Digital video: The impact on children's learning experiences in primary physical education

European Physical Education Review

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 165-182

  O'Loughlin, Joe ^a   Chróinín, Deirdre Ní ^a   O'Grady, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

assessment; digital video; physical education; Primary elementary

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878925455     PISSN: 1356336X     EISSN: 17412749     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1356336X13486050     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Andrade H,Boulay B.The role of rubric-referenced self-assessment in learning to write.TheJournal of Educational Research. 2003;97 (1): 21-34.
2. Andrade HL,Wang X,Du Y, et al.Rubric-referenced self-assessment and self-efficacy for writing.The Journal of Educational Research. 2009;102 (4): 287-301.
3. Beilke JR,Stuve MJ.A teacher's use of digital video with urban middle school students: Expanding definitions of representational literacy.The Teacher Educator. 2004;39 (3): 157-169.
4. Black P,Wiliam D.Inside the black box: raising standards through student assessment.Phi Delta Kappan. 1998;80 (2): 139-148.
5. Burden K,Kuechel TEvaluation Report of the Teaching and Learning with Digital Video Assets Pilot 2003-2004. Coventry, UK: Becta; 2004:.
6. Burn A,Brindley S,Durran J, et al.The rush of images: a research report into digital editing and the moving image.English in Education. 2001;35 (2): 34-47.
7. Cauley KM,McMillan JH.Formative assessment techniques to support student motivation and achievement.The Clearing House. 2010;83 (1): 1-6.
8. Chen DD,Hendrick JL,Lidor R.Enhancing self-controlled learning environments: the use of self-regulated feedback information.Journal of Human Movement Studies. 2002;43:69-86.
9. Condie R,Munro B,Muir D, et alThe Impact of ICT Initiatives in Scottish Schools: Phase 3. Edinburgh: SEED; 2005:.
10. Primary School Curriculum: Physical Education. Dublin: Stationery Office; 1999:.
11. An Evaluation of Curriculum Implementation in Primary Schools. Dublin: Department of Education and Science; 2005:.
12. Dunning D,Heath C,Suls JM.Flawed self-assessment: implications for health, education, and the workplace.Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2004;5 (3): 69-106.
13. Fitzgerald JT,White CB,Gruppen LD.A longitudinal study of self-assessment accuracy.Medical Education. 2003;37 (7): 645-649.
14. Goldman R.Video perspectivity meets wild and crazy teens: a design ethnography.Cambridge Journal of Education. 2004;34(2):157-178.
15. Hallam S,Kiston A,Peffers J, et alEvaluation of Project 1 of the AiFL Development Programme: Support for Professional Practice in Formative Assessment. London: Institute of Education (IoE), University of London; 2004:.
16. Hamlin B.Motor competency and video analysis.Teaching Elementary Physical Education. 2005;16 (5): 8-13.
17. Hay PJThe Handbook of Physical Education. Kirk DMacdonald DO'Sullivan M, ed. London: Sage; 2005:312-325.
18. Hazen A,Johnstone C,Garry ML, et al.A videotaping feedback package for improving skills of youth competitive swimmers.The Sports Psychologist. 1990;4(3):213-227.
19. Herbert EP,Landin D.Effects of a learning model and augmented feedback on tennis skill acquisition.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 1994;65 (3): 250-257.
20. Hoffenberg H,Handler M.Digital video goes to school.Learning & Leading with Technology. 2001;29 (8): 10-15.
21. Jambor EA,Weekes EM.Videotape feedback: make it more effective.Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 1995;6(2):48-50.
22. Janelle CM,Barba DA,Frehlich SG.Maximizing performance feedback effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 1997;68 (4): 269-279.
23. Kearney M,Schuck SProceedings of the 2003 Apple University Consortium Conference, Sydney: Australia. Smythe N, ed. 2003:.
24. Kearney M,Schuck S.Spotlight on authentic learning: student developed digital video projects.Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2006;22 (2): 189-208.
25. KibbleSCayleyS (2003) Using video cameras in physical education. Available at: http://education.exeter.ac.uk/research/pe_ict_event/downloads/steve_kibble/Using%20Video%20Cameras%20in%20Physical%20Education.pdf(accessed 14 January 2011).
26. Kitsantis A,Reisner RA,Doster J.Developing self-regulated learners: goal setting, self evaluation, and organizational signals during acquisition of procedural skills.The Journal of Experimental Education. 2004;72 (4): 269-288.
27. Klenowski V.Student self-evaluation processes in student-centred teaching and learning contexts of Australia and England.Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice. 1995;2 (2): 145-154.
28. Lidor R.Developing meta-cognitive behaviour in physical education classes: the use of task-pertinent learning strategies.Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2004;9(1):55-71.
29. McDonald B,Boud D.The impact of self-assessment on achievement: the effects of self-assessment training on performance in external examination.Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice. 2003;10 (2): 209-220.
30. McMillan JH,Hearn J.Student self-assessment: the key to stronger motivation and higher achievement.Educational Horizons. 2008;87 (1): 40-49.
31. McPhail A,Halbert J.We had to do intelligent thinking during recent PE: students' and teachers' experiences of assessment for learning in post-primary physical education.Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. 2010;17 (1): 23-39.
32. Merriam SBQualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1998:.
33. Miles MB,Huberman AMQualitative Data Analysis. 1994) Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994:.
34. Mohnsen BSUsing Technology in Physical Education. 2010) Using Technology in Physical Education, 7th ed. Cerritos, CA: Bonnie's Fitware Inc.Cerritos, CA: Bonnie's Fitware Inc; 2010:.
35. Assessment for Learning - Report on Phase 2 of the Developmental Initiative. Dublin: National Council for Curriculum and Assessment; 2005:.
36. Assessment in the Primary School Curriculum: Guidelines for Schools. Dublin: National Council for Curriculum and Assessment; 2007:.
37. Neuman WLSocial research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. 1994) Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches, 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 1994:.
38. New J.Film school: the silver screen inspires young minds to think big.Edutopia. 2006;1 (9): 20-23.
39. Ní Chroinin D,Cosgrave C.Implementing formative assessment in primary physical education: teacher perspectives and experiences.Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2012;18 (2): 219-233.
40. Parker D.Show us a story: an overview of recent research and resource development work at the British Film Institute.English in Education. 2002;36 (1): 38-44.
41. Patton MQualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sag; 2002:.
42. Phillips DA,Zimmerman MCompetence Considered. Sternberg RJKolligian JJ, ed. London: Yale University Press; 1990:41-66.
43. Reid M,Burn A,Parker DEvaluation Report of the BECTA Digital Video Pilot Project. Coventry: BECTA; 2002:.
44. Robson CReal World Research. 2002) Real World Research, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Oxford: Blackwell; 2002:.
45. Rolheiser C,Ross JAPlain Talk about Kids. Small RDThomas A, ed. Covington, Los Angeles: Centre for Development and Learning; 2001:43-57.
46. Ross JA.The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment.Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation. 2006;11 (10).
47. Ross JA,Hogaboam-Gray A,Rolheiser C.Student self-evaluation in grade 5-6 mathematics: effects on problem solving achievement.Educational Assessment. 2002;8 (1): 43-59.
48. Ryan S.Digital video: using technology to improve learner motivation.Modern English Teacher. 2002;11 (2): 72-75.
49. Sadler DR.Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems.Instructional Science. 1989;18 (2): 119-144.
50. Schwartz DL,Hartman KVideo Research in the Learning Sciences. Goldman RPea RBarron B, ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007:335-348.
51. Shepard LA.The role of assessment in a learning culture.Education Researcher. 2000;29 (7): 4-14.
52. Siedentop D,Tannehill DDeveloping Teaching Skills in Physical Education. 2000) Developing Teaching Skills in Physical Education, 4th ed. Mount View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.Mount View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company; 2000:.
53. Stiggins RJStudent-involved Classroom Assessment. 2001) Student-involved Classroom Assessment, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall; 2001:.
54. Strauss A,Corbin JBasics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998:.
55. Torrance H,Pryor J.Developing formative assessment in the classroom: using action research to explore and modify theory.British Educational Research Journal. 2001;26 (5): 615-631.
56. Ward M,MacRae H,Schlachta C, et al.Resident self-assessment of operative performance.American Journal of Surgery. 2003;185(6):521-524.
57. Weir T,Connor S.The use of digital video in physical education.Technology, Pedagogy and Education. 2009;18 (2): 155-171.
58. Wood JBody and Mind: A Report on the Use of ICT in PE. London: Becta; 2005:.
59. Wragg EAssessment and Learning in the Primary School. London: Routledge; 2001:.
60. Zimmerman BJSelf-regulated Learning and Academic Achievement Theory, Research, and Practice: Progress in Cognitive Development Research. Zimmerman BJSchunk DH, ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1989:1-26.
61. Zimmerman BJSelf-regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications. Schunk DH, ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1994:3-25.
62. Zimmerman BJ,Bonner S,Kovach RDeveloping Self-regulated Learners: Beyond Achievement to Self-efficacy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1996:.