Observer bias and random variation in vegetation monitoring data

Journal of Vegetation Science

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 633-644

  Milberg, Per ^a   Bergstedt, Johan ^a   Fridman, Jonas ^b   Odell, Gunnar ^b   Westerberg, Lars ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Forest; Observer error; Permanent plot; Statistical power; Sweden

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BOREAL FOREST; DETECTION METHOD; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPECIES OCCURRENCE; VEGETATION COVER; VISUAL ANALYSIS;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

EID: 59649117006     PISSN: 11009233     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3170/2008-8-18423     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Anon. 1983-2002. Ståndortskarteringens databas, SKBAS. http://www-sml.slu.se/sk/skbas.pdf (accessed October 2007).
2. Anon. 2004. Statistica (data analysis software system), version 7. Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, US.
3. Anon. 2007. Markinventeringen, RIS-MI. Swedish Forest Soil Inventory, http://www-markinventeringen.slu.se. (accessed October 2007).
4. Archaux, F., Gosselin, F., Berges, L. & Chevalier, R. 2006. Effects of sampling time, species richness and observer on the exhaustiveness of plant censuses. Journal of Vegetation Science 17: 299-306.
5. Bergfur, J., Carlsson, A.L.M. & Milberg, P. 2004. Phenological changes within a growth season in two semi-natural pastures in southern Sweden. Annales Botanici Fennici 41: 15-25.
6. Bråkenhielm, S. & Liu, Q. 1995. Comparison of field methods in vegetation monitoring. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 79: 75-87.
7. Brandon, A., Spyreas, G., Molano-Flores, B., Carroll, C. & Ellis, J. 2003. Can volunteers provide reliable data for forest vegetation surveys? Natural Areas Journal 23: 254-261.
8. Carlsson, A.L.M., Bergfur, J. & Milberg, P. 2005. Comparison of data from two vegetation monitoring methods in semi-natural grasslands. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 100: 235-248.
9. Ellenberg, H., Weber, H.E., Düll, R., Wirth, V, Werner, W. & Paulißen, D. 1992. Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. 2nd. ed. Scripta Geobotanica 18: 1-258.
10. Elzinga, C.L., Valzer, D.W. & Willoughby, J.W. 1998. Measuring and monitoring plant populations. Bureau of Land Management, Denver, Colorado, USA. BLM/RS/ST-98/005+1730. http://www.blm.gov/nstc/library/pdf/MeasAndMon.pdf (accessed October 2007).
11. Gallegos, Å. 2005. Design and evaluation of a computer aided calibration program for visual estimation of vegetation cover. SLU, Institutionen for skoglig resurshushållning och geomatik, Arbetsrapport 142. www.resgeom.slu.se/resana/NILS/Publikationer/arb-rapp-142.pdf (accessed October 2007).
12. Gotfryd, A. & Hansell, R.I.C. 1985. The impact of observer bias on multivariate analyses of vegetation structure. Oikos 45: 223-234.
13. Gray, A.N. & Azuma, D.L. 2005. Repeatability and implementation of a forest vegetation indicator. Ecological Indicators 5: 57-71.
14. Hägglund, B. 1985. En ny svensk riksskogstaxering. Report 37, Department of Forest Survey, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, SE. (In Swedish with English summary.)
15. Hägglund, B. & Lundmark, J.-E. 1981. Handledning i bonitering med skogshögskolans boniteringssystem. 3 Vols. Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping, SE. (In Swedish.)
16. Hope-Simpson, J.F. 1940. On the errors in the ordinary use of subjective frequency estimations in grassland. Journal of Ecology 28: 193-209.
17. Jonasson, S. 1988. Evaluation of the point intercept method for the estimation of plant biomass. Oikos 52: 101-106.
18. Karlsson, T. 1998. Förteckning över svenska kärlväxter. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 91: 241-560 (In Swedish with English summary.)
19. Kennedy, K. A. & Addison, P.A. 1987. Some considerations for the use of visual estimates of plant cover in biomonitoring. Journal of Ecology 75: 151-157.
20. Kent, M. & Coker, P. 1992. Vegetation description and analysis. A practical approach. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
21. Kercher, S.M., Frieswyk, C.B. & Zedler, J.B. 2003. Effects of sampling teams and estimation methods on the assessment of plant cover. Journal of Vegetation Science 14: 899-906.
22. Kéry, M., Spillmann, J.H., Truong, C. & Holderegger, R. 2006. How biased are estimates of extinction probability in revisitation studies? Journal of Ecology 94: 980-986.
23. Kirby, K.J., Bines, T., Burn, A., Mackintosh, J., Pitkin, P. & Smith, I. 1986. Seasonal and observer differences in vascular plant records from British woodlands. Journal of Ecology 74: 123-131.
24. Klimeš, L. 2003. Scale-dependent variation in visual estimates of grassland plant cover. Journal of Vegetation Science 14: 815-821.
25. Legg, C.J. & Nagy, L 2006. Why most conservation monitoring is, but need not be, a waste of time. Journal of Environmental Management 78: 194-199.
26. Lepš, J. & Hadincová, V. 1992. How reliable are our vegetation analyses? Journal of Vegetation Science 3: 119-124.
27. Lid, J. 1985. Norsk, svensk, fins kflora. Det Norske Samlaget, Oslo, NO.
28. Lindroth, S. (ed.) 1995. Skog och mark i Sverige. Fakta från Riksskogstaxeringen. Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Kommentus förlag, Stockholm, SE. (In Swedish.)
29. Lundmark, J.-E., Odell, G. & Carlsson, E. 1985. Fä ltinstruktion för ståndortskarteringen av permanenta provytor vid riksskogstaxeringen. Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, Institution för Sköglig Marklära, Uppsala, SE.
30. Maxwell, D. & Jennings, S. 2005. Power of monitoring programmes to detect decline and recovery of rare and vulnerable fish. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 25-37.
31. McCune, B., Dey, J.P., Peck, J.E., Cassel, D., Heiman, K., Will-Wolf, S. & Neitlich, P.N. 1997. Repeatability of community data: species richness versus gradient scores in large-scale lichen studies. Bryologist 100: 40-46.
32. McNemar, Q. 1947. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 12: 153-157.
33. Mueller-Dombois, D. & Ellenberg, H. 2002. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. Blackburn Press, Caldwell, NJ, US.
34. Nagy, L., Nagy, J., Legg, C.J., Sales, D.I. & Horsefield, D. 2002. Monotoring vegetation change caused by trampling: a study in the Cairngorms, Scotland. Botanical Journal of Scotland 54: 191-207.
35. Nilsson, C. 1992. Increasing the reliability of vegetation analyses by using a team of two investigators. Journal of Vegetation Science 3: 565.
36. Pollock, J.F. 2006. Detecting population declines over large areas with presence-absence, time-to-encounter, and count survey methods. Conservation Biology 20: 882-892.
37. Ringvall, A., Petersson, H., Ståhl, G. & Lämås, T. 2005. Surveyor consistency in presence/absence sampling for monitoring vegetation in a boreal forest. Forest Ecology and Management 212: 109-117.
38. Scott, W.A. & Hallam, C.J. 2002. Assessing species misidentification rates through quality assurance of vegetation monitoring. Plant Ecology 165: 101-115.
39. Smith, A.D. 1944. A study of the reliability of range vegetation estimates. Ecology 25: 441-448.
40. Ståhl, G. & Odell, G. 1998. Vegetationsförä ndringar i svensk skogsmark mellan 1980- och 90-talet: en studie grundad på ståndortskarteringen. SLU, Institutionen för skoglig resurshushållning och geomatik, Umeå, Arbetsrapport 37. http://www-sml.slu.se/sk/vegfor98.pdf (accessed October 2007).
41. Stapanian, M.A., Cline, S.P. & Cassell, D.L. 1997. Evaluation of a measurement method for forest vegetation in a large-scale ecological survey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 45: 237-257.
42. Strayer, D.L. 1999. Statistical power of presences-absence data to detect population declines. Conservation Biology 13: 1034-1038.
43. Stribling, J.B., Moulton II, S.R. & Lester, G.T. 2003. Determining the quality of taxonomic data. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 22: 621-631.
44. Sykes, J.M., Horrill, A.D. & Mountford, M.D. 1983. Use of visual cover assessments as quantitative estimators of some British woodland taxa. Journal of Ecology 71: 437-450.
45. Tonteri, T. 1990. Inter-observer variation in forest vegetation cover assessments. Silva Fennica 24: 189-196.
46. van Hees, W.W.S. & Mead, B.R. 2000. Ocular estimates of understory vegetation structure in a closed Picea glauca/Betula papyrifera forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 11: 195-200.
47. Vittoz, R & Guisan, A. 2007. How reliable is the monitoring of permanent vegetation plots? Atest with multiple observers Journal of Vegetation Science 18: 413-422.
48. West, N.E. & Hatton, T.J. 1990. Relative influence of observer error and plot randomization on detection of vegetation change. Coenoses 5: 45-49.