Predicting community reintegration after spinal cord injury from demographic and injury characteristics

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 80, Issue 11, 1999, Pages 1485-1491

  Whiteneck, Gale ^a   Tate, Denise ^b   Charlifue, Susan ^a  

^a CRAIG HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DISABILITY; ECONOMIC ASPECT; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INJURY SCALE; LOCOMOTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OCCUPATION; PREDICTION; SOCIOLOGY; SPINAL CORD INJURY;

EID: 0032700411     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90262-9     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Tate DG, editor. Community reintegration. Part 1. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1998;4(1):1-72.
2. Nosek MA, Laurie WJ. Community integration of women with spinal cord injuries: an examination of psychological, social, vocational, and environmental factors. Community reintegration, part 2. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1998;4(2):41-55.
3. DeVivo M, Richards JS. Community reintegration and quality of life following spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1992;30:108-12.
4. Harrison C, Kuric J. Community reintegration of SCI persons: problems and perceptions. SCI Nurs 1989;6:44-7.
5. Westgren N, Levi R. Motherhood after traumatic spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1994;32:517-23.
6. Dijkers M. Community integration: conceptual issues and measurement approaches in rehabilitation research. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1998;4(1):1-17.
7. Condeluci A, Cooperman S, Seif BA. Independent living: Settings and supports. In: Ylvisaker M, Gobble EMR, editors. Community re-entry for head-injury adults. Boston: College-Hill Press, 1987. p. 83-107.
8. Townsend E, Ryan B. Assessing independence in community living. Can J Public Health 1991;82:52-7.
9. World Health Organization. International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps. Geneva: WHO; 1980.
10. World Health Organization. ICIDH-2 Beta 1 draft. Geneva: WHO; 1997.
11. Institute of Medicine. Disability in America. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1991.
12. Institute of Medicine. Enabling America: assessing the role of rehabilitation science and engineering. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1997.
13. Hall KM, Dijkers M, Whiteneck G, Brooks CA, Krause JS. The Craig handicap assessment and reporting technique (CHART): metric properties and scoring. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1998;4(1):16-30.
14. Tate DG, Forchheimer M. Enhancing community reintegration after inpatient rehabilitation for persons with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1998;4(1):42-55.
15. Hansen NS, Forchheimer M, Tate DG, Luera G. Relationship among community reintegration, coping strategies, and life satisfaction in a sample of persons with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1998;4(1):56-72.
16. Whiteneck G, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, Overholser JD, Richardson N. Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73: 519-26.
17. Krause JS. Longitudinal changes in adjustment after spinal cord injury: a 15-year study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:564-8.
18. Trieschmann RB. Psychosocial research in spinal cord injury: the state of the art. Paraplegia 1991;30:58-60.
19. Fuhrer M, Rintala D, Hart K, Clearman R, Young ME. Relationship of life satisfaction to impairment, disability, and handicap among persons with spinal cord injury living in the community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:552-7.