Leaving a spinal unit and returning to the wider community: An interpretative phenomenological analysis

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 35, Issue 14, 2013, Pages 1164-1173

  Nunnerley, J L ^a,b   Hay Smith, E J C ^c   Dean, S G ^d  

^a Burwood Academy of Independent Living   (New Zealand)

^b BURWOOD HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Community reintegration; Interpretative phenomenological analysis; Participation; Spinal cord injury

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONVALESCENCE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW ZEALAND; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; SOCIOECONOMICS; SPINAL CORD INJURY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW ZEALAND; PATIENT DISCHARGE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SPINAL CORD INJURIES;

EID: 84878907140     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2012.723789     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. O'Conner PJ. Survival after spinal cord injury in Australia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:37-47.
2. DeVivo MJ, Krause JS, Lammertse DP. Recent trends in mortality and causes of death among persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:1411-1419.
3. Frankel HL, Coll JR, Charlifue SW, Whiteneck GG, Gardner BP, Jamous MA, Krishnan KR, et al. Long-term survival in spinal cord injury: a fifty year investigation. Spinal Cord 1998;36:266-274.
4. Wyndaele M, Wyndaele JJ. Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology of spinal cord injury: what learns a worldwide literature survey? Spinal Cord 2006;44:523-529.
5. Charlifue S, Gerhart K. Community integration in spinal cord injury of long duration. NeuroRehabilitation 2004;19:91-101.
6. Forcheimer M, Tate DG. Enhancing community re-integration following spinal cord injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 2004;19:103-113.
7. Hall KM, et al. The Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART): metric properties and scoring. Topics Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil 1998;4(1):16-30.
8. Kennedy P, Lude P, Taylor N. Quality of life, social participation, appraisals and coping post spinal cord injury: a review of four community samples. Spinal Cord 2006;44:95-105.
9. McKinley WO, Meade MA. Community integration following SCI. NeuroRehabilitation 2004;19:79-80.
10. Dijkers M. Community integration: conceptual issues and measurement approaches in rehabilitation research. Topics Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil 1998;4(1):1-15.
11. DeJong G. Independent living: from social movement to analytic paradigm. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979;60:435-446.
12. Yasuda S, Wehman P, Targett P, Cifu DX, West M. Return to work after spinal cord injury: a review of recent research. NeuroRehabilitation 2002;17:177-186.
13. Slater D, Meade MA. Participation in recreation and sports for persons with spinal cord injury: review and recommendations. NeuroRehabilitation 2004;19:121-129.
14. Tasiemski T, Bergström E, Savic G, Gardner BP. Sports, recreation and employment following spinal cord injury-a pilot study. Spinal Cord 2000;38:173-184.
15. Bocarro J, Stable J. Finding the right P.A.T.H: exploring the familial relationships and the role of a community TR program in the initial years after a spinal cord injury. Ther Recreation J 2003;37(1):58-72.
16. Isaksson G, Skär L, Lexell J. Women's perception of changes in the social network after a spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:1013-1021.
17. Whiteneck G, Tate D, Charlifue S. Predicting Community Reintegration After Spinal Cord Injury From Demographic and Injury Characteristics. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:1485-1491.
18. Song HY. Modeling social reintegration in persons with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:131-141.
19. Boschen KA, Tonack M, Gargaro J. Long-term adjustment and community reintegration following spinal cord injury. Int J Rehabil Res 2003;26:157-164.
20. Carpenter C. The experience of spinal cord injury: the individual's perspective-implications for rehabilitation practice. Phys Ther 1994;74:614-628; discussion 628.
21. Carpenter C, Forman B. Provision of community programs for clients with spinal cord injury: use of qualitative research to evaluate the role of the British Columbia Paraplegic Association. Topics Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil 2004;9(4):57-72.
22. Whiteneck G, Meade MA, Dijkers M, Tate DG, Bushnik T, Forchheimer MB. Environmental factors and their role in participation and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1793-1803.
23. Smith JA, Flowers P, Larkin M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research. London: Sage; 2009.
24. Smith JA, Jarman M, Osborn M. Doing Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Murray M, Chamberlain K, editors. Qualitative health psychology: theories and methods. London: Sage; 1999.
25. Smith JA. Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: using interpretive phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychol Health 1996;11:261-271.
26. Biering-Sorensen F, Scheuringer M, Baumberger M, Charlifue SW, Post MW, Montero F, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. Developing core sets for persons with spinal cord injuries based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a way to specify functioning. Spinal Cord 2006;44:541-546.
27. Dixon GS, Danesh JN, Caradoc-Davies TH. Epidemiology of spinal cord injury in New Zealand. Neuroepidemiology 1993;12:88-95.
28. Acland RH. Incidence and prevention of SCI in New Zealand. Iceland: ISCOS; 2007.
29. Smith JA. Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In: Smith JA, Hare R, Van Langerhove L, editors. Rethinking methods in psychology. London: Sage Publication; 1995. pp 9-26.
30. Smith JA, Osborn M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Breakwell G, editor. Doing social psychology research. Oxford: Blackwell; 2004. pp 229-254.
31. Dean SG, Smith JA, Payne S. Low back pain: exploring the meaning of exercise management through interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). In: Finlay L, Ballinger C, editors. Qualitative research for allied health professionals: challenging choices. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2006. pp 139-155.
32. Smith JA, Osborn M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Smith JA, editor. Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. London, Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2003. pp 51-80.
33. Smith JA, Dunworth F. Qualitative methods in the study of development. In: Connolly K, Valsiner J, editors. The handbook of developmental psychology. London: Sage; 2003. pp 603-621.
34. Mays N, Pope C. Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ 1995;311:109-112.
35. Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Outcomes following traumatic spinal cord injury: Clinical practice guidelines for health-care professionals. Washington (DC): Paralyzed Veterans of America; 1999.
36. Sand A, Karlberg I, Kreuter M. Spinal cord injured persons' conceptions of hospital care, rehabilitation, and a new life situation. Scand J Occup Ther 2006;13:183-192.
37. Hanson S, et al. The relationship between coping and adjustment after spinal cord injury: a 5-year follow-up study. Rehabil Psychol 1993;38(1):41-54.
38. Cott CA. Client-centred rehabilitation: client perspectives. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:1411-1422.
39. Nicholls J, Collins F, Sinnott KA. Development, implementation and outcomes of an onsite transitional rehabilitation programme at the Burwood Spinal Unit. In: Australian and New Zealand Spinal Cord Society annual scientific meeting. 2010. Adelaide Convention Centre.
40. Lohone V, Severinsson E. Hope and despair the awakening of hope following acute spinal injury - an interpretative study. Int J Nurs Stud 2004;41:881-890.
41. Smith B, Sparkes AC. Men, sport, spinal cord injury, and narratives of hope. Soc Sci Med 2005;61:1095-1105.
42. Wiles R, Cott C, Gibson BE. Hope, expectations and recovery from illness: a narrative synthesis of qualitative research. J Adv Nurs 2008;64:564-573.
43. Kortte KB, Gilbert M, Gorman P, Wegener ST. Positive psychological variables in the prediction of life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Rehabil Psychol 2010;55:40-47.
44. Elliott TR, Richards JS. Living with the facts, negotiating the terms: Unrealistic beliefs, denial, and adjustment in the first year of acquired physical disability. J Pers Interpers Loss 1999;4:361-381.
45. Morse JM, O'Brien B. Preserving self: from victim, to patient, to disabled person. J Adv Nurs 1995;21:886-896.
46. Papadimitriou C, Stone DA. Addressing existential disruption in traumatic spinal cord injury: a new approach to human temporality in inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:2121-2133.
47. Durie M. Mauri Ora: The dynamics of Maori health. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
48. Clarke AM. In: First National Conference of the Spinal Network. Christchurch, New Zealand: 2000.
49. Hammell KW. Experiences of rehabilitation following spinal cord injury: a meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Spinal Cord 2007;45:260-274.
50. Inman C. Effectiveness of spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 1999;13 Suppl 1:25-31.