The spatial focus of attention is controlled at perceptual and cognitive levels

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1080-1107

  Caparos, Serge ^a   Linnell, Karina J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cognitive load; Perceptual load; Selective attention; Spatial attention

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; REACTION TIME; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; COGNITION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957369091     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0020367     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Anderson G.J., Kramer A.F. Limits of focused attention in three-dimensional space. Perception & Psychophysics 1993, 53:658-667.
2. Bahcall D.O., Kowler E. Attentional interference at small spatial separations. Vision Research 1999, 39:71-86.
3. Björk E.L., Murray J.T. On the nature of input channels in visual processing. Psychological Review 1977, 84:472-484.
4. Boudreau C.E., Williford T.H., Maunsell J.H. Effects of task difficulty and target likelihood in area V4 of macaque monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology 2006, 96:2377-2387.
5. Caparos S., Linnell K.J. The interacting effect of load and space on visual selective attention. Visual Cognition 2009, 17:1218-1227.
6. Cave K.R., Bichot N.P. Visuospatial attention: Beyond a spotlight model. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1999, 6:204-223.
7. Cave K.R., Zimmerman J.M. Flexibility in spatial attention before and after practice. Psychological Science 1997, 8:399-403.
8. Chong S.C., Treisman A. Representation of statistical properties. Vision Research 2003, 43:393-404.
9. Cohen A., Shoup R. Perceptual dimensional constraints in response selection processes. Cognitive Psychology 1997, 32:128-181.
10. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002, 3:201-215.
11. Cutzu F., Tsotsos J.K. The selective tuning model of attention: Psychophysical evidence for a suppressive annulus around an attended item. Vision Research 2003, 43:205-219.
12. de Fockert J.W., Rees G., Frith C.D., Lavie N. The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science 2001, 291:1803-1806.
13. Downing C.J. Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: Effects on perceptual quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1988, 14:188-202.
14. Eimer M. Attentional selection and attentional gradients: An alternative method for studying transient visual-spatial attention. Psychophysiology 1997, 34:365-376.
15. Engle R.W. Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2002, 11:19-23.
16. Engle R.W., Cantor J., Carullo J.J. Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1992, 18:972-992.
17. Eriksen B.A., Eriksen C.W. Effects of noise letters upon identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics 1974, 16:143-149.
18. Eriksen C.W., Hoffman J.E. Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics 1972, 12:201-204.
19. Eriksen C.W., Hoffman J.E. Extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual-displays. Perception & Psychophysics 1973, 14:155-160.
20. Eriksen C.W., James St.J.D. Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention - a zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics 1986, 40:225-240.
21. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., Johnston J.C. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18:1030-1044.
22. Forster S., Lavie N. High perceptual load makes everybody equal: Eliminating individual differences in distractibility with load. Psychological Science 2007, 18:377-381.
23. Forster S., Lavie N. Attentional capture by entirely irrelevant distractors. Visual Cognition 2008, 16:200-214.
24. Handy T.C., Kingstone A., Mangun G.R. Spatial distribution of visual attention: Perceptual sensitivity and response latency. Perception & Psychophysics 1996, 58:613-627.
25. Handy T.C., Mangun G.R. Attention and spatial selection: Electrophysiological evidence for modulation by perceptual load. Perception & Psychophysics 2000, 62:175-186.
26. Hazeltine E., Poldrack R., Gabrieli J.D. Neural activation during response competition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12:118-129.
27. Hodgson T.L., Müller H.J., O'Leary M.J. Attentional localization prior to simple and directed manual responses. Perception & Psychophysics 1999, 61:308-321.
28. Hopf J.M., Boehler C.N., Luck S.J., Tsotsos J.K., Heinze H.J., Schoenfeld M.A. Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103:1053-1058.
29. Jonides J. Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. Attention and Performance IX 1981, 187-203. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. J.B. Long, A.D. Baddeley (Eds.).
30. Kahneman D., Chajczyk D. Tests of the automaticity of reading: Dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1983, 9:497-509.
31. Kane M.J., Engle R.W. The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2002, 9:637-671.
32. Kramer A.F., Humphrey D.G., Larish J.F., Logan G.D., Strayer D.L. Aging and inhibition: Beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention. Psychology and Aging 1994, 9:491-512.
33. Kramer A.F., Jacobson A. Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics 1991, 50:267-284.
34. Kristjansson A., Nakayama K. The attentional blink in space and time. Vision Research 2002, 42:2039-2050.
35. LaBerge D. Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1983, 9:371-379.
36. LaBerge D., Brown V., Carter M., Bash D., Hartley A. Reducing the effects of adjacent distractors by narrowing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1991, 17:65-76.
37. Lavie N. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21:451-468.
38. Lavie N. Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9:75-82.
39. Lavie N., De Fockert J. The role of working memory in attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2005, 12:669-674.
40. Lavie N., De Fockert J. Frontal control of attentional capture in visual search. Visual Cognition 2006, 14:863-876.
41. Lavie N., de Fockert J.W. Contrasting effects of sensory limits and capacity limits in visual selective attention. Perception & Psychophysics 2003, 65:202-212.
42. Lavie N., Fox E. The role of perceptual load in negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:1038-1052.
43. Lavie N., Hirst A., de Fockert J.W., Viding E. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004, 133:339-354.
44. Lavie N., Tsal Y. Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics 1994, 56:183-197.
45. Linnell, K. J., Fonteneau, E., Wakui, E., & Davidoff, J. (submitted). New cultural perspectives on old geometric illusions.
46. Macdonald J.S., Lavie N. Load induced blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:1078-1091.
47. Madden D.J., Langley L.K. Age-related changes in selective attention and perceptual load during visual search. Psychology and Aging 2003, 18:54-67.
48. Maylor E.A., Lavie N. The influence of perceptual load on age differences in selective attention. Psychology and Aging 1998, 13:563-573.
49. McCarley J.S., Mounts J.R. On the relationship between flanker interference and localized attentional interference. Acta Psychologica 2008, 128:102-109.
50. McCarley J.S., Mounts J.R., Kramer A.F. Age-related differences in localized attentional interference. Psychology and Aging 2004, 19:203-210.
51. McCarley J.S., Mounts J.R., Kramer A.F. Spatially mediated capacity limits in attentive visual perception. Acta Psychologica 2007, 126:98-119.
52. Miller J. The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: A search for boundary conditions. Perception & Psychophysics 1991, 49:270-288.
53. Mounts J.R. Evidence for suppressive mechanisms in attentional selection: Feature singletons produce inhibitory surrounds. Perception & Psychophysics 2000, 62:969-983.
54. Mounts J.R. Attentional selection: A salience-based competition for representation. Perception and Psychophysics 2005, 67:1190-1198.
55. Mounts J.R., Gavett B.E. The role of salience in localized attentional interference. Vision Research 2004, 44:1575-1588.
56. Mounts J.R., Tomaselli R.G. Competition for representation is mediated by relative attentional salience. Acta Psychologica 2005, 118:261-275.
57. Müller N.G., Mollenhauer M., Rosler A., Kleinschmidt A. The attentional field has a Mexican hat distribution. Vision Research 2005, 45:1129-1137.
58. Pan K., Eriksen C.W. Attentional distribution in the visual field during same-different judgments as assessed by response competition. Perception & Psychophysics 1993, 53:134-144.
59. Paquet L. Eliminating flanker effects and negative priming in the flankers task: Evidence for early selection. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2001, 8:301-306.
60. Pashler H. Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: Distinct attentional mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1991, 17:1023-1040.
61. Posner M.I. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1980, 32:3-25.
62. Rouder J.N., King J.W. Flanker and negative flanker effects in letter identification. Perception & Psychophysics 2003, 65:287-297.
63. Santangelo V., Finoia P., Raffone A., Belardinelli M.O., Spence C. Perceptual load affects exogenous spatial orienting while working memory load does not. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 184:371-382.
64. Scerif G., Worden M.S., Davidson M., Seiger L., Casey B.J. Context modulates early stimulus processing when resolving stimulus-response conflict. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18:781-792.
65. Schwartz S., Vuilleumier P., Hutton C., Maravita A., Dolan R.J., Driver J. Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: Modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15:770-786.
66. Shepherd M., Müller H.J. Movement versus focusing of visual-attention. Perception & Psychophysics 1989, 46:146-154.
67. Slotnick S.D., Hopfinger J.B., Klein S.A., Sutter E.E. Darkness beyond the light: Attentional inhibition surrounding the classic spotlight. Neuroreport 2002, 13:773-778.
68. Soto D., Heinke D., Humphreys G.W., Blanco M.J. Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:248-261.
69. Starreveld P.A., Theeuwes J., Mortier K. Response selection in visual search: The influence of response compatibility of nontargets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30:56-78.
70. Treisman A. How the deployment of attention determines what we see. Visual Cognition 2006, 14:411-443.
71. Treisman A., Schmidt H. Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology 1982, 14:107-141.
72. Unsworth N., Heitz R.P., Schrock J.C., Engle R.W. An automated version of the operation span task. Behavioural Research Methods 2005, 37:498-505.
73. Williams L.J. Tunnel vision or general interference? Cognitive load and attentional bias are both important. American Journal of Psychology 1988, 101:171-191.
74. Yantis S., Johnston J.C. On the locus of visual selection: Evidence from focused attention tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1990, 16:135-149.
75. Yeshurun Y., Carrasco M. Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution. Nature 1998, 396:72-75.
76. Yi D.J., Woodman G.F., Widders D., Marois R., Chun M.M. Neural fate of ignored stimuli: Dissociable effects of perceptual and working memory load. Nature Neuroscience 2004, 7:992-996.