In defense of big waiver

Columbia Law Review

Volumn 113, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 265-346

  Barron, David J ^a   Rakoff, Todd D ^a  

^a HARVARD LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878347297     PISSN: 00101958     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Aagaard, Todd S., Regulatory Overlap, Overlapping Legal Fields, and Statutory Discontinuities, 29 Va. Envtl. L.J. 237 (2011).
2. Ackerman, Bruce A., & Richard B. Stewart, Comment, Reforming Environmental Law, 37 Stan. L. Rev. 1333 (1985).
3. Aman, Jr., Alfred C., Administrative Law in a Global Era: Progress, Deregulatory Change, and the Rise of the Administrative Presidency, 73 Cornell L. Rev. 1101 (1988).
4. Barkow, Rachel E., Insulating Agencies: Avoiding Capture Through Institutional Design, 89 Tex. L. Rev. 15 (2010).
5. Biber, Eric, The Importance of Resource Allocation in Administrative Law, 60 Admin. L. Rev. 1 (2008).
6. Black, Derek W., The Congressional Failure to Enforce Equal Protection Through the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 90 B.U. L. Rev. 313 (2010).
7. Bolton, Jonathan R., Note, The Case of the Disappearing Statute: A Legal and Policy Critique of the Use of Section 1115 Waivers To Restructure the Medicaid Program, 37 Colum. J.L. & Soc. Probs. 91 (2003).
8. Dorf, Michael C., & Charles F. Sabel, A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism, 98 Colum. L. Rev. 267 (1998).
9. Ellickson, Robert C., Taming Leviathan: Will the Centralizing Tide of the Twentieth Century Continue into the Twenty-First?, 74 S. Cal. L. Rev. 101 (2000).
10. Epstein, David, & Sharyn O'Halloran, The Nondelegation Doctrine and the Separation of Powers: A Political Science Approach, 20 Cardozo L. Rev. 947 (1999).
11. Farina, Cynthia R., Statutory Interpretation and the Balance of Power in the Administrative State, 89 Colum. L. Rev. 452 (1989).
12. Fiorina, Morris, Divided Government (2d ed. 1996).
13. Freeman, Jody, Collaborative Governance in the Administrative State, 45 UCLA L. Rev. 1 (1997).
14. Freeman, Jody, The Private Role in Public Governance, 75 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 543 (2000).
15. Freeman, Jody, & Jim Rossi, Agency Coordination in Shared Regulatory Space, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1131 (2012).
16. Gersen, Jacob E., Overlapping and Underlapping Jurisdiction in Administrative Law, 2006 Sup. Ct. Rev. 201.
17. Gersen, Jacob E., & Anne Joseph O'Connell, Deadlines in Administrative Law, 156 U. Pa. L. Rev. 923 (2008).
18. Gordon, Mark C., Differing Paradigms, Similar Flaws: Constructing a New Approach to Federalism in Congress and the Court, 14 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. (Symposium Issue) 187 (1996).
19. Greve, Michael S., Against Cooperative Federalism, 70 Miss. L.J. 557 (2000).
20. Howard, Philip K., The Death of Common Sense: How Law Is Suffocating America (2011).
21. Issacharoff, Samuel, & Daniel R. Ortiz, Governing Through Intermediaries, 85 Va. L. Rev. 1627 (1999).
22. Jones, David R., Party Polarization and Legislative Gridlock, 54 Pol. Res. Q. 125 (2001).
23. Kagan, Elena, Presidential Administration, 114 Harv. L. Rev. 2245 (2001).
24. Kanstroom, Daniel, The Better Part of Valor: The REAL ID Act, Discretion, and the Rule of Immigration Law, 51 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 161 (2006).
25. Kelleher, Leslie M., Separation of Powers and Delegations of Authority To Cancel Statutes in the Line Item Veto Act and the Rules Enabling Act, 68 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 395 (2000).
26. Landis, James M., The Administrative Process (1938).
27. Lawson, Gary, Delegation and Original Meaning, 88 Va. L. Rev. 327 (2002).
28. Lessig, Lawrence, Lessons from a Line Item Veto Law, 47 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 1659 (1997).
29. Levin, Ronald M., Understanding Unreviewability in Administrative Law, 74 Minn. L. Rev. 689 (1990).
30. Lobel, Orly, Setting the Agenda for New Governance Research, 89 Minn. L. Rev. 498 (2004).
31. Lowi, Theodore J., Two Roads to Serfdom: Liberalism, Conservatism and Administrative Power, 36 Am. U. L. Rev. 295 (1987).
32. Mann, Thomas E., & Norman J. Ornstein, The Broken Branch: How Congress Is Failing America and How To Get It Back on Track (2006).
33. Marciarille, Ann Marie, & J. Bradford DeLong, Bending the Health Cost Curve: The Promise and Peril of the Independent Payment Advisory Board, 22 Health Matrix 75 (2012).
34. Mashaw, Jerry L., & Dylan S. Calsyn, Block Grants, Entitlements, and Federalism: A Conceptual Map of Contested Terrain, 14 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 297 (1996).
35. McConnell, Michael W., The Politics of Returning Power to the States, 6 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 103 (1982).
36. Nagy, Donna M., Judicial Reliance on Regulatory Interpretations in SEC No-Action Letters: Current Problems and a Proposed Framework, 83 Cornell L. Rev. 921 (1998).
37. Neumann, Gerald L., On the Adequacy of Direct Review After the REAL ID Act of 2005, 51 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 133 (2006).
38. Peake, Jeffrey S., Coalition Building and Overcoming Legislative Gridlock in Foreign Policy, 1947-98, 32 Presidential Stud. Q. 67 (2002).
39. Posner, Eric A., & Adrian Vermeule, Interring the Nondelegation Doctrine, 69 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1721 (2002).
40. Rabin, Robert L., Federal Regulation in Historical Perspective, 38 Stan. L. Rev. 1189 (1986).
41. Rakoff, Todd D., The Shape of the Law in the American Administrative State, 11 Tel Aviv U. Stud. L. 9 (1992).
42. Rubin, Edward L., Law and Legislation in the Administrative State, 89 Colum. L. Rev. 369 (1989).
43. Ruhl, J.B., & James Salzman, Mozart and the Red Queen: The Problem of Regulatory Accretion in the Administrative State, 91 Geo. L.J. 757 (2003).
44. Schuck, Peter H., Legal Complexity: Some Causes, Consequences, and Cures, 42 Duke L.J. 1 (1992).
45. Seidenfeld, Mark, Bending the Rules: Flexible Regulation andConstraints on Agency Discretion, 51 Admin. L. Rev. 429 (1999).
46. Shapiro, Sidney A., & Robert L. Glicksman, Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Quiet Revolution in Administrative Law, 1988 Duke L.J. 819.
47. Sigelman, Lee, et al., Vote Choice and the Preference for Divided Government: Lessons of 1992, 41 Am. J. Pol. Sci. 879 (1997).
48. Sohoni, Mila, The Idea of Too Much Law, 80 Fordham L. Rev. 1585 (2012).
49. Stewart, Richard B., Madison's Nightmare, 57 U. Chi. L. Rev. 335 (1990).
50. Stewart, Richard B., The Reformation of American Administrative Law, 88 Harv. L. Rev. 1667 (1975).
51. Stockdale, Holly, Cong. Research Serv., R40915, An Overview ofProposals To Establish an Independent Commission or Board in Medicare (2010).
52. Strauss, Peter L., On Resegregating the Worlds of Statute and Common Law, 1994 Sup. Ct. Rev. 429.
53. Sunstein, Cass R., Nondelegation Canons, 67 U. Chi. L. Rev. 315 (2000).
54. Sunstein, Cass R., Reviewing Agency Inaction After Heckler v. Chaney, 52 U. Chi. L. Rev. 653 (1985).
55. Super, David A., Rethinking Fiscal Federalism, 118 Harv. L. Rev. 2544 (2005).
56. Timpane, P. Michael, Federal Aid to Schools: Its Limited Future, 38 Law & Contemp. Probs. 493 (1974).
57. Tomz, Michael, & Robert P. Van Houweling, Political Pledges as Credible Commitments (Mar. 2012) (unpublished manuscript), available at http://www.stanford.edu/tomz/working/TomzVanHouweling-Pledges-2012-03-27.pdf.
58. Tushnet, Mark, Foreword: The New Constitutional Order and the Chastening of Constitutional Aspiration, 113 Harv. L. Rev. 29 (1999).
59. U.S. Dep't of Educ., ESEA Flexibility (2011).