Comprehensive chromosome analysis of blastocysts before implantation using array CGH

Molecular Cytogenetics

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Chung, Mi Kyung ^a   Jeong, Hyeon Jeong ^a   Lee, Jung Hyun ^a   Park, Sang Jin ^b   Chung, Hee Doo ^c   Kang, Ho Young ^b  

^a Seoul Rachel Fertility Center   (South Korea)

^b MG MED Inc   (South Korea)

^c MGMED Clinic   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME LOSS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MONOSOMY; NIDATION; PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC SCREENING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRISOMY;

EID: 84878363873     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17558166     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1755-8166-6-22     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Handyside AH, Kontogianni EH, Hardy K, Winston RM, Nature 1990 344 768 770 10.1038/344768a0 2330030
2. Pregnancies following pre-conception diagnosis of common aneuploidies by fluorescent in-situ hybridization. Verlinsky Y, Cieslak J, Freidine M, Ivakhnenko V, Wolf G, Kovalinskaya L, White M, Lifchez A, Kaplan B, Moise J, et al. Hum Reprod 1995 10 1923 1927 8583011
3. The use of first polar bodies for preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy. Munne S, Dailey T, Sultan KM, Grifo J, Cohen J, Hum Reprod 1995 10 1014 1020 7650111
4. Increased efficiency of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy by testing 12 chromosomes. Colls P, Goodall N, Zheng X, Munne S, Reprod Biomed Online 2009 19 532 538 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.05.002 19909595
5. What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? Experience with blastocyst biopsy and testing for aneuploidy. Jansen RP, Bowman MC, de Boer KA, Leigh DA, Lieberman DB, McArthur SJ, Hum Reprod 2008 23 1476 1478 10.1093/humrep/den129 18539624
6. Detection of aneuploidy in single cells using comparative genomic hybridization. Voullaire L, Wilton L, Slater H, Williamson R, Prenat Diagn 1999 19 846 851 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199909)19:9<846::AID-PD657>3.0.CO;2-# 10521843
7. Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization. Wells D, Delhanty JD, Mol Hum Reprod 2000 6 1055 1062 10.1093/molehr/6.11.1055 11044470
8. Successful pregnancies after application of array-comparative genomic hybridization in PGS-aneuploidy screening. Hellani A, Abu-Amero K, Azouri J, El-Akoum S, Reprod Biomed Online 2008 17 841 847 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60413-0 19079969
9. Aneuploidy detection in single cells using DNA array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Hu DG, Webb G, Hussey N, Mol Hum Reprod 2004 10 283 289 10.1093/humrep/gah038 14985479
10. Single-cell chromosomal imbalances detection by array CGH. Le Caignec C, Spits C, Sermon K, De Rycke M, Thienpont B, Debrock S, Staessen C, Moreau Y, Fryns JP, Van Steirteghem A, et al. Nucleic Acids Res 2006 34 68 10.1093/nar/gkl336 16698960
11. Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol. Johnson DS, Gemelos G, Baner J, Ryan A, Cinnioglu C, Banjevic M, Ross R, Alper M, Barrett B, Frederick J, et al. Hum Reprod 2010 25 1066 1075 10.1093/humrep/dep452 20100701
12. A novel single-cell DNA fingerprinting method successfully distinguishes sibling human embryos. Treff NR, Su J, Tao X, Miller KA, Levy B, Scott RT Jr, Fertil Steril 2010 94 477 484 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.067 19394599
13. Clinical application of comprehensive chromosomal screening at the blastocyst stage. Schoolcraft WB, Fragouli E, Stevens J, Munne S, Katz-Jaffe MG, Wells D, Fertil Steril 2010 94 1700 1706 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.015 19939370
14. Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo? Ly KD, Agarwal A, Nagy ZP, J Assist Reprod Genet 2011 28 833 849 10.1007/s10815-011-9608-7 21743973
15. Idiopathic recurrent miscarriage is caused mostly by aneuploid embryos. Hodes-Wertz B, Grifo J, Ghadir S, Kaplan B, Laskin CA, Glassner M, Munne S, Fertil Steril 2012 98 675 680 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.025 22683012
16. Array CGH analysis shows that aneuploidy is not related to the number of embryos generated. Ata B, Kaplan B, Danzer H, Glassner M, Opsahl M, Tan SL, Munne S, Reprod Biomed Online 2012 24 614 620 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.02.009 22503277
17. Differences in chromosome susceptibility to aneuploidy and survival to first trimester. Munne S, Bahce M, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, Marquez C, Velilla E, Colls P, Oter M, Alikani M, Cohen J, Reprod Biomed Online 2004 8 81 90 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60501-9 14759293
18. Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos. Gutierrez-Mateo C, Colls P, Sanchez-Garcia J, Escudero T, Prates R, Ketterson K, Wells D, Munne S, Fertil Steril 2011 95 953 958 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.010 20971462
19. Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study. Yang Z, Liu J, Collins GS, Salem SA, Liu X, Lyle SS, Peck AC, Sills ES, Salem RD, Mol Cytogenet 2012 5 24 10.1186/1755-8166-5-24 22551456
20. Clinical implementation of whole-genome array CGH as a first-tier test in 5080 pre and postnatal cases. Park SJ, Jung EH, Ryu RS, Kang HW, Ko JM, Kim HJ, Cheon CK, Hwang SH, Kang HY, Mol Cytogenet 2011 4 12 10.1186/1755-8166-4-12 21549014
21. Identification of origin of unknown derivative chromosomes by array-based comparative genomic hybridization using pre- and postnatal clinical samples. Choe J, Kang JK, Bae CJ, Lee DS, Hwang D, Kim KC, Park WY, Lee JH, Seo JS, J Hum Genet 2007 52 934 942 10.1007/s10038-007-0199-1 17940726