Comparative evaluation of numerical model and artificial neural network for simulating groundwater flow in Kathajodi-Surua Inter-basin of Odisha, India

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 495, Issue , 2013, Pages 38-51

  Mohanty, S ^a   Jha, Madan K ^b   Kumar, Ashwani ^a   Panda, D K ^a  

^a ICAR INDIAN INSTITUTE OF WATER MANAGEMENT   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network; Deltaic aquifer system; Groundwater flow modeling; Kathajodi Surua Inter basin; MODFLOW

Indexed keywords

ALLUVIAL AQUIFER SYSTEMS; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK MODELS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DELTAIC AQUIFER SYSTEMS; GROUNDWATER FLOW MODELING; KATHAJODI-SURUA INTER-BASIN; MODFLOW; ROOT MEAN SQUARED ERRORS;

AQUIFERS; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GROUNDWATER FLOW; NEURAL NETWORKS; NUMERICAL MODELS; RAIN; WATER LEVELS;

GROUNDWATER RESOURCES;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CALIBRATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVAPORATION; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; FLOW MODELING; GROUNDWATER FLOW; MODEL VALIDATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; WATER LEVEL; WELL WATER;

INDIA; KATHAJODI BASIN; ODISHA; SURUA BASIN;

EID: 84878372332     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.041     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adamowski J., Chan H.F. A wavelet neural network conjunction model for groundwater level forecasting. J. Hydrol. 2011, 407:28-40.
2. Alley W.M., Leake S.A. The journey from safe yield to sustainability. Ground Water 2004, 42(1):12-16.
3. Al-Salamah I.S., Ghazaw Y.M., Ghumman A.R. Groundwater modeling of Saq Aquifer Buraydah Al Qassim for better water management strategies. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2011, 173(1-4):851-860.
4. Anderson M.P., Woessner W.W. Applied Groundwater Modeling: Simulation of Flow and Advective Transport 1992, Academic Press, California.
5. ASCE Artificial neural networks in hydrology - I: Preliminary concepts. J. Hydrol. Eng. ASCE 2000, 5(2):115-123.
6. Banerjee P., Singh V.S., Chattopadhyay K., Chandra P.C., Singh B. Artificial neural network model as a potential alternative for groundwater salinity forecasting. J. Hydrol. 2011, 398:212-220.
7. Bear J., Cheng A.H.D. Modeling Groundwater Flow and Contaminant Transport 2010, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 834 pp.
8. Bouwer H. Integrated water management: emerging issues and challenges. Agric. Water Manag. 2000, 45:217-228.
9. CGWB, 1997. Ground Water Resource Estimation Methodology - 1997. Report of the Ground Water Resource Estimation Committee, Central Ground Water Board (CGWB), Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, New Delhi, India, 107 pp.
10. CGWB, 2006. Dynamic Groundwater Resources of India (as on March, 2004). Central Ground Water Board (CGWB), Ministry of Water Resources, New Delhi, India.
11. Coppola E., Szidarovszky F., Poulton M., Charles E. Artificial neural network approach for predicting transient water levels in a multilayered groundwater system under variable state, pumping, and climate conditions. J. Hydrol. Eng. ASCE 2003, 8(6):348-360.
12. Coppola E.A., Rana A.J., Poulton M.M., Szidarovszky F., Uhl V.W. A neural network approach for predicting aquifer water level elevations. Ground Water 2005, 43(2):231-241.
13. Coulibaly P., Anctil F., Aravena R., Bobee B. Artificial neural network modeling of water table depth fluctuations. Water Resour. Res. 2001, 37(4):885-896.
14. Daliakopoulos I.N., Coulibaly P., Tsanis I.K. Groundwater level forecasting using artificial neural network. J. Hydrol. 2005, 309:229-240.
15. Evans R.G., Sadler E.J.( Methods and technologies to improve efficiency of water use. Water Resour. Res. 2008, 44:W00E04. 10.1029/2007WR006200.
16. Gaur S., Chahar B.R., Graillot D. Combined use of groundwater modeling and potential zone analysis for management of groundwater. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2011, 13:127-139.
17. Ghose D.K., Panda S.N., Swain P.C. Prediction of water table depth in western region, Orissa using BPNN and RBFN neural networks. J. Hydrol. 2010, 394:296-304.
18. Hiscock, K.M., Rivett, M.O., Davison, R.M. (Eds.), 2002. Sustainable Groundwater Development. Special Publication No. 193, Geological Society, London, UK.
19. Krishna B., Rao Y.R.S., Vijaya T. Modeling groundwater levels in an urban coastal aquifer using artificial neural networks. Hydrol. Process. 2008, 22:1180-1188.
20. Lallahem S., Mania J., Hani A., Najjar Y. On the use of neural networks to evaluate groundwater levels in fractured media. J. Hydrol. 2005, 307(1-4):92-111.
21. Li X., Shu L., Liu L., Yin D., Wen J. Sensitivity analysis of groundwater level in Jinci Spring Basin (China) based on artificial neural network modeling. Hydrogeol. J. 2012, 20:727-738.
22. Lin Y.C., Medina M.A. Incorporating transient storage in conjunctive stream-aquifer modeling. Adv. Water Resour. 2003, 26(9):1001-1019.
23. Maier H.R., Dandy G.C. Understanding the behavior and optimizing the performance of backpropagation neural networks: an empirical study. Environ. Modeling Softw. 1998, 13:179-191.
24. Maier H.R., Dandy G.C. Neural networks for prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modeling issue and application. Environ. Modeling Softw. 2000, 15:101-124.
25. Mall R.K., Gupta A., Singh R., Singh R.S., Rathore L.S. Water resources and climate change: an Indian perspective. Curr. Sci. 2006, 90(12):1610-1626.
26. McDonald, M.G., Harbaugh, A.W., 1988. A Modular Three Dimensional Finite Difference Groundwater Flow Model. US Geological Survey Technical Manual of Water Resources Investigation, Book 6, US Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
27. Mohanty S., Jha M.K., Kumar A., Sudheer K.P. Artificial neural network modeling for groundwater level forecasting in a river island of eastern India. Water Resour. Manage. 2010, 24:1845-1865.
28. Mohanty S., Jha M.K., Kumar A., Jena S.K. Hydrologic and hydrogeologic characterization of a deltaic aquifer system in Orissa, eastern India. Water Resour. Manage. 2012, 26(7):1899-1928.
29. Nayak P.C., Rao Y.R.S., Sudheer K.P. Groundwater level forecasting in a shallow aquifer using artificial neural network approach. Water Resour. Manage. 2006, 20:77-90.
30. Nikolos I.K., Stergiadi M., Papadopoulou M.P., Karatzas G.P. Artificial neural networks as an alternative approach to groundwater numerical modeling and environmental design. Hydrol. Process. 2008, 22:3337-3348.
31. Nourani V., Baghanam A.H., Vousoughi V.D., Alami M.T. Classification of groundwater level data using SOM to develop ANN-based forecasting model. Int. J. Soft Comput. Eng. 2012, 2(1):2231-2307.
32. Onta P.R., Das Gupta A. Regional management modeling of a complex groundwater system for land subsidence control. Water Resour. Manage. 1995, 9(1):1-25.
33. Parkin G., Birkinshaw S.J., Younger P.L., Rao Z., Kirk S. A numerical modeling and neural network approach to estimate the impact of groundwater abstractions on river flows. J. Hydrol. 2007, 339:15-28.
34. Rangarajan R., Athavale R.N. Annual replenishable groundwater potential of India - an estimate based on injected tritium studies. J. Hydrol. 2000, 234(1&2):38-53.
35. Reeve A.S., Warzocha J., Glaser P.H., Siegel D.I. Regional groundwater flow modeling of the Glacial Lake Agassiz Peatlands, Minnesota. J. Hydrol. 2001, 243(2):91-100.
36. Reichard E.G. Groundwater-surface water management with stochastic water supplies: a simulation-optimization approach. Water Resour. Res. 1995, 31(11):2845-2865.
37. Rodell M., Velicogna I., Famiglietti J.S. Satellite-based estimates of groundwater depletion in India. Nature 2009, 460:999-1002.
38. Rodriguez L.B., Cello P.A., Vionett C.A. Modeling stream-aquifer interactions in a shallow aquifer Choele Choel Island, Patagonia, Argentina. Hydrogeol. J. 2006, 14:591-602.
39. Perspectives in Civil Engineering: Commemorating the 150th Anniversary of the American Society of Civil Engineers 2003, ASCE Publication, ASCE, Reston, VA, 401 pp. J.S. Russell (Ed.).
40. Shah T., Molden D., Sakthivadivel R., Seckler D. The Global Groundwater Situation: Overview of Opportunities and Challenges 2000, IWMI, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
41. Sophocleous M.A. Groundwater recharge and sustainability in the high plains aquifer in Kansas, USA. Hydrogeol. J. 2005, 13(2):351-365.
42. Ting C.S., Zhou Y., Vries J.J.de, Simmers I. Development of a preliminary groundwater flow model for water resources management in the Pingtung Plain, Taiwan. Groundwater 1998, 35(6):20-35.
43. Trichakis I.C., Nikolos I.K., Karatzas G.P. Optimal selection of artificial neural network parameters for the prediction of a karstic aquifer's response. Hydrol. Process. 2009, 23(20):2956-2969.
44. Uddameri V. Using statistical and artificial neural network models to forecast potentiometric levels at a deep well in South Texas. Environ. Geol. 2007, 51:885-895.
45. Voss K.A., Famiglietti J.S., Lo M., de Linage C., Rodell M., Swenson S.C. Groundwater depletion in middle east from GRACE with implications for transboundary water management in the Tigris-Euphrates-Western Iran region. Water Resour. Res. 2013, 49:904-914. 10.1002/wrcr.20078.
46. WHI Visual Modflow Professional Edition User's Manual 2005, Waterloo Hydrogeologic Inc., Ontario, Canada, 611 pp.
47. World Water Assessment Program, 2003. The United Nations World Water Development Report 1: Water for People Water for Life. UNESCO, Paris and Berghahn Books, 575 pp.
48. Xu X., Huang G., Zhan H., Qu Z., Huang Q. Integration of SWAP and MODFLOW-2000 for modeling groundwater dynamics in shallow water table areas. J. Hydrol. 2012, 412-413:170-181.
49. Yoon H., Jun S.C., Hyun Y., Bae G.O., Lee K.K. A comparative study of artificial neural networks and support vector machines for predicting groundwater levels in a coastal aquifer. J. Hydrol. 2011, 396:128-138.
50. Zheng C., Bennett G.D. Applied Contaminant Transport Modeling 2002, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 621 pp. second ed.
51. Zume J., Tarhule A. Simulating the impacts of groundwater pumping on stream-aquifer dynamics in semi-arid north-western Oklahoma, USA. Hydrogeol. J. 2008, 16:797-810.