High-resolution modeling assisted design of customized and individualized transcranial direct current stimulation protocols

Neuromodulation

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 306-315

  Bikson, Marom ^a   Rahman, Asif ^a   Datta, Abhishek ^b   Fregni, Felipe ^b   Merabet, Lotfi ^b  

^a City University of New York   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Electrical stimulation; FEM; fMRI; head model; lesion; modeling; neuromodulation; skull defects; stroke; tDCS; TMS; traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BRAIN DAMAGE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPUTER MODEL; DATA ANALYSIS; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION THERAPY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROMODULATION; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; SKULL DEFECT; STROKE; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; TREATMENT INDICATION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 84864674155     PISSN: 10947159     EISSN: 15251403     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00481.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Zentner J,. Noninvasive motor evoked potential monitoring during neurosurgical operations on the spinal cord. Neurosurgery 1989; 24: 709-712.
2. Ardolino G, Bossi B, Barbieri S, Priori A,. Non-synaptic mechanisms underlie the after-effects of cathodal transcutaneous direct current stimultion of the human brain. J Physiol 2005; 568: 653-663.
3. Brunoni ARNM, Bolognini N, Bikson M, et al,. Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions. Brain Stimul 2011;in press.
4. Peterchev A, Wagner T, Miranda P, et al,. Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices. Brain Stimul 2011;in press.
5. Datta A, Baker J, Bikson M, Fridriksson J,. Individualized model predicts brain current flow during transcranial direct-current stimulation treatment in responsive stroke patient. Brain Stimul 2011; 4: 169-174.
6. Miranda PC, Lomarev M, Hallett M,. Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2006; 117: 1623-1629.
7. Wagner T, Fregni F, Fecteau S, Grodzinsky A, Zahn M, Pascual-Leone A,. Transcranial direct current stimulation: a computer-based human model study. Neuroimage 2007; 35: 1113-1124.
8. Datta A, Elwassif M, Battaglia F, Bikson M,. Transcranial current stimulation focality using disc and ring electrode configurations: FEM analysis. J Neural Eng 2008; 5: 163-174.
9. Oostendorp TF, Hengeveld YA, Wolters CH, Stinstra J, van Elswijk G, Stegeman DF,. Modeling transcranial DC stimulation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008; 2008: 4226-4229.
10. Datta A, Elwassif M, Bikson M,. Bio-heat transfer model of transcranial DC stimulation: comparison of conventional pad versus ring electrode. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009; 2009: 670-673.
11. Datta A, Bansal V, Diaz J, Patel J, Reato D, Bikson M,. Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad. Brain Stimul 2009; 2: 201-207.
12. Miranda PC, Faria P, Hallett M,. What does the ratio of injected current to electrode area tell us about current density in the brain during tDCS? Clin Neurophysiol 2009; 120: 1183-1187.
13. Suh HS, Kim SH, Lee WH, Kim TS,. Realistic simulation of transcranial direct current stimulation via 3-D high resolution finite element analysis: effect of tissue anisotropy. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009; 2009: 638-641.
14. Datta A, Bikson M, Fregni F,. Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with skull defects and skull plates: high-resolution computational FEM study of factors altering cortical current flow. Neuroimage 2010; 52: 1268-1278.
15. Sadleir RJ, Vannorsdall TD, Schretlen DJ, Gordon B,. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in a realistic head model. Neuroimage 2010; 51: 1310-1318.
16. Salvador R, Mekonnen A, Ruffini G, Miranda PC,. Modeling the electric field induced in a high resolution head model during transcranial current stimulation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010; 2010: 2073-2076.
17. Bikson M, Datta A, Rahman A, Scaturro J,. Electrode montages for tDCS and weak transcranial electrical stimulation: role of "return" electrode's position and size. Clin Neurophysiol 2010; 121: 1976-1978.
18. Parazzini M, Fiocchi S, Rossi E, Paglialonga A, Ravazzani P,. Transcranial direct current stimulation: estimation of the electric field and of the current density in an anatomical head model. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011; 58: 1773-1780.
19. Halko MADA, Plow EB, Scaturro J, Bikson M, Merabet LB,. Neuroplastic changes following rehabilitative training correlate with regional electrical field induced with tDCS. Neuroimage 2011; 57: 885-891.
20. Mendonca ME, Santana MB, Baptista AF, et al,. Transcranial DC stimulation in fibromyalgia: optimized cortical target supported by high-resolution computational models. J Pain 2011; 12: 610-617.
21. Turkeltaub PE, Benson J, Hamilton RH, Datta A, Bikson M, Coslett HB,. Left lateralizing transcranial direct current stimulation improves reading efficiency. Brain Stimul 2011;in press.
22. DaSilva A, Zaghi S, Lopes M, et al,. tDCS-induced analgesia and electrical fields in pain-related neural networks in chronic migraine. Headache 2012;in press.
23. Dmochowski JP, Datta A, Bikson M, Su Y, Parra LC,. Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target. J Neural Eng 2011; 8: 046011.
24. Borckardt J, Bikson M, Frohman H, et al,. A pilot study of the tolerability, safety and effects of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on pain perception. J Pain 2012; 13: 112-120.
25. Rush S, Driscoll DA,. Current distribution in the brain from surface electrodes. Anesth Analg 1968; 47: 717-723.
26. Smith SM,. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 2002; 17: 143-155.
27. Lindenberg R, Zhu LL, Schlaug G,. Combined central and peripheral stimulation to facilitate motor recovery after stroke: the effect of number of sessions on outcome. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012;in press.
28. Nitsche MA, Paulus W,. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 2001; 57: 1899-1901.
29. Bikson M, Inoue M, Akiyama H, et al,. Effects of uniform extracellular DC electric fields on excitability in rat hippocampal slices in vitro. J Physiol 2004; 557: 175-190.
30. Miranda PC, Correia L, Salvador R, Basser PJ,. The role of tissue heterogeneity in neural stimulation by applied electric fields. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007; 2007: 1715-1718.
31. Joucla S, Yvert B,. The "mirror" estimate: an intuitive predictor of membrane polarization during extracellular stimulation. Biophys J 2009; 96: 3495-3508.
32. Rattay F,. Analysis of models for external stimulation of axons. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1986; 33: 974-977.
33. Holsheimer J,. Computer modelling of spinal cord stimulation and its contribution to therapeutic efficacy. Spinal Cord 1998; 36: 531-540.
34. McIntyre CC, Miocinovic S, Butson CR,. Computational analysis of deep brain stimulation. Expert Rev Med Devices 2007; 4: 615-622.
35. Fregni F, Thome-Souza S, Nitsche MA, Freedman SD, Valente KD, Pascual-Leone A,. A controlled clinical trial of cathodal DC polarization in patients with refractory epilepsy. Epliepsia 2006; 47: 335-342.
36. Fridriksson J,. Measuring and inducing brain plasticity in chronic aphasia. J Commun Disord 2011; 44: 557-563.
37. Schneider HD, Hopp JP,. The use of the Bilingual Aphasia Test for assessment and transcranial direct current stimulation to modulate language acquisition in minimally verbal children with autism. Clin Linguist Phon 2011; 25: 640-654.
38. Varga ET, Terney D, Atkins MD, et al,. Transcranial direct current stimulation in refractory continuous spikes and waves during slow sleep: a controlled study. Epilepsy Res 2011; 97: 142-145.
39. Mattai A, Miller R, Weisinger B, et al,. Tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation in childhood-onset schizophrenia. Brain Stimul 2011; 4: 275-280.
40. Wolters CH, Anwander A, Tricoche X, Weinstein D, Koch MA, MacLeod RS,. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return currentcomputation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study usinghigh-resolution finite element modeling. Neuroimage 2006; 30: 813-826.