Methods, techniques, and tools for the on-line study of the writing process

Writing: Processes, Tools and Techniques

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-18

  Olive, Thierry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878583256     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Alamargot, D., Dansac, C., Chesnet, D. & Fayol, M. (2007). Parallel processing before and after pauses: A combined analysis of graphomotor and eye movements during procedural text production. In: M. Torrance, L. van Waes & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Writing and Cognition: Research and Applications (13-29). Amsterdam. Elsevier.
2. Alamargot, D., Chesnet, D., Dansac, C. & Ros, C. (2006). Eye and Pen: A new device for studying reading during writing. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 38, 287-299.
3. Alves, R. A., Castro, S. L. & Olive, T. (2008). Execution and pauses in writing narratives: Processing time, cognitive effort and typing skill. International Journal of Psychology, 43, 969-979.
4. Alves, R. A., Castro, S. L., Sousa, L. & Strömqvist, S. (2007). Typing skill and pauseexecution cycles in written composition. In: M. Torrance, L. van Waes, & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Writing and cognition: Research and applications (55-66). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
5. Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417-423.
6. Berninger, V. W. & Swanson, H. L. (1994). Modifying Hayes and Flower’s model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. In: E. C. Butterfield (Vol. Ed.), Advances in cognition and educational practice, Vol. 2. Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing (57-81). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
7. Bourdin, B. & Fayol, M. (1994). Is written language production more difficult than oral language production? A working memory approach. International Journal of Psychology, 29, 591-620.
8. Bourdin, B. & Fayol, M. (2002). Even in adults, written production is still more costly than oral production. International Journal of Psychology, 37, 219-227.
9. Breetvelt, I., van den Bergh, H. & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1994). Relation between writing processes and text quality: when and how. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 103-123.
10. Brown, T. L. & Carr, T. H. (1989). Automaticity in skill acquisition: mechanisms for reducing interference in concurrent performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 45-59.
11. Caplan, D. & Waters, G. S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 77-126.
12. Chanquoy, L., Foulin, J. N. & Fayol, M. (1990). Temporal management of short text writing by children and adults. European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 10, 513-540.
13. Chenoweth, N. A. & Hayes, J. R. (2003). The inner voice in writing. Written Communication, 23, 135-149.
14. Cowan, N. (2005). Working Memory Capacity. New York: Psychology Press.
15. Ericsson, K. A. & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
16. Fayol, M. (1999). From on-line management problems to strategies in written production. In: M. Torrance & G. Jeffery (Eds.), Cognitive demands of writing. Processing capacity and working memory effects in text production (13-24). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
17. Foulin, J. M. (1995). Pauses et débits: les indicateurs temporels de la production écrite. L’Année Psychologique, 95, 483-504.
18. Foulin, J. N. (1998). To what extent does pause location predicts pause duration in adults and children writing. CPC/Current Psychology of Cognition, 17, 601-620.
19. Flower, L. S. & Hayes, J. R. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (31-49). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Friedlander, E. C. (1989). The writer stumbles: some constraints on composing in English as a second language. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 11A.
21. Galbraith, D. (1999). Writing as a knowledge-constituting process. In: M. Torrance & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Knowing What to Write: Conceptual Processes in Text Production (139-160). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
22. Gathercole, S. E. & Baddeley, A. (1993). Working memory and language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Hayes, J. R. & Chenoweth, N. A. (2003). The inner voice in writing. Written Communication, 23, 135-149.
24. Hayes, J. R. & Chenoweth, N. A. (2006). Is working memory involved in the transcribing and editing of texts? Written Communication, 20, 99-118.
25. Hayes, J. R. & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In: L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (3-30) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Janssen, D., van Waes, L. & van den Bergh H. (1996). Effects of thinking aloud on writing processes. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (233-250). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Just, M. A. & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
28. Kaufer, D. S., Hayes, J. R. & Flower, L. S. (1986). Composing written sentences. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 121-140.
29. Kellogg, R. T. (1987). Effects of topic knowledge on the allocation of processing time and cognitive effort to writing processes. Memory & Cognition, 15, 256-266.
30. Kellogg, R. T. (1994). The psychology of writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In: C. M. Levy & S. E. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing (57-71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Kellogg, R. T., Olive, T. & Piolat A. (2007). Verbal, visual and spatial working memory in written language production. Acta Psychologica, 124, 382-397.
33. Leijten, M. & van Waes, L. (2006). Inputlog: New perspectives on the logging of on-line writing. In: K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer keystroke logging and writing: Methods and applications (73-94). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
34. Levy, C. M. & Ransdell, S. E. (1994). Computer-aided protocol analysis of writing processes. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 26, 219-223.
35. Levy, C. M. & Ransdell, S. E. (1995). Is writing as difficult as it seems? Memory and Cognition, 23, 767-779.
36. Levy, C. M. & Ransdell, S. (2002). Writing with concurrent memory loads. In: T. Olive & C. M. Levy (Eds.), Contemporary tools and techniques for studying writing (9-30). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
37. McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 299-325.
38. McCutchen, D. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist, 35, 13-23.
39. Olive, T. (2004). Working memory in writing: Empirical evidence from the dual-task technique. European Psychologist, 9, 32-42.
40. Olive, T., Alves, R. A. & Castro, S. L. (2009). Cognitive processes in writing during pauses and execution periods. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 758-785.
41. Olive, T. & Kellogg, R. T. (2002). Concurrent activation of high- and low-level production processes in written composition. Memory and Cognition, 30, 594-600.
42. Olive, T., Kellogg R. T. & Piolat, A. (2002). The triple-task technique for studying the process of writing. In: T. Olive & C. M. Levy (Eds.), Contemporary tools and techniques for studying writing (31-58). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
43. Olive, T., Kellogg, R. T. & Piolat, A. (2008). Verbal, visual and spatial working memory demands during text composition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 669-687.
44. Passerault, J. M. (1991). L’analyse en temps réel de l’activité de résumé: une étude des temps de pause. In: M. Charolles & A. Petitjean (Eds.), Le résumé de texte. Aspects linguistiques, sémiotiques, psycholinguistiques et automatiques (207-219). Paris: Klincksieck.
45. Perrin, D. (2001). Progression analysis (PA): Investigating writing strategies in the workplace. In: T. Olive & C. M. Levy (Eds.), Contemporary Tools and Techniques for Studying Writing (105-117). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
46. Piolat, A., Kellogg, R.T. & Farioli, F. (2001). The triple task technique for studying writing processes: On which task is attention focused? Current Psychology Letters. Brain, Behavior and Cognition, 4, 67-83
47. Piolat, A. & Olive, T. (2000). Comment étudier le coût et le déroulement de la rédaction de textes? La méthode de triple-tâche: un bilan méthodologique. L’Année Psychologique, 100, 465-502.
48. Piolat, A., Olive, T., Roussey, J. Y., Thunin, O. & Ziegler, J. C. (1999). ScriptKell: a computer assisted tool for measuring the distribution of time and cognitive effort in writing and other complex cognitive activities. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 113-121.
49. Piolat, A., Roussey, J. Y., Olive, T. & Farioli, F. (1996). Charge mentale et mobilisation des processus rédactionnels: examen de la procédure de Kellogg. Psychologie française, 41, 339-354.
50. Power, M. J. (1986). A technique for measuring processing load during speech production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 367-385.
51. Ransdell, S. (1995). Generating thinking aloud protocols: Impact on the narrative writing of college students. American Journal of psychology, 108, 89-98.
52. Roussey, J. Y. & Piolat, A. (2008). Critical reading effort during text revision. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 765, 792.
53. Schilperoord, J. (2002). On the cognitive status of pauses in discourse production. In: T. Olive & C. M. Levy (Eds.), Contemporary tools and techniques for studying writing (59-85). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
54. Severinson Eklundh, K. & Kollberg, P. (1996). A computer tool and framework for analyzing on-line revisions. In: C. M. Levy & S. E. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing. Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (163-188). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55. Simpson, S. & Torrance, M. (2007). EyeWrite (Version 5.1). Nottingham, UK: Nottingham Trent University.
56. Strömqvist, S. & Ahlsén, E. (Eds.). (1999). The process of writing: A progress report. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, 83. Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Göteborg, Department of Linguistics.
57. Strömqvist, S. & Malmsten, L. (1998). ScriptLog Pro 1.04: User’s manual (Tech. rep.).Göteborg: University of Göteborg, Department of Linguistics.
58. Torrance, M. & Galbraith, D. (2006). The processing demands of writing. In: C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (67-82). New York: Guilford Publications.
59. Wengelin, A. (2007). The word-level focus in text production by adults with reading and writing difficulties. In: M. Torrance, L. van Waes, & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Writing and cognition: Research and applications (67-82). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
60. Wengelin, A., Torrance, M., Holmqvist, K., Simpson, S., Galbraith, D., Johansson, V. & Johansson, R. (2009). Combined eye tracking and keystroke-logging methods for studying cognitive processes in text production. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 337-351.