What Values in Design? The Challenge of Incorporating Moral Values into Design

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 271-287

  Manders Huits, Noëmi ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Applied ethics; Awareness; Design; Ethics of technology; Methodology; Technology; Value conscious design; Value sensitive design; Values

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING; ETHICAL THEORY; ETHICS; HUMAN; MORALITY; REVIEW; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY;

ENGINEERING; ETHICAL ANALYSIS; ETHICAL THEORY; HUMANS; MORALS; SOCIAL VALUES; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 79959592508     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: 16605454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-010-9198-2     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Albrechtslund, A. (2007). Ethics and technology design. Ethics and Information Technology, 9, 63-72.
2. Asveld, L., & Roeser, S. (Eds.). (2009). The ethics of technological risk. London: Earthscan.
3. Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
4. Brey, P. (2001). Disclosive computer ethics. In R. A. Spinello & H. T. Tavani (Eds.), Readings in cyberethics (pp. 51-62). Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers Inc.
5. Camp, L. J. (2003). Design for trust. In R. Falcone (Ed.), Trust, reputation and security: Theories and practice. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
6. Cummings, M. L. (2006). Integrating ethics in design through the value-sensitive design approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12, 701-715.
7. Elmer, G. (2004). Profiling machines: Mapping the personal information economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
8. Flanagan, M., Howe, D., & Nissenbaum, H. (2005). Values at play: Design tradeoffs in socially-oriented game design. In Proceedings of CHI 2005 (pp. 751-760).
9. Flanagan, M., Howe, D., & Nissenbaum, H. (2008). Embodying values in technology: Theory and practice. In J. van den Hoven & J. Weckert (Eds.), Information technology and moral philosophy (pp. 322-353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Florman, S. C. (1987). The civilized engineer. New York: St. Martin's Press.
11. Freeman, R. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 409-421.
12. Friedman, B. (2004). Value sensitive design. In W. S. Bainbridge (Ed.), Berkshire encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. Great Barrington: Berkshire Publishing Group.
13. Friedman, B. & Kahn Jr., P. H. (2000). New directions: A value-sensitive design approach to augmented reality. In Conference proceedings of dare 2000: Design of augmented reality environments (pp. 163-164). New York: Association for Computing Machinery Press.
14. Friedman, B., & Kahn, P. H., Jr. (2003). Human values, ethics, and design. In J. A. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook (pp. 1177-1201). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Jr., & Borning, A. (2002a). Value sensitive design: Theory and methods. UW CSE technical report 02-12-01. Seattle: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington.
16. Friedman, B., Nissenbaum, H., Hurley, D., Howe, D. C., & Felten, E. (2002b). Users' conceptions of risk and harms on the web: A comparative study, CHI 2002: Changing the world, changing ourselves. Accessed April 2, 2009, from http://doi. acm. org/10. 1145/506443. 506510.
17. Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Jr., & Borning, A. (2006). Value sensitive design and information systems. In P. Zhang & D. Galletta (Eds.), Human-computer interaction in management information systems: Foundations (pp. 348-372). New York: Armonk. Reprinted Sharpe, M. E., (2008) In Himma K. E. & H. E. Tavani (Eds.), The handbook of information and computer ethics (pp. 69-101). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
18. Introna, L. D., & Nissenbaum, H. F. (2000). Shaping the Web: Why the politics of search engines matters. The Information Society, 16(3), 169-186.
19. Jacko, J. A., & Sears, A. (Eds.). (2007). The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
20. Joerges, B. (1999). Do politics have artefacts? Social Studies of Science, 29(3), 411-431.
21. Lessig, L. (1999) Code and other laws of cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
22. Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media Society, 10(3), 393-411.
23. Manders-Huits, N. & Zimmer, M. (2007). Values and pragmatic action: The challenges of engagement with technical design communities. In L. Hinman, P. Brey, L. Floridi, F. Grodzinsky, & L. Introna (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh international conference of computer ethics: philosophical enquiry (pp. 238-248). Enschede: Center for Telematics and Information Technology.
24. Manders-Huits, N., & Zimmer, M. (2009). Values and pragmatic action: The challenges of introducing ethical intelligence in technical design communities. International Review of Information Ethics, 10(2), 37-45.
25. Mitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
26. Nissenbaum, H. (2005). Values in technical design. In C. Mitcham (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science, technology, and ethics (pp. 66-70). New York: Macmillan.
27. Schmidtz, D. (1995). Rational choice and moral agency. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
28. Sollie, P. (2007). Ethics, technology development and uncertainty: An outline for any future ethics of technology. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 5(4), 293-306.
29. Sollie, P. (2009). On uncertainty in ethics and technology. In P. Sollie & M. Düwell (Eds.), Evaluating New Technologies: Methodological Problems for the Ethical Assessment of Technological Developments. Series of The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology (Vol. 3, pp. 141-158). Dordrecht: Springer.
30. van den Hoven, J. (2005). Design for values and values for design. Information Age, 2005, 4-7.
31. van den Hoven, J. (2008). Moral methodology and information technology. In K. E. Himma & H. T. Tavani (Eds.), The handbook of information and computer ethics (pp. 49-69). New York: Wiley.
32. van den Hoven, J. (2010) The use of normative theories in computer ethics. In L. Floridi (Ed.), The cambridge handbook of information and computer ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. van de Poel, I. (2009). Values in engineering design. In A. Meijers (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophy of science. Volume 9: Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences (pp. 973-1006). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
34. Vedder, A. & Wachbroit, R. (2003). Reliability of information on the Internet: Some distinctions. Ethics and Information Technology, 5, 211-215.
35. Vermaas, P., & Houkes, W. (2004). Action versus functions. A plea for an alternative metaphysics of artifacts. Monist, 87, 52-71.
36. Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121-136.
37. Zimmer, M. (2008). Privacy on planet Google: Using the theory of "Contextual Integrity" to expose the privacy threats of Google's quest for the perfect search engine. Journal of Business & Technology Law, 3(2), 109-126.