi, H. (2012). Working memory capacity affects the interference control of distractors at auditory gating. Neurosci. Lett. 516, 62-66.
77. Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., and Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behav. Res. Methods 37, 498-505.
78. Unsworth, N., McMillan, B. D., Brewer, G. A., and Spillers, G. J. (2012). Everyday attention failures: an individual differences investigation. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 38, 1765-1772.
79. Welford, A. T. (1958). Ageing and Human Skill. London: Oxford University Press.
80. Wilson, D. E., Muroi, M., and MacLeod, C. M. (2011). Dilution, not load, affects distractor processing. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 37, 319-335.
81. Yi, D. J., Woodman, G. F., Widders, D., Marois, R., and Chun, M. M. (2004). The neural fate of ignored stimuli: dissociable effects of perceptual and working memory load. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 992-996.
82. Young, A. W., Ellis, A. W., Flude, B. M., McWeeny, K. H., and Hay, D. C. (1986). Face-name interference. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 12, 466-475.