Quantifying the sampling error in tree census measurements by volunteers and its effect on carbon stock estimates

Ecological Applications

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 936-943

  Butt, Nathalie ^a,b   Slade, Eleanor ^a   Thompson, Jill ^c   Malhi, Yadvinder ^a   Riutta, Terhi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biomass estimate; Carbon stocks; Citizen science; Data quality; Forest monitoring; Oxfordshire; Tree measurements; United Kingdom; Wytham Woods

Indexed keywords

CARBON;

ALLOMETRY; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CENSUS; DATA QUALITY; DATA SET; DIAMETER; ERROR ANALYSIS; GROWTH RATE; MONITORING; PHYTOMASS;

ARTICLE; CARBON CYCLE; CHEMISTRY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; STATISTICS; TREE; VOLUNTARY WORKER;

CARBON; CARBON CYCLE; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; SELECTION BIAS; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; TREES; VOLUNTARY WORKERS;

ENGLAND; OXFORDSHIRE; UNITED KINGDOM; WYTHAM WOODS;

EID: 84878929121     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/11-2059.1     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Brokaw, N., and J. Thompson. 2000. The h for dbh. Forest Ecology and Management 129:89-91.
2. Bunce, R. G. H. 1968. Biomass and production of trees in a mixed deciduous woodland: I. Girth and height as parameters for the estimation of tree dry weight. Journal of Ecology 56:759-775.
3. Butt, N., G. Campbell, Y. Malhi, M. Morecroft, K. Fenn, and M. Thomas. 2009. Initial results from establishment of a long-term broadleaf monitoring plot at Wytham Woods, Oxford, UK. University of Oxford Report. http://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/publications/downloads/butt09-wythamwoods.pdf
4. Cohn, J. P. 2008. Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience 58:192-197.
5. Condit, R. 1998. Tropical forest census plots: methods and results from Barro Colorado Island, Panama and a comparison with other plots. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
6. Cox, T. E., J. Philippoff, E. Baumgartner, and C. M. Smith. 2012. Expert variability provides perspective on the strengths and weaknesses of citizen-driven intertidal monitoring program. Ecological Applications 22:1201-1212.
7. Darwall, W., and N. Dulvy. 1996. An evaluation of the suitability of non-specialist volunteer researchers for coral reef fish surveys. Mafia Island, Tanzania-a case study. Biological Conservation 78:223-231.
8. Delaney, D. G., C. D. Sperling, C. S. Adams, and B. Leung. 2008. Marine invasive species: validation of citizen science and implications for national monitoring networks. Biological Invasions 10:117-128.
9. Devictor, V., R. Whittaker, and C. Beltrame. 2010. Beyond scarcity: citizen science programmes as useful tools for conservation biogeography. Diversity and Distributions 16:354-362.
10. Dickinson, J. L., B. Zuckerberg, and D. N. Bonter. 2010. Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 41:149-172.
11. Eden, S. 1996. Public participation in environmental policy: considering scientific, counter-scientific and non-scientific contributions. Public Understanding of Science 5:184-204.
12. Fenn, K., Y. Malhi, M. Morecroft, C. Lloyd, and M. Thomas. 2010. Comprehensive description of the carbon cycle of an ancient temperate broadleaved woodland. Biogeosciences Discussions 7:3735-3763.
13. Fitzpatrick, M. C., E. L. Preisser, A. M. Ellison, and J. S. Elkington. 2009. Observer bias and the detection of lowdensity populations. Ecological Applications 19:1973-1679.
14. Foster-Smith, J., and S. Evans. 2003. The value of marine ecological data collected by volunteers. Biological Conservation 113:199-213.
15. Fox, R., Z. Randle, S. Anders, L. Wiffen, and M. Parsons. 2010. Moths count: recording moths for conservation in the UK. Journal of Insect Conservation 15:55-68.
16. Gertner, G. Z. 1990. The sensitivity of measurement error in stand volume estimation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20:800-804.
17. Greenwood, J. J. D. 2007. Citizens, science and bird conservation. Journal of Ornithology 148 (Supplement 1):S77-S124.
18. Henderson, S. 2012. Citizen science comes of age. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10:283.
19. Irwin, A. 2001. Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Understanding of Science 10:1-18.
20. Kirby, K. J., R. C. Thomas, and H. C. Dawkins. 1996. Monitoring of changes in tree and shrub layers in Wytham Woods (Oxfordshire), 1974-1991. Forestry 69:319-334.
21. Lotz, A., and C. R. Allen. 2007. Observer bias in anuran call surveys. Journal of Wildlife Management 71:675-679.
22. Lovell, S., M. Hamer, R. Slotow, and D. Herbert. 2009. An assessment of the use of volunteers for terrestrial invertebrate biodiversity surveys. Biodiversity and Conservation 18:3295-3307.
23. Melson, S. L., M. E. Harmon, J. S. Fried, and J. B. Domingo. 2011. Estimates of live-tree carbon stores in the Pacific Northwest are sensitive to model selection. Carbon Balance and Management 6:2.
24. Milberg, P., J. Bergstedt, J. Fridman, G. Odell, and L. Westerburg. 2008. Observer bias and random variation in vegetation monitoring data. Journal of Vegetation Science 19:633-644.
25. Newman, C., C. D. Buesching, and D. Macdonald. 2003. Validating mammal monitoring methods and assessing the performance of volunteers in wildlife conservation-"Se quis custodiet ipsos custodies?" Biological Conservation 113:189-197.
26. Phillips, D. L., S. L. Brown, P. E. Schroeder, and R. A. Birdsey. 2000. Toward error analysis of large-scale forest carbon budgets. Global Ecology and Biogeography 9:305-313.
27. Rodwell, J. S., editor. 1991. British plant communities. Volume 1: Woodlands and scrub. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
28. RSPB (Royal Society for the Protection of Birds). 2011. www.rspb.org.uk
29. Savill, P. S., C. M. Perrins, K. J. Kirby, and N. Fisher. 2010. Wytham Woods: Oxford's ecological laboratory. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
30. Schmeller, D. S., et al. 2008. Advantages of volunteer-based monitoring in Europe. Conservation Biology 23:307-316.
31. Shetty, P. 2011. Citizen scientists' climate-impact survey wraps up. Nature News. doi:10.1038/nature.2011.9697
32. Szabo, J. K., P. A. Vesk, P. W. J. Baxter, and H. P. Possingham. 2010. Regional avian species declines estimated from volunteer-collected long-term data using List Length Analysis. Ecological Applications 20:2157-2169.
33. Trumbull, D. J., R. Bonney, D. Bascom, and A. Cabral. 2000. Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizenscience project. Science Education 84:265-275.
34. Zianis, D., P. Muukkonen, R. Mäkipää, and M. Mencuccini. 2005. Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe. Silva Fennica 4:1-63.