One-trial object recognition in rats and mice: Methodological and theoretical issues

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 215, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 244-254

  Ennaceur, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUNDERLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Episodic; Hippocampus; Humans; Memory; Mice; Novelty preference; Perirhinal cortex; Rats; Recency

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; EPISODIC MEMORY; HYPOTHESIS; MENTAL FUNCTION; MENTAL TASK; METHODOLOGY; MOUSE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NONHUMAN; ONE TRIAL OBJECT RECOGNITION TASK; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REVIEW; THEORY; VALIDITY; WORKING MEMORY;

ANIMALS; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MICE; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; RATS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 77954317073     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.12.036     Document Type: Review

References (151)

1. Aggleton J.P. One-trial object recognition by rat. Q J Exp Psychol 1985, 37B:279-294.
2. Aggleton J.P., Hunt P.R., Rawlins J.N. The effects of hippocampal lesions upon spatial and non-spatial tests of working memory. Behav Brain Res 1986, 19:133-146.
3. Albasser M.M., Davies M., Futter J.E., Aggleton J.P. Magnitude of the object recognition deficit associated with perirhinal cortex damage in rats: effects of varying the lesion extent and the duration of the sample period. Behav Neurosci 2009, 123:115-124.
4. Albasser M.A., Poirier G.L., Aggleton J.P. Qualitatively different modes of perirhinal-hippocampal engagement when rats explore novel vs. familiar objects as revealed by c-Fos imaging. Eur J Neurosci 2010, 31:134-147.
5. Allen P.A., Kaut K.P., Lord R.R. Emotion and episodic memory. Handbook of episodic memory 2008, vol. 18:115-132. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
6. Babb S.J., Crystal J.D. Discrimination of what, when, and where: implications for episodic-like memory in rats. Learn Motiv 2005, 36:177-189.
7. Babb S.J., Crystal J.D. Episodic-like memory in the rat. Curr Biol 2006, 16:1317-1321.
8. Bachevalier J. Ontogenetic development of habit and memory formation in primates. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1990, 608:457-474.
9. Baddeley A.D. Working memory. Science 1992, 255:556-559.
10. Baddeley A.D. The concept of working memory. Models of short-term memory 1996, 1-27. Psychology Press, Hove, England. S.E. Gathercole (Ed.).
11. Bahrick L., Pickens J. Infant memory for object motion across a period of three months: implications for a four-phase attention function. J Exp Child Psychol 1995, 59:343-371.
12. Bahrick L., Hernandez-Reif M., Pickens J. The effect of retrieval cues on visual preferences and memory in infancy: evidence for a four-phase attention function. J Exp Child Psychol 1997, 67:1-20.
13. Bahrick L., Gogate L., Ruiz I. Attention and memory for faces and actions in infancy: the salience of actions over faces in dynamic events. Child Dev 2002, 73:1629-1643.
14. Balota D.A., Coane J.H. Semantic memory. Learning and memory: a comprehensive reference 2008, 511-534. Elsevier, Amsterdam. J.H. Byrne, H. Eichenbaum, R. Mwenzel, H.L. Roediger, D. Sweatt (Eds.).
15. Banks M.S., Ginsburg A.R. Infant visual preferences: a review and new theoretical treatment. Adv Child Dev Behav 1985, 19:207-246.
16. Barbosa F.F., Pontes I.M.O., Ribeiro A.M., Silva R.H. Extending possible applications of an episodic-like memory task in rats. Behav Brain Res 2010, 215:326-331.
17. Barker G.R.I., Bird F., Alexander V., Warburton E.C. Recognition memory for objects, place, and temporal order: a disconnection analysis of the role of the medial prefrontal cortex and perirhinal cortex. J Neurosci 2007, 27:2948-2957.
18. Bäuml K-H, Pastötter B, Hanslmayr S. Binding and inhibition in episodic memory-cognitive, emotional, and neural processes. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.04.005.
19. Biederman I., Ju G. Surface versus edge-base determinants of visual recognition. Cogn Psychol 1988, 20:38-64.
20. Bornstein M.H., Sigman M.D. Continuity in mental development from infancy. Child Dev 1986, 57:251-274.
21. Bowmaker J.K. Evolution of vertebrates visual pigments. Vision Res 2008, 48:2022-2041.
22. Burnham D., Dodd B. Familiarity and novelty preferences in infants' auditory-visual speech perception: problems, factors, and a solution. Advances in infancy research 1999, vol. 12:170-187. Ablex, Stamford.
23. Carter-Dawson L.D., LaVail M.M. Rods and cones in the mouse retina. I. Structural analysis using light and electron microscopy. J Comp Neurol 1979, 188:245-262.
24. Cerella J. Absence of perspective processing in the pigeon. Pattern Recognit 1977, 9:66-68.
25. Cerella J. Mechanisms of concept formation in the pigeon. Analysis of visual behavior 1982, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. D.J. Ingle, M.A. Goodale, R.J.W. Mansfield (Eds.).
26. Cerella J. Shape constancy in the pigeon: the perspective transformations decomposed. Behavioral approaches to pattern recognition and concept formation (quantitative analyses of behavior, vol. 8). 1990, 145-163. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. M.L.E.T.-A. Commons (Ed.).
27. Chemero A., Heyser C. Object exploration and a problem with reductionism. Synthese 2005, 147:403-423.
28. Cohen L.B., Gelber E.R. Infant visual memory. Infant perception: from sensation to cognition: vol. 1. Basic visual processes 1975, 347-403. Academic, New York. L.B. Cohen, P. Salapatek (Eds.).
29. Cook R.G., Katz J.S. Dynamic object perception by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 1999, 25:194-210.
30. Courage M., Howe M. The ebb and flow of infant attentional preference: evidence for long-term recognition memory in 3-month olds. J Exp Child Psychol 1998, 70:26-53.
31. Courage M., Howe M. Long-term retention in 3.5-month-olds: familiarization time and individual differences in attentional style. J Exp Child Psychol 2001, 79:271-293.
32. Dean P. Are rats short-sighted? Effects of stimulus distance and size on visual detection. Q J Exp Psychol B 1981, 33:69-76.
33. Delius J.D. Categorical discrimination of objects and pictures by pigeons. Anim Learn Behav 1992, 20:301-311.
34. Dellu F., Mayo W., Cherkaoui J., Le Moal M., Simon H. A two-trial memory task with automated recording: study in young and aged rats. Brain Res 1992, 588:132-139.
35. Dere E., Huston J.P., De Souza Silva M.A. Episodic-like memory in mice: simultaneous assessment of object, place and temporal order memory. Brain Res Protoc 2005, 16:10-19.
36. Dere E., Huston J.P., De Souza Silva M.A. Integrated memory for objects, places, and temporal order: evidence for episodic-like memory in mice. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2005, 84:214-221.
37. Dere E., Kart-Teke E., Huston J.P., De Souza Silva M.A. The case for episodic memory in animals. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2006, 30:1206-1224.
38. Dere E., Huston J.P., De Souza Silva M.A. The pharmacology, neuroanatomy and neurogenetics of one-trial object recognition in rodents. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2007, 31:673-704.
39. Dere E., Zlomizica A., Viggiano D., Ruocco L.A., Watanabee T., Sadile A.G., et al. Episodic-like and procedural memory impairments in histamine H1 receptor knockout mice coincide with change in acetylcholine esterase activity in the hippocampus and dopamine turnover in the cerebellum. Neuroscience 2008, 157:532-541.
40. DeVito L.M., Eichenbaum H. Distinct contributions of the hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex to the " what-where-when" components of episodic-like memory in mice. Behav Brain Res 2010, 215:318-325.
41. Diamond A. Rate of maturation of the hippocampus and the developmental progression of children's performance on the delayed non-matching to sample and visual paired comparison tasks. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1990, 608:394-426.
42. DiCarlo J.J., Cox D.D. Untangling invariant object recognition. Trends Cogn Sci 2007, 11:333-341.
43. Dix S.L., Aggleton J.P. Extending the spontaneous preference test of recognition: evidence of object-location and object-context recognition. Behav Brain Res 1999, 99:191-200.
44. Dunnett S.B. Comparative effects of cholinergic drugs and lesions of nucleus basalis or fimbria-fornix on delayed matching in rats. Psychopharmacology 1985, 87:357-363.
45. Eacott M.J., Easton A., Zinkivskay A. Recollection in an episodic-like memory task in the rat. Learn Mem 2005, 12:221-223.
46. Easton A., Eacott M.J. A new working definition of episodic memory: replacing 'when' with 'which'. Handbook of episodic memory 2008, vol. 18:185-196. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
47. Easton A., Eacott M.J. Recollection of episodic memory within the medial temporal lobe: Behavioural dissociations from other types of memory. Behav Brain Res 2010, 215:310-317.
48. Ennaceur A., Delacour J. Effect of combined or separate administration of piracetarn and choline on learning and memory in the rat. Psychopharmacology 1987, 92:58-67.
49. Ennaceur A., Delacour J. A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. I. Behavioral data. Behav Brain Res 1988, 31:47-59.
50. Ennaceur A., Meliani K. A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. III. Spatial vs. non spatial working memory. Behav Brain Res 1992, 51:83-92.
51. Ennaceur A., Aggleton J.P. Spontaneous recognition of object configurations in rats: effects of fornix lesions. Exp Brain Res 1994, 100:85-92.
52. Ennaceur A., Neave N., Aggleton J.P. Neurotoxic lesions of the perirhinal cortex do not mimic the behavioural effects of fornix transection in the rat. Behav Brain Res 1996, 80:9-25.
53. Ennaceur A., Aggleton J.P. The effects of neurotoxic lesions of the perirhinal cortex combined to fornix transection on object recognition memory in the rat. Behav Brain Res 1997, 88:181-193.
54. Ennaceur A., Neave N., Aggleton J.P. Spontaneous object recognition and object location memory in rats: the effects of lesions in the cingulate cortices, the medial prefrontal cortex, the cingulum bundle and the fornix. Exp Brain Res 1997, 113:509-519.
55. Ennaceur A., Aggleton J.P., Fray P.J. Delayed non-matching to sample in a novel automated visual memory apparatus using mixed retention intervals. Neurosci Res Commun 1997, 20:103-111.
56. Ennaceur A., Aggleton J.P. Analysis of the automated delayed nonmatching-to-position task: the effects of changing contiguity between stimulus, response and reinforcement, and of providing a salient spatial cue within the apparatus. Neurosci Res Commun 1998, 22:21-29.
57. Ennaceur A., Aggleton J.P. An attempt to overcome the problem of motor mediation by rats in the delayed non-matching-to-position task. Neurosci Res Commun 1998, 22:153-163.
58. Ennaceur Michalikova S., Bradford A., Ahmed S. Detailed analysis of the behavior of Lister and Wistar rats in anxiety, object recognition and object location tasks. Behav Brain Res 2005, 159:247-266.
59. Ennaceur A., Michalikova S., Chazot P.L. Do rats really express neophobia towards novel objects? Experimental evidence from exposure to novelty and to an object recognition task in an open space and an enclosed space. Behav Brain Res 2009, 197:417-434.
60. Fantz R.L. A method for studying early visual development. Percept Mot Skills 1956, 6:13-15.
61. Fantz R.L. Pattern vision in young infants. Psychol Rec 1958, 8:43-47.
62. Fantz R.L. Visual discrimination in a neonate chimpanzee. Percept Mot Skills 1958, 8:59-66.
63. Fantz R.L., Ordy J.M. A visual acuity test for infants under six months of age. Psychol Rec 1959, 9:159-164.
64. Fantz R.L. Visual experience in infants: decreased attention to familiar patterns relative to novel ones. Science 1964, 146:668-670.
65. Fantz R.L. Visual perception and experience in infancy: issues and approaches. Early experience and visual information processing in perceptual and reading disorders 1970, 351-380. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC. D. Lindsley, F. Young (Eds.).
66. Fagan J.F. Memory in the infant. J Exp Child Psychol 1970, 9:217-226.
67. Gallistel C.R. The organization of learning 1990, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
68. Gibson B.M., Wilks T.J., Kelly D.M. Rats (Rattus norvegicus) encode the shape of an array of discrete objects. J Comp Psychol 2007, 121:130-144.
69. Gibson E.J., Walker A.S. Development of knowledge of visual-tactual affordances of substance. Child Dev 1984, 55:453-460.
70. Gilbert P.E., Kesner R.P. Recognition memory for complex visual discriminations is influenced by stimulus interference in rodents with perirhinal cortex damage. Learn Mem 2003, 10:525-530.
71. Gottfried A., Rose S.A., Bridger W.H. Effects of visual, haptic, and manipulatory experiences on infants' visual recognition memory of objects. Dev Psychol 1978, 14:305-312.
72. Graham K.S., Simons J.S., Pratt K.H., Patterson K., Hodges J.R. Insights from semantic dementia on the relationship between episodic and semantic memory. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38:313-324.
73. Hampton R.R., Hampstead B.M., Murray E.A. Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) demonstrate robust memory for what and where, but not when, in an open-Weld test of memory. Learn Motiv 2005, 36:245-259.
74. Hannesson D.K., Howland J.G., Phillips A.G. Interaction between perirhinal and medial prefrontal cortex is required for temporal order but not recognition memory for objects in rats. J Neurosci 2004, 24:4596-4604.
75. Hannesson D.K., Vacca G., Howland J.G., Phillips A.G. Medial prefrontal cortex is involved in spatial temporal order memory but not spatial recognition memory in tests relying on spontaneous exploration in rats. Behav Brain Res 2004, 153:273-285.
76. Hayward W.G., Williams P. Viewpoint dependence and object discriminability. Psychol Sci 2000, 11:7-12.
77. Healey A.N., Gaffan E.A. Configural learning without configural training. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2001, 27:373-393.
78. Hoffman M.L., Beran M.J., Washburn D.A. Memory for " what" , " where" , and " when" information in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2009, 35:143-152.
79. Hotte M., Naudon L., Jay T.M. Modulation of recognition and temporal order memory retrieval by dopamine D1 receptor in rats. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2005, 84:85-92.
80. Houston-Price C., Nakai S. Distinguishing novelty and familiarity effects in infant preference procedures. Infant Child Dev 2004, 13:341-348.
81. Humphrey G.K., Khan S.C. Recognizing novel views of three-dimensional objects. Can J Psychol 1992, 46:170-190.
82. Hunter M.A., Ross H.S., Ames E.W. Preferences for familiar or novel toys: effects of familiarization time in 1-year-olds. Dev Psychol 1982, 18:519-529.
83. Hunter M.A., Ames E. A multifactor model of infant preferences for novel and familiar stimuli. Advances in infancy research 1988, vol. 5:69-95. Ablex, Stamford.
84. Jacobs G.H. The distribution and nature of colour vision among the mammals. Biol Rev 1993, 68:413-471.
85. Jacobs G.H., Fenwick J.A., Williams G.A. Cone-based vision of rats for ultraviolet and visible lights. J Exp Biol 2001, 204:2439-2446.
86. Jeffery K.J. Do discrimination tasks discourage multi-dimensional stimulus processing? Evidence from a cross-modal object discrimination in rats. Behav Brain Res 2007, 183:213-221.
87. Jeon C.-J., Enrica Strettoi E., Masland R.H. The major cell populations of the mouse retina. J Neurosci 1998, 18:8936-8946.
88. Kart-Teke E., De Souza Silva M.A., Huston J.P., Dere E. Wistar rats show episodic-like memory for unique experiences. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2006, 85:173-182.
89. Kennedy Q., Mather M., Carstensen L.L. The role of motivation in the age-related positivity effect in autobiographical memory. Psychol Sci 2004, 15:208-214.
90. Kensinger E.A. Remembering the details: effects of emotion. Emotion Rev 2009, 1:99-113.
91. Kirchhoff B.A. Individual differences in episodic memory: the role of self-initiated encoding strategies. Neuroscientist 2009, 15:166-179.
92. Kirkpatrick-Steger K., Wasserman E.A., Biederman I. Effects of spatial rearrangement of object components on picture recognition in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav 1996, 65:465-475.
93. Kirkpatrick-Steger K., Wasserman E.A. The what and the where of the pigeon's processing of complex visual stimuli. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 1996, 22:60-67.
94. Kirkpatrick-Steger K., Wasserman E.A., Biederman I. Effects of deletion, scrambling, and movement on picture recognition in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 1998, 24:34-46.
95. Kirkpatrick-Steger K., Wasserman E.A., Biederman I. The pigeon's discrimination of shape and location information. Vis Cogn 2000, 7:417-436.
96. Knowlton B., McGowan M., Olton D.S. Hippocampal stimulation disrupts spatial working memory even 8h after acquisition. Behav Neural Biol 1985, 44:325-337.
97. LaBar K.S., Cabeza R. Cognitive neuroscience of emotional memory. Nat Rev Neurosci 2006, 7:54-64.
98. Liao H.-I., Park J., Shimojo E., Ishizaki J., Yeh S.-L., Shimojo S. Gaze orienting, and novelty vs. familiarity preference. J Vis 2009, 9:375.
99. Mather M. Emotional arousal and memory binding-an object-based framework. Perspect Psychol Sci 2007, 2:33-52.
100. McCloskey M., Santee J. Are semantic memory and episodic memory distinct systems?. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn Mem 1981, 7:66-71.
101. McKee R.D., Squire L.R. On the development of declarative memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1993, 19:397-404.
102. Menon V., Boyett-Anderson J.M., Schatzberg A.F., Reiss A.L. Relating semantic and episodic memory systems. Cogn Brain Res 2002, 13:261-265.
103. Mitchell J.B., Laiacona J. The medial frontal cortex and temporal memory: tests using spontaneous exploratory behaviour in the rat. Behav Brain Res 1998, 97:107-113.
104. Mumby D.G., Pinel J.P.J., Wood E.R. Nonrecurring-items delayed nonmatching-to-sample in rats: a new paradigm for testing non-spatial working memory. Psychobiology 1990, 18:321-326.
105. Mumby D.G., Pinel J.P.J. Rhinal cortex lesions and object recognition in rats. Behav Neurosci 1994, 108:11-18.
106. Mumby D.G. Perspectives on object-recognition memory following hippocampal damage: lessons from studies in rats. Behav Brain Res 2001, 127:159-181.
107. Mumby D.G., Glenn M.J., Nesbitt C., Kyriazis D.A. Dissociation in retrograde memory for object discriminations and object recognition in rats with perirhinal cortex damage. Behav Brain Res 2002, 132:215-226.
108. Mumby D.G., Gaskin S., Glenn M.J., Schramek T.E., Lehmann H. Hippocampal damage and exploratory preferences in rats: memory for objects, places, and contexts. Learn Mem 2002, 9:49-57.
109. Mumby D.G., Piterkin P., Lecluse V., Lehmann H. Perirhinal cortex damage and anterograde object-recognition in rats after long retention intervals. Behav Brain Res 2007, 185:82-87.
110. Murray E.A., Bussey T.J. Perceptual-mnemonic functions of the perirhinal cortex. Trends Cogn Sci 1999, 3:142-151.
111. Naqshbandi M., Feeney M.C., McKenzie T.L.B., Roberts W.A. Testing for episodic-like memory in rats in the absence of time of day cues: replication of Babb and Crystal. Behav Process 2007, 74:217-225.
112. Norman G., Eacott M.J. Impaired object recognition with increasing levels of feature ambiguity in rats with perirhinal cortex lesions. Behav Brain Res 2004, 148:79-91.
113. Olton D.S., Becker J.T., Handelmann J.E. Hippocampus, space and memory. Behav Brain Sci 1979, 2:313-365.
114. Olton D.S., Markowska A.L., Pang K., Golski S., Voytko M.L., Gorman L.K. Comparative cognition and assessment of cognitive processes in animals. Behav Pharmacol 1992, 3:307-318.
115. Pascalis O., de Haan M. Recognition memory and novelty preference: what model?. Progress in infancy research 2003, vol. 3:95-119. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah.
116. Peissig J.J., Wasserman E.A., Young M.E., Biederman I. Learning an object from multiple views enhances its recognition in an orthogonal rotational axis in pigeons. Vision Res 2002, 42:2051-2062.
117. Peissig J.J., Young M.E., Wasserman E.A., Biederman I. The role of edges in object recognition by pigeons. Perception 2005, 34:1353-1374.
118. Prickaerts J., Steinbusch H.W.M., Smits J.F.M., De Vente J. Possible role of nitric oxide-cyclic GMP pathway in object recognition memory: effects of 7-nitroindazole and zaprinast. Eur J Pharmacol 1997, 337:125-136.
119. Prusky G.T., Douglas R.M., Nelson L., Shabanpoor A., Sutherland R.J. Visual memory task for rats reveals an essential role for hippocampus and perirhinal cortex. PNAS 2004, 101:5064-5068.
120. Prusky G.T., West P.W.R., Douglas R.M. Behavioral assessment of visual acuity in mice and rats. Vision Res 2000, 40:2201-2209.
121. Richmond J., Colombo M., Hayne H. Interpreting visual preferences in the visual paired-comparison task. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2007, 33:823-831.
122. Riesenhuber M., Poggio T. Models of object recognition. Nat Neurosci 2000, 3:1199-1204.
123. Roberts W.A., Feeney M.C., Macpherson K., Petter M., McMillan N., Musolino E. Episodic-like memory in rats: is it based on when or how long ago?. Science 2008, 320:113-115.
124. Roder B., Bushnell E., Sasseville A.-M. Infants' preferences for familiarity and novelty during the course of visual processing. Infancy 2000, 1:491-508.
125. Rose S.A., Gottfried A.W., Melloy-Carminar P., Bridger W.H. Familiarity and novelty preferences in infant recognition memory: implications for information processing. Dev Psychol 1982, 18:704-713.
126. Rose S.A., Feldman J.F., Jankowski J.J. Infant visual recognition memory. Dev Rev 2004, 24:74-100.
127. Rothblat L.A., Hayes L.L. Short-term object-recognition memory in the rat: non-matching with trial unique junk stimuli. Behav Neurosci 1987, 101:587-590.
128. Sanocki T., Bowyer K.W., Heath M.D., Sarkar S. Are edges sufficient for object recognition?. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1998, 24:340-349.
129. Schmolck H., Buffalo E.A., Squire L.R. Memory distortions develop over time: recollections of the O.J. Simpson trial verdict after 15 and 32 months. Psychol Sci 2000, 11:39-45.
130. Schott B.H., Düzel E. The multiple roles of dopaminergic neurotransmission in episodic memory. Handbook of episodic memory 2008, vol. 18:379-396. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
131. Schwartz B.L., Evans S. Episodic memory in primates. Am J Primatol 2001, 55:71-85.
132. Shastri L. Episodic memory and cortico-hippocampal interactions. Trends Cogn Sci 2002, 6:162-168.
133. Sheldon A.B. Preference for familiar versus novel stimuli as a function of the familiarity of the environment. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1969, 67:516-521.
134. Shimojo E., Park J., Kashino M., Shimojo S. Familiarity for faces and novelty for natural scenes in preference: does similarity matter?. J Vis 2008, 8:1137.
135. Skov-Rackette S.I., Miller N.Y., Shettleworth S.J. What-where-when memory in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2006, 32:345-358.
136. Sokolov Y.N. Perception and the conditioned reflex [Waydenfeld SW, Trans.] 1963, Macmillan, New York.
137. Spence M. Young infants' long-term auditory memory: evidence for changes in preferences as a function of delay. Dev Psychobiol 1996, 29:685-695.
138. Squire L.R., Stuart M.Z. Episodic memory, semantic memory, and amnesia. Hippocampus 1998, 8:205-211.
139. Stark C.E.L., Squire L.R. Intact visual perceptual discrimination in humans in the absence of perirhinal cortex. Learn Mem 2000, 7:273-278.
140. Szpunar K.K., McDermott K.B. Episodic memory: an evolving concept. Learning and memory: a comprehensive reference 2008, 491-509. Elsevier, Oxford. D. Sweat, R. Menzel, H. Eichenbaum, H.L. Roediger (Eds.).
141. Tarr M.J., Bülthoff H.H. Object recognition in man, monkey, and machine 1999, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
142. Tulving E. Neurocognitive processes of human memory. Basic mechanisms in cognition and language 1998, 261-281. Elsevier. C. von Euler, I. Lundberg, R. Llinás (Eds.).
143. Ungerleider L.G., Courtney S.M., Haxby J.V. A neural system for human visual working memory. PNAS 1998, 95:883-890.
144. Vaughan W., Greene S.L. Pigeon visual memory capacity. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 1984, 10:256-271.
145. Wagner S.H., Sakovits L.J. A process analysis of infant visual and cross-modal recognition memory: implications for an amodal code. Advances in infancy research 1986, vol. 4:195-217. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
146. Wallis G., Bülthoff H. Learning to recognize objects. Trends Cogn Sci 1999, 3:22-31.
147. Wiig K.A., Bilkey D.K. Lesions of rat perirhinal cortex exacerbate the memory deficit observed following damage to the fimbria-fornix. Behav Neurosci 1995, 109:620-630.
148. Winters B.D., Saksida L.M., Bussey T.J. Object recognition memory: neurobiological mechanisms of encoding, consolidation and retrieval. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2008, 32:1055-1070.
149. Winters BD, Bartko SJ, Saksida LM, Bussey TJ. Muscimol, AP5, or scopolamine infused into perirhinal cortex impairs two-choice visual discrimination learning in rats. Neurobiol Learn Mem; doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2009.10.002. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2009.10.002.
150. Wittmann B.C., Schiltz K., Boehler C.N., Düzel E. Mesolimbic interaction of emotional valence and reward improves memory formation. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:1000-1008.
151. Zeaman D., Hanley P. Stimulus preferences as structural features. Perception, cognition, and development 1983, 103-128. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. T.J. Tighe, B.E. Shepp (Eds.).