Hippocampal damage and anterograde object-recognition in rats after long retention intervals

Hippocampus

Volumn 15, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1050-1056

  Mumby, Dave G ^a   Tremblay, Annie ^a   Lecluse, Valerie ^a   Lehmann, Hugo ^a  

^a and Applied Physiology   (Canada)

Author keywords

Exploratory behaviour; Nonspatial memory; Novelty preference; Object recognition; Open field

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTEROGRADE AMNESIA; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY; BRAIN DAMAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; LONG TERM MEMORY; MALE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MENTAL TEST; NEUROTOXICITY; NONHUMAN; OPEN FIELD BEHAVIOR; OPEN FIELD TEST; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; RAT STRAIN; SAMPLING; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

AMNESIA, ANTEROGRADE; ANIMALS; BRAIN DISEASES; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; HIPPOCAMPUS; LEARNING; MALE; N-METHYLASPARTATE; RATS; RATS, LONG-EVANS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 30344461920     PISSN: 10509631     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20122     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aggleton JP, Brown MW. 1999. Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal-anterior thalamic axis. Behav Brain Sci 22:425-444.
2. Aggleton JP, Shaw C. 1996. Amnesia and recognition memory: a re-analysis of psychometric data. Neuropsychologia 34:51-62.
3. Aggleton JP, Keen S, Warburton EC, Bussey TJ. 1997. Extensive cytotoxic lesions involving both the rhinal cortices and area TE impair recognition but spare spatial alternation in the rat. Brain Res Bull 43:279-287.
4. Bachevalier J, Mishkin M. 1989. Mnemonic and neuropathological effects of occluding the posterior cerebral artery in Macaca mulatta. Neuropsychologia 27:83-105.
5. Bachevalier J, Parkinson JK, Mishkin M. 1985. Visual recognition in monkeys: effects of separate vs. combined transection of fornix and amygdalofugal pathways. Exp Brain Res 57:554-561.
6. Baker KB, Kim JJ. 2002. Effects of stress and hippocampal NMDA receptor antagonism on recognition memory in rats. Learn Mem 9:58-65.
7. Broadbent NJ, Squire LR, Clark RE. 2004. Spatial memory, recognition memory, and the hippocampus. PNAS 101:14515-14520.
8. Clark RE, Zola SM, Squire LR. 2000. Impaired recognition memory in rats after damage to the hippocampus. J Neurosci 20:8853-8860.
9. Ennaceur A, Aggleton JP. 1997. The effects of neurotoxic lesions of the perirhinal cortex combined to fornix transection on object recognition memory in the rat. Behav Brain Res 88:181-193.
10. Ennaceur A, Neave, Aggleton JP. 1996. Neurotoxic lesions of the perirhinal cortex do not mimic the behavioural effects of fornix transection in the rat. Behav Brain Res 80:9-25.
11. Ennaceur A, Neave N, Aggleton JP. 1997. Spontaneous object recognition and object location memory in rats: the effects of lesions in the cingulate cortices, the medial prefrontal cortex, the cingulum bundle and the fornix. Exp Brain Res 113:509-519.
12. Ennaceur A, Delacour J. 1988. A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. I: behavioral data. Behav Brain Res 31:47-59.
13. Forwood SE, Winters BD, Bussey TJ. 2005. Hippocampal lesions that abolish spatial maze performance spare object recognition memory at delays of up to 48 hours. Hippocampus 15:347-355.
14. Gaffan D. 1974. Recognition impaired and association intact in the memory of monkeys after transection of the fornix. J Comp Physiol Psychol 86:1100-1109.
15. Gaffan D, Murray EA. 1992. Monkeys with rhinal cortex lesions succeed in object discrimination learning despite 24-hour intertrial intervals and fail at match to sample despite double sample presentations. Behav Neurosci 106:30-38.
16. Gaskin S, Tremblay A, Mumby DG. 2003. Anterograde and retrograde object-recognition memory in rats with hippocampal lesions. Hippocampus 13:962-969.
17. Gould TJ, Rowe WB, Heman KL, Mesches MH, Young DA, Rose GM, Bickford PC. 2002. Effects of hippocampal lesions on patterned motor learning in the rat. Brain Res Bull 58:581-586.
18. Mann JR, Squire LR. 1999. Impaired recognition memory on the Doors and People test after damage limited to the hippocampal region. Hippocampus 9:495-499.
19. Meunier M, Bachevalier J, Mishkin M, Murray EA. 1993. Effects on visual recognition of combined and separate ablations of the entorhinal and perirhinal cortex in rhesus monkeys. J Neurosci 13: 5418-5432.
20. Mumby DG. 2001. Perspectives on object-recognition memory following hippocampal damage: lessons from studies in rats. Behav Brain Res 127:159-182.
21. Mumby DG, Pinel JPJ. 1994. Rhinal cortex lesions and object recognition in rats. Behav Neurosci 108:11-18.
22. Mumby DG, Astur RS, Sutherland RJ, Weisend MP. 1999. Retrograde amnesia and selective damage to the hippocampal formation: memory for places and object discriminations. Behav Brain Res 106:97-107.
23. Mumby DG, Glenn MJ, Nesbitt CE, Kyriazis DA. 2002. Dissociation of object recognition and object discrimination in retrograde memory following lesions of perirhinal cortex in rats. Behav Brain Res 132:215-226.
24. Murray EA. 1996. What have ablation studies told us about the neural substrates of stimulus memory? Semin Neurosci 8:13-22.
25. Murray EA, Mishkin M. 1986. Visual recognition in monkeys following rhinal cortical ablations combined with either amygdalectomy or hippocampectomy. J Neurosci 6:1991-2003.
26. Nemanic S, Alvarado MC, Bachevalier J. 2004. The hippocampal parahippocampal regions and recognition memory: insights from visual paired comparison versus object-delayed nonmatching in monkeys. J Neurosci 24:2013-2026.
27. Vnek N, Rothblat LA. 1996. The hippocampus and long-term object memory in the rat. J Neurosci 16:2780-2787.
28. Warburton EC, Aggleton JP. 1999. Differential deficits in the Morris water maze following cytotoxic lesions of the anterior thalamus and fornix transection. Behav Brain Res 98:27-38.
29. Wiig KA, Bilkey DK. 1995. Lesions of rat perirhinal cortex exacerbate the memory deficit observed following damage to the fimbria-fornix. Behav Neurosci 109:620-630.
30. Winters BD, Forwood SE, Cowell RA, Saksida LM, Bussey TJ. 2004. Double dissociation between hippocampus and perirhinal cortex on tests of spatial and object recognition memory: heterogeneity of function within the medial temporal lobe. J Neurosci 24:5901-5908.
31. Zola-Morgan S, Squire LR. 1985. Medial temporal lesions in monkeys impair memory on a variety of tasks sensitive to human amnesia. Behav Neurosci 99:22-34.
32. Zola-Morgan S, Squire LR. 1986. Memory impairment in monkeys following lesions of the hippocampus. Behav Neurosci 100:165-170.
33. Zola-Morgan S, Squire LR, Amaral DG, Suzuki WA. 1989. Lesions of the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex that spare the amygdala and hippocampal formation produce severe memory impairment. J Neurosci 9:4355-4370.
34. Zola SM, Squire LR, Teng E, Stefanacci L, Buffalo EA, Clark RE. 2000. Impaired recognition memory in monkeys after damage limited to the hippocampal region. J Neurosci 20:451-463.