Intentions of hospital nurses to work with computers: Based on the theory of planned behavior

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 106-116

  Shoham, Snunith ^a   Gonen, Ayala ^b  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b TEL AVIV SOURASKY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Attitudes toward computers; Intention; Nurses; Self efficacy; Theory of planned behavior (TPB)

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COMPUTER; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; ISRAEL; NURSING STAFF; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BEHAVIOR; COMPUTERS; ISRAEL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL;

EID: 42949140532     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.NCN.0000304777.48155.e3     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Dowling AF. Do hospital staff interfere with computer system implementation? Health Care Manage Rev. 1980; 5: 23-32.
2. Grann, RE Attitudes and effective use of computers among hospital personnel. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. 1984; 8: 543-547.
3. Eaton N. Computer use in a school of nursing. Nurs Stand. 1990; 7:35-37.
4. Shumway JM, Jacknowitz AI, Abate MA. Analysis of physicians', pharmacists', and nurses' attitudes toward the use of computers to access drug information. Methods Inf Med. 1990; 20: 99-103.
5. Burkes M. Identifying and relating nurses' attitudes toward computer use. Comput Nurs. 1991; 9: 190-201.
6. Bradley MK. A Study to Determine the Attitudes of Practicing Registered Nurses Toward the Use of Computers in Providing Nursing Care in the Hospital Setting [dissertation]. Auburn, AL: Auburn University; 1993.
7. Adaskin EJ, Hughes L, McMullan P, McLean M, McMorris D. The impact of computerization on nursing: an interview study of users and facilitators. Comput Nurs. 1994; 12: 141-148.
8. Hugh L, Adaskin E, Dreidger M, et al. Impact of computerization on nursing: automated order entry, care planning, and implication for recruitment. Can J Nurs Adm. 1993; 6: 8-14.
9. Cooper CD. Gender Differences in Nurse Teachers' Attitudes to Information Technology [thesis]. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Nursing; 1999.
10. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA. Addison-Wesley; 1975.
11. Brown KM. Theory of reasoned action/theory of planned behavior. http://hsc.usf.edu/~kmbrown/TRA__TPB.htm. Accessed August 10, 2005.
12. Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991; 50: 179-211.
13. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977; 84: 191-215.
14. Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agencv. Am Psychol. 1982; 37: 122-147.
15. Agarwal R, Prasad J. The antecedents and consequences of user perceptions in information technology adoption. Decision Support Systems. 1998; 22: 15-29.
16. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer; 1984.
17. Mobley WH, Griffeth RW, Hand HH, Meglino BM. Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychol Bull. 1979; 86: 493-522.
18. Michaels CE, Spector PE. Causes of employee turnover: a test of the Mobley, Griffeth and Meglino model. J Appl Psychol. 1982; 67: 53-59.
19. Lum L, Kervin J, Clark K, Reid F, Sirola W. Explaining nursing turnover intent: job satisfaction, pay satisfaction, or organizational commitment? journal of Organizational Behavior. 1998; 19: 305-320.
20. Blegen MA. Nurses' job satisfaction: a meta-analysis of related variables. Nurs Res. 1993: 42: 36-40.
21. Rosenberg M, Reznikoff M, Strobel C, Ericson PR. Attitudes of nursing students toward computers. Nurs Outlook. 1967; 15: 44-46.
22. Startsman TS, Robinson RE. The attitude of medical and paramedical personnel toward computers. Comput Biomed Res. 1972; 5: 218-227.
23. Stone V. Attitudes of nurses towards computer usage and how computer use influences these attitudes. In: Hovenga EJS, McCormick KA, Ronald JS, eds. Nursing Informatics '91. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1991: 777-779.
24. Jaques ED. The Impact of Selected factors in Nurses' Attitudes Toward Bedside Computers [dissertation]. Miami, FL: Florida International University; 2002.
25. Stronge JH, Brodt A. Assessment of nurses' attitudes toward computerization. Comput Nurs. 1985; 3: 154-158.
26. Lerman M. Development of Infants Born to Diabetic Mothers [dissertation]. Ramat-Gan, Israel; Bar Ilan University, Department of Psychology; 1997.
27. Brodt A, Stronge JH. Nurses' attitudes toward computerization in a Midwestern community hospital Comput Nurs. 1986; 4: 82-86.
28. McBride SH, Nagle LM. Attitudes toward computers. a test of construct validity. Comput Nurs. 1996; 14: 164-170.
29. Tan KK. Computer Attitudes of Nurses in Singapore Hospital [thesis]. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University, National Institute of Education; 1999.
30. Wood SK. A Study of Nursing Attitudes Towards Computers in Two Rural Community Hospitals [thesis]. Louisville, KY: Bellarmine College; 2000.
31. Melhorn M, Legler WK, Clark GM. Current attitudes of medical personnel toward computers. Comput Biomed Res. 1979; 12: 327-334.
32. Krampf S, Robinson S. Managing nurses' attitudes toward computers. Nurs Manage. 1984;15: 29-34.
33. Jordan-Marsh M, Chang BL. Assessing readiness for interaction with computers in medical centers. Comput Nurs. 1985; 3: 266-271.
34. Palmer B. A smarter way of nursing? Nurs Times. 1990; 86: 64-66.
35. Skinner N, Brewer N. The dynamics of threat and challenge appraisals prior to stressful achievement events. Journal of Personal Sociology Psychology. 2002; 83: 678-692.
36. Sandler IN, Kim-Bae LS, MacKinnon D. Coping and negative appraisal as mediators between control beliefs and psychological symptoms in children of divorce.J Clin Child Psychol. 2000; 29: 336-347.
37. Burns KR, Egen EC. Description of a stressful encounter: appraisal, threat, and challenge.J Nurs Educ. 1994; 33: 21-28.
38. Vinokur-Kaplan D. To have - or not to have - another child: family planning attitudes, intention, and behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1978; 8: 29-46.