Differential effects of spaced vs. massed training in long-term object-identity and object-location recognition memory

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 250, Issue , 2013, Pages 102-113

  Bello Medina, Paola C ^a   Sánchez Carrasco, Livia ^a,b   González Ornelas, Nadia R ^a,b,c   Jeffery, Kathryn J ^c   Ramírez Amaya, Víctor ^a  

^a CUCBA   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Declarative memory; Distributed learning; Object representation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LABORATORY TEST; MALE; MASSED TRAINING; MEMORY TEST; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; RECOGNITION; SPACED TRAINING; TRAINING;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; MALE; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84878697678     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.04.047     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Milner B., Penfield W. The effect of hippocampal lesions on recent memory. Transactions of the American Neurological Association 1955, 80:42-48.
2. Milner B. Disorders of learning and memory after temporal lobe lesions in man. Clinical Neurosurgery 1972, 19:421-446.
3. Cohen N.J., Squire L.R. Preserved learning and retention of pattern-analyzing skill in amnesia: dissociation of knowing how and knowing that. Science 1980, 210:207-210.
4. Ullman M.T. Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model. Cognition 2004, 92:231-237.
5. Gabrieli J.D. Memory systems analyses of mnemonic disorders in aging and age-related diseases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1996, 93:13534-13540.
6. Winters B.D., Saksida L.M., Bussey T.J. Implications of animal object memory research for human amnesia. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:2251-2261.
7. Aggleton J.P. One-trial object-recognition by rats. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1985, 37:279-294.
8. Ennaceur A., Delacour J. A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. 1: Behavioral data. Behavioural Brain Research 1988, 31:47-59.
9. Dix S., Aggleton J. Extending the spontaneous preference test of recognition: evidence of object-location and object-context recognition. Behavioural Brain Research 1999, 99:191-200.
10. Ennaceur A., Neave N., Aggleton J.P. Spontaneus object recognition and object location memory in rats: the effects of lesions in the cingulate cortices, the medial prefrontal cortex, the cingulum bundle and the fornix. Experimental Brain Research 1997, 113:509-519.
11. Eacott M.J., Gaffan E.A. The roles of perirhinal cortex, postrhinal cortex, and the fornix in memory for objects, contexts, and events in the rat. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. B, Comparative and Physiological Psychology 2005, 58:202-217.
12. Warburton E.C., Brown M.W. Findings from animals concerning when interactions between perirhinal cortex, hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex are necessary for recognition memory. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:2262-2272.
13. Jurado-Berbel P., Costa-Miserachs D., Torras-Garcia M., Coll-Andreu M., Portell-Cortés I. Standard object recognition memory and "what" and "where" components: Improvement by post-training epinephrine in highly habituated rats. Behavioural Brain Research 2010, 207:44-50.
14. Mumby D.G., Glenn M.J., Nesbitt C., Kyriazis D.A. Dissociation in retrograde memory for object discriminations and object recognition in rats with perirhinal cortex damage. Behavioural Brain Research 2002, 132:215-226.
15. Mumby D.G., Tremblay A., Lecluse V., Lehmann H. Hippocampal damage and anterograde object recognition in rats after long retention intervals. Hippocampus 2005, 15:1050-1056.
16. Commins S., Cunningham L., Harvey D., Walsh D. Massed but not spaced training impairs spatial memory. Behavioural Brain Research 2003, 139:215-223.
17. Anderson M.J., Jablonski S.A., Klimas D.B. Spaced initial stimulus familiarization enhances novelty preference in Long-Evans rats. Behavioural Processes 2008, 78:481-486.
18. Ebbinghaus H. Über das Gedächtnis. Untersuchungen zur experimentellen Psychologie [Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology Translated by Henry A Ruger, Clara E Bussenius in 1913, found in "Classics in the history of psychology". An internet resource developed by Christopher D. Green, York University, Toronto, Ontario]. Trans. Henry A Ruger, Clara E Bussenius. Leipzig, Germany: Duncker & Humblot; 1885 [Section 34].
19. Greene R.L. Spacing effects in memory: evidence for a two-process account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, and Cognition 1989, 15:371-377.
20. Ennaceur A. One-trial object recognition in rats and mice: Methodological and theoretical issues. Behavioural Brain Research 2010, 215:244-254.
21. Hardt O., Einarsson E.O., Nader K. A bridge over troubled water: reconsolidation as a link between cognitive and neuroscientific memory research traditions. Annual Review of Psychology 2010, 61:141-167.
22. Davies S., Renaudineau S., Poirer R., Poucet B., Save E., Laroche S. The formation and stability of recognition memory: what happens upon recall?. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 2010, 4:177-192.
23. Wickelgren W.A. Single-trace theory of memory dynamics. Memory & Cognition 1974, 2:775-780.
24. Kelley P.A. Making minds: What's wrong with education and what should we do about it? 2007, Routledge, London, UK.
25. Kramár E.A., Babayan A.H., Gavin C.F., Cox C.D., Jafari M., Gall C.M., et al. Synaptic evidence for the efficacy of spaced learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2012, 109:5121-5126.
26. Naqib F., Sossin W.S., Farah C.A. Molecular determinants of the spacing effect. Neural Plasticity 2012, 58:1291.
27. Josselyn S.A., Shi C., Carlezon W.A., Neve R.L., Nestler E.J., Davis M. Long-term memory is facilitated by cAMP response element-binding protein overexpression in the amygdala. Journal of Neuroscience 2001, 21:2404-2412.
28. Scharf M.T., Woo N.H., Lattal K.M., Young J.Z., Nguyen P.V., Abel T. Protein synthesis is required for the enhancement of long-term potentiation and long-term memory by spaced training. Journal of Neurophysiology 2002, 87:2770-2777.
29. Genoux D., Haditsch U., Knobloch M., Michalon A., Storm D., Mansuy I.M. Protein phosphatase 1 is a molecular constraint on learning and memory. Nature 2002, 418:970-975.
30. Müller U., Carew T.J. Serotonin induces temporally and mechanistically distinct phases phases of persistent PKA activity in Aplysia sensory neurons. Neuron 1998, 21:1423-1434.
31. Sutton M.A., Carew T.J. Parallel molecular pathways mediate expression of distinct forms of intermediate-term facilitation at tail sensory-motor synapses in Aplysia. Neuron 2000, 26:219-231.
32. Farah C.A., Weatherill D., Dunn T.W., Sossin W.S. PKC differentially translocates during spaced and massed training in Aplysia. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29:10281-10286.
33. Sugita S., Baxter D.A., Byrne J.H. Modulation of a cAMP/protein kinasa A cascade by protein kinase C in sensory neurons of Aplysia. Journal of Neuroscience 1997, 17:7237-7244.
34. Guzowski J.F., Miyashita T., Chawla M.K., Sanderson J., Maes L.I., Houston F.P., et al. Recent behavioral history modifies coupling between cell activity and Arc gene transcription in hippocampal CA1 neurons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103:1077-1082.
35. Okuno H., Akashi K., Ishii Y., Yagishita-Kyo N., Suzuki K., Nonaka M., et al. Inverse synaptic tagging of inactive synapses via dynamic interaction of Arc/Arg3.1 with CaMKIIβ. Cell 2012, 149:886-898.
36. Guzowski J.F., McNaughton B.L., Barnes C.A., Worley P.F. Imaging neural activity with temporal and cellular resolution using FISH. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2001, 11:579-584.
37. Plath N., Ohana O., Dammermann B., Errington M.L., Schmitz D., Gross C., et al. Arc/Arg3.1 is essential for the consolidation of synaptic plasticity and memories. Neuron 2006, 52:437-444.
38. Ungerleider L.G., Mishkin M. Two cortical systems. Analysis of visual behavior 1982, vol. 1:549-586.
39. Pennick M.R., Rajesh K.K. Specialization and integration of brain responses to object recognition and location detection. Brain and Behavior 2011, 2:6-14.
40. Ho J.W., Narduzzo K.E., Outram A., Tinsley C.J., Henley J.M., Warburton E.C. Contributions of area Te2 to rat recognition memory. Learning & Memory 2011, 18:493-501.
41. Tees R.C. The effects of posterior parietal and posterior temporal cortical lesions on multimodal spatial and nonspatial competencies in rats. Behavioural Brain Research 1999, 106:13-23.
42. Wang Q., Sporns O., Burkhalter A. Network analysis of corticocortical connections reveals ventral and dorsal processing streams in mouse visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2012, 13:4386-4399.
43. Kerr K.M., Agster K.L., Furtak S.C., Burwell R.D. Functional neuroanatomy of the parahippocampal region: the lateral and medial entorhinal areas. Hippocampus 2007, 17:697-708.
44. Deshmukh S.S., Knierim J.J. Representation of non-spatial and spatial information in the lateral entorhinal cortex. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 2011, 5:69.
45. McKenzie S., Eichenbaum H. Consolidation and reconsolidation: two lives of memories?. Neuron 2011, 71:224-233.
46. McGaugh J.L. Memory - a century of consolidation. Science 2000, 287:248-251.
47. Dudai Y. The neurobiology of consolidations, or, how stable is the engram?. Annual Review of Psychology 2004, 55:51-86.
48. Moscovitch M., Nadel L., Winocur G., Gilboa A., Rosenbaum R.S. The cognitive neuroscience of remote episodic, semantic and spatial memory. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2006, 16:179-190.
49. Nader K., Schafe G.E., LeDoux J.E. The labile nature of consolidation theory. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2000, 1:216-219.
50. Sevenster D., Beckers T., Kindt M. Retrieval per se is not sufficient to trigger reconsolidation of human fear memory. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 2012, 97:338-345.
51. Winters B.D., Tucci M.C., Jacklin D.L., Reid J.M., Newsome J. On the dynamic nature of the engram: evidence for circuit-level reorganization of object memory traces following reactivation. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31:17719-17728.
52. Sutherland G.R., McNaughton B. Memory trace reactivation in hippocampal and neocortical neuronal ensembles. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2000, 10:180-186.
53. Ramírez-Amaya V., Vazdarjanova A., Mikhael D., Rosi S., Worley P.F., Barnes C.A. Spatial exploration-induced Arc mRNA and protein expression: evidence for selective, network-specific reactivation. Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25:1761-1768.
54. Sara S.J. Retrieval and reconsolidation: toward a neurobiology of remembering. Learning & Memory 2000, 7(2):73-84.
55. Foster D.J., Wilson M.A. Reverse replay of behavioural sequences in hippocampal place cells during the awake state. Nature 2006, 440:680-683.
56. Rekart J.L., Sandoval C.J., Bermudez-Rattoni F., Routtenberg A. Remodeling of hippocampal mossy fibers is selectively induced seven days after the acquisition of a spatial but not a cued reference memory task. Learning & Memory 2007, 14:416-421.
57. Rasch B., Born J. Maintaining memories by reactivation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2007, 17:698-703.
58. Bello-Medina P., Ramirez-Amaya V. Hippocampal granular neuron recruitment during the evocation of a recent or remote object recognition memory. Neuroscience Meeting Planner 2010, Society for Neuroscience, San Diego, CA.