A simple feature combination method based on dominant sets

Pattern Recognition

Volumn 46, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 3129-3139

  Hou, Jian ^a   Pelillo, Marcello ^b  

^a BOHAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CA' FOSCARI UNIVERSITY OF VENICE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Dominant sets; Feature combination; Kernel accuracy; Object classification

Indexed keywords

DISCRIMINATIVE POWER; DOMINANT SET; EXPECTED KERNELS; FEATURE COMBINATION; KERNEL ACCURACY; OBJECT CLASSIFICATION; OPTIMIZATION BASED METHODS; WEIGHTING SCHEME;

PATTERN RECOGNITION; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EXPERIMENTS;

EID: 84878889054     PISSN: 00313203     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2013.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. F.R. Bach, Exploring large feature spaces with hierarchical multiple kernel learning, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2008, pp. 105-112.
2. A. Barla, F. Odone, A. Verri, Histogram intersection kernel for image classification, in: International Conference on Image Processing, 2003, pp. 513-516.
3. L. Bo, X. Ren, D. Fox, Kernel descriptors for visual recognition, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2003, pp. 244-252.
4. A. Bosch, A. Zisserman, X. Munoz, Representing shape with a spatial pyramid kernel, in: ACM International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval, 2007, pp. 401-408.
5. H. Cai, F. Yan, K. Mikolajczyk, Learning weights for codebook in image classification and retrieval, in: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2010, pp. 2320-2327.
6. C. Cortes, M. Mohri, A. Rostamizadeh, Learning non-linear combinations of kernels, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2009, pp. 396-404.
7. N. Dalal, B. Triggs, Histogram of oriented gradients for human detection, in: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005, pp. 886-893.
8. L. Fei-Fei, R. Fergus, P. Perona, Learning generative visual models from few training examples: an incremental Bayesian approach tested on 101 object categories, in: CVPR Workshop on Generative-Model Based Vision, 2004, p. 178.
9. L. Fei-Fei, P. Perona, A Bayesian hierarchical model for learning natural scene categories, in: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005, pp. 524-531.
10. F. Frommlet Tag SNP selection based on clustering according to dominant sets found using replicator dynamics Advances in Data Analysis and Classification 4 2010 65 83
11. P. Gehler, S. Nowozin, On feature combination for multiclass object classification, in: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2009, pp. 221-228.
12. R. Hamid, S. Maddi, A.Y. Johnson, A.F. Bobick, I.A. Essa, and C. Isbell A novel sequence representation for unsupervised analysis of human activities Artificial Intelligence 173 2009 1221 1244
13. J. Hou, B.P. Zhang, N.M. Qi, Y. Yang, Evaluating feature combination in object classification, in: International Symposium on Visual Computing, 2011, pp. 597-606.
14. L.L. Jia, L. Fei-Fei, What, where and who? Classifying events by scene and object recognition, in: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2007, pp. 1-8.
15. A. Kumar, C. Sminchisescu, Support kernel machines for object recognition, in: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2007, pp. 1-8.
16. G. Lanckriet, N. Cristianini, P. Bartlett, L. Ghaoui, and M. Jordan Learning the kernel matrix with semidefinite programming Journal of Machine Learning Research 5 2004 27 72
17. S. Lazebnik, C. Schmid, J. Ponce, Beyond bags of features: spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natural scene categories, in: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2006, pp. 2169-2178.
18. Y.Y. Lin, T.L. Liu, C.S. Fuh, Local ensemble kernel learning for object category recognition, in: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2007, pp. 1-8.
19. D.G. Lowe Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints International Journal of Computer Vision 60 2004 91 110
20. M.E. Nilsback, A. Zisserman, A visual vocabulary for flower classification, in: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2006, pp. 1447-1454.
21. M.E. Nilsback, A. Zisserman, Automated flower classification over a large number of classes, in: Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 2008, pp. 722-729.
22. T. Ojala, M. Pietikainen, and T. Maenpaa Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analsis and Machine Intelligence 24 2002 971 987
23. A. Oliva, and A. Torralba Modeling the shape of the scene a holistic representation of the spatial envelope International Journal of Computer Vision 42 2001 145 175
24. M. Pavan, M. Pelillo, A graph-theoretic approach to clustering and segmentation, in: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003, pp. 145-152.
25. M. Pavan, and M. Pelillo Dominant sets and pairwise clustering IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analsis and Machine Intelligence 29 2007 167 172
26. S. Rota Bulò, M. Pelillo, A game-theoretic approach to hypergraph clustering, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2009, pp. 1571-1579.
27. S. Rota Bulò, M. Pelillo, and I.M. Bomze Graph-based quadratic optimization a fast evolutionary approach Computer Vision and Image Understanding 115 2011 984 995
28. P. Schuffler, T. Fuchs, C. Ong, V. Roth, J. Buhmann, Computational TMA analysis and cell nucleus classification of renal cell carcinoma, in: 32 Annual Symposium of the German Pattern Recognition Society, 2010, pp. 202-211.
29. E. Shechtman, M. Irani, Matching local self-similarities across images and videos, in: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2007, pp. 1-8.
30. A. Torsello, S. Rota Bulò, M. Pelillo, Grouping with asymmetric affinities: a game-theoretic perspective, in: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2006, pp. 292-299.
31. A. Torsello, S. Rota Bulò, M. Pelillo, Beyond partitions: allowing overlapping groups in pairwise clustering, in: International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2008, pp. 1-4.
32. S. Tulyakov, S. Jaeger, V. Govindaraju, and D. Doermann Review of classifier combination methods S. Marinai, H. Fujisawa, Machine Learning in Document Analysis and Recognition Studies in Computational Intelligence vol. 90 2008 Springer Berlin 361 386
33. A. Ulas, R. Duin, U. Castellani, M. Loog, M. Bicego, V. Murino, M. Bellani, S. Cerruti, M. Tansella, P. Brambilla, Dissimilarity-based detection of schizophrenia, in: ICPR Workshop on Pattern Recognition Challenges in fMRI Neuroimaging, 2010, pp. 32-35.
34. M. Varma, B.R. Babu, More generality in efficient multiple kernel learning, in: International Conference on Machine Learning, 2009, pp. 1065-1072.
35. M. Varma, D. Ray, Learning the discriminative power-invariance trade-off, in: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2007, pp. 1-8.
36. M. Varma, and A. Zisserman A statistical approach to texture classification from single images Image and Vision Computing 62 2005 61 81
37. S.V.N. Vishwanathan, Z. Sun, N.T. Ampornpunt, M. Varma, Multiple kernel learning and the SMO algorithm, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2010, pp. 2361-2369.
38. M. Wang, Z.L. Ye, Y. Wang, and S.X. Wang Dominant sets clustering for image retrieval Signal Processing 88 2008 2843 2849
39. J.X. Wu, J.M. Rehg, Beyond the Euclidean distance: creating effective visual codebooks using the histogram intersection kernel, in: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2009, pp. 630-637.
40. J.J. Yang, Y.N. Li, Y.H. Tian, L.Y. Duan, W. Gao, Group-sensitive multiple kernel learning for object categorization, in: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2009, pp. 436-443.
41. X. Yang, H. Liu, and L.J. Latecki Contour-based object detection as dominant set computation Pattern Recognition 45 2012 1927 1936