Validation of finite element model of transcranial electrical stimulation using scalp potentials: Implications for clinical dose

Journal of Neural Engineering

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Datta, Abhishek ^a   Zhou, Xiang ^a   Su, Yuzhou ^a   Parra, Lucas C ^a   Bikson, Marom ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRODE PLACEMENT; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD MODEL (FEM); FINITE ELEMENT MODELS; HIGH-RESOLUTION MODELS; RECORDING ELECTRODES; STIMULATION ELECTRODES; TRANSCRANIAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATIONS; VOLTAGE DISTRIBUTION;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

STIMULATED EMISSION;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTROLLED STUDY; COUNTERCURRENT FLOW; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRODE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; HIGH RESOLUTION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MALE; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SAFETY; SCALP; SKIN; TRANSCRANIAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; SCALP; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 84878298044     PISSN: 17412560     EISSN: 17412552     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/3/036018     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abascal J F et al 2008 Use of anisotropic modelling in electrical impedance tomography: description of method and preliminary assessment of utility in imaging brain function in the adult human head Neuroimage 43 258-68
2. Antal A, Boros K, Poreisz C, Chaieb L, Terney D and Paulus W 2008 Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans Brain Stimul. 1 97-105 (Pubitemid 351689964)
3. Antal A, Bikson M, Datta A, Lafon B, Dechent P, Parra L C and Paulus W 2013 Imaging artifacts induced by electrical stimulation during conventional FMRI of the brain Neuroimage at press (PMID: 23099102)
4. Bayford R H, Gibson A, Tizzard A, Tidswell T and Holder D S 2001 Solving the forward problem in electrical impedance tomography for the human head using IDEAS (integrated design engineering analysis software), a finite element modelling tool Physiol. Meas. 22 55-64 (Pubitemid 32186757)
5. Bikson M and Datta A 2012 Guidelines for precise and accurate computational models of tDCS Brain Stimul. 5 430-1
6. Bikson M, Datta A, Rahman A and Scaturro J 2010 Electrode montages for tDCS and weak transcranial electrical stimulation: role of 'return' electrode's position and size Clin. Neurophysiol. 121 1976-8
7. Bikson M, Rahman A, Datta A, Fregni F and Merabet L 2012 High-resolution modeling assisted design of customized and individualized transcranial direct current stimulation protocols Neuromodulation 15 306-15
8. Borckardt J J et al 2012 A pilot study of the tolerability and effects of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on pain perception J. Pain 13 112-20
9. Bossetti C A, Birdno M J and Grill W M 2008 Analysis of the quasi-static approximation for calculating potentials generated by neural stimulation J. Neural Eng. 5 44-53 (Pubitemid 351366602)
10. Calancie B, Harris W, Broton J G, Alexeeva N and Green B A 1998 Threshold-level multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation of motor cortex for intraoperative monitoring of spinal motor tracts: description of method and comparison to somatosensory evoked potential monitoring J. Neurosurg. 88 457-70 (Pubitemid 28114718)
11. Dasilva A F, Mendonca M E, Zaghi S, Lopes M, Dossantos M F, Spierings E L, Bajwa Z, Datta A, Bikson M and Fregni F 2012 tDCS-induced analgesia and electrical fields in pain-related neural networks in chronic migraine Headache 52 1283-95
12. Datta A, Baker J M, Bikson M and Fridriksson J 2011 Individualized model predicts brain current flow during transcranial direct-current stimulation treatment in responsive stroke patient Brain Stimul. 4 169-74
13. Datta A, Bansal V, Diaz J, Patel J, Reato D and Bikson M 2009 Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad Brain Stimul. 2 201-7
14. Datta A, Dmochowski J P, Guleyupoglu B, Bikson M and Fregni F 2013 Cranial electrotherapy stimulation and transcranial pulsed current stimulation: a computer based high-resolution modeling study Neuroimage 65 280-7
15. Datta A, Elwassif M, Battaglia F and Bikson M 2008 Transcranial current stimulation focality using disc and ring electrode configurations: FEM analysis J. Neural Eng. 5 163-74 (Pubitemid 351999184)
16. Datta A, Truong D, Minhas P, Parra L C and Bikson M 2012 Inter-individual variation during transcranial direct current stimulation and normalization of dose using MRI-derived computational models Front. Psychiatry 3 91
17. Delorme A and Makeig S 2004 EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics J. Neurosci. Methods 134 9-21 (Pubitemid 38224183)
18. Dmochowski J P, Datta A, Bikson M, Su Y and Parra L C 2011 Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target J. Neural Eng. 8 046011
19. Dymond A M, Coger R W and Serafetinides E A 1975 Intracerebral current levels in man during electrosleep therapy Biol. Psychiatry 10 101-4
20. Faria P, Hallett M and Miranda PC 2011 A finite element analysis of the effect of electrode area and inter-electrode distance on the spatial distribution of the current density in tDCS J. Neural Eng. 8 066017
21. Ferdjallah M, Bostick F X Jr. and Barr R E 1996 Potential and current density distributions of cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) in a four-concentric-spheres model IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 43 939-43 (Pubitemid 26282067)
22. Fregni F et al 2005 Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory Exp. Brain Res. 166 23-30 (Pubitemid 41451033)
23. Gilad O and Holder D S 2009 Impedance changes recorded with scalp electrodes during visual evoked responses: implications for electrical impedance tomography of fast neural activity Neuroimage 47 514-22
24. Gilad O, Horesh L and Holder D S 2007 Design of electrodes and current limits for low frequency electrical impedance tomography of the brain Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 45 621-33 (Pubitemid 47263590)
25. Gilad O, Horesh L and Holder D S 2009 A modelling study to inform specification and optimal electrode placement for imaging of neuronal depolarization during visual evoked responses by electrical and magnetic detection impedance tomography Physiol. Meas. 30 S201-24
26. Halko M A, Datta A, Plow E B, Scaturro J, Bikson M and Merabet L B 2011 Neuroplastic changes following rehabilitative training correlate with regional electrical field induced with tDCS Neuroimage 57 885-91
27. Im C H, Park J H, Shim M, Chang W H and Kim Y H 2012 Evaluation of local electric fields generated by transcranial direct current stimulation with an extracephalic reference electrode based on realistic 3D body modeling Phys. Med. Biol. 57 2137-50
28. Kanai R, Chaieb L, Antal A, Walsh V and Paulus W 2008 Frequency-dependent electrical stimulation of the visual cortex Curr. Biol. 18 1839-43
29. Lisanby S H 2007 Electroconvulsive therapy for depression New Engl. J. Med. 357 1939-45 (Pubitemid 350074688)
30. Marshall L, Helgadottir H, Molle M and Born J 2006 Boosting slow oscillations during sleep potentiates memory Nature 444 610-3 (Pubitemid 44864437)
31. Mendonca M E et al 2011 Transcranial DC stimulation in fibromyalgia: Optimized cortical target supported by high-resolution computational models J. Pain 12 610-7
32. Minhas P et al 2010 Electrodes for high-definition transcutaneous DC stimulation for applications in drug delivery and electrotherapy, including tDCS J. Neurosci. Methods 190 188-97
33. Miranda P C, Lomarev M and Hallett M 2006 Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation Clin. Neurophysiol. 117 1623-9 (Pubitemid 43947714)
34. Nitsche M A and Paulus W 2000 Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation J. Physiol. 527 633-39
35. Oh T, Gilad O, Ghosh A, Schuettler M and Holder D S 2011 A novel method for recording neuronal depolarization with recording at 125-825 Hz: implications for imaging fast neural activity in the brain with electrical impedance tomography Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 49 593-604
36. Parazzini M, Fiocchi S, Rossi E, Paglialonga A and Ravazzani P 2011 Transcranial direct current stimulation: estimation of the electric field and of the current density in an anatomical human head model IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 58 1773-80
37. Rothwell J, Burke D, Hicks R, Stephen J, Woodforth I and Crawford M 1994 Transcranial electrical stimulation of the motor cortex in man: further evidence for the site of activation J. Physiol. 481 243-50 (Pubitemid 24361364)
38. Rush S and Driscoll D A 1968 Current distribution in the brain from surface electrodes Anesth. Analg. 47 717-23
39. Sadleir R J, Vannorsdall T D, Schretlen D J and Gordon B 2010 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in a realistic head model Neuroimage 51 1310-8
40. Salvador R, Mekonnen A, Ruffini G and Miranda P C 2010 Modeling the electric field induced in a high resolution head model during transcranial current stimulation Proc. Annu. Conf. of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society pp 2073-6
41. Saypol J M, Roth B J, Cohen L G and Hallett M 1991 A theoretical comparison of electric and magnetic stimulation of the brain Ann. Biomed. Eng. 19 317-28
42. Schroeder M J and Barr R E 2001 Quantitative analysis of the electroencephalogram during cranial electrotherapy stimulation Clin. Neurophysiol. 112 2075-83 (Pubitemid 32995975)
43. Smith S M 2002 Fast robust automated brain extraction Hum. Brain Mapp. 17 143-55 (Pubitemid 35253488)
44. Stecker M M 2005 Transcranial electric stimulation of motor pathways: a theoretical analysis Comput. Biol. Med. 35 133-55 (Pubitemid 39573156)
45. Suh H S, Lee W H, Cho Y S, Kim J H and Kim T S 2010 Reduced spatial focality of electrical field in tDCS with ring electrodes due to tissue anisotropy Proc. Annu. Conf. of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society pp 2053-6
46. Tidswell T, Gibson A, Bayford R H and Holder D S 2001 Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography of human brain activity Neuroimage 13 283-94 (Pubitemid 34185017)
47. Vonach M et al 2012 A method for rapid production of subject specific finite element meshes for electrical impedance tomography of the human head Physiol. Meas. 33 801-16
48. Wagner T, Fregni F, Fecteau S, Grodzinsky A, Zahn M and Pascual-Leone A 2007 Transcranial direct current stimulation: a computer-based human model study Neuroimage 35 1113-24 (Pubitemid 46507817)
49. Windhoff M, Opitz A and Thielscher A 2013 Electric field calculations in brain stimulation based on finite elements: an optimized processing pipeline for the generation and usage of accurate individual head models Hum. Brain Mapp. 34 923-5
50. Zhang Y, Brady M and Smith S 2001 Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20 45-57 (Pubitemid 32293419)