ShearWave™ elastography BE1 multinational breast study: Additional SWE™ features support potential to downgrade BI-RADS®-3 lesions

Ultraschall in der Medizin

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 254-259

  Schafer F K W ^a   Hooley, R J ^b   Ohlinger, R ^c   Hahne, U ^c   Madjar, H ^d   Svensson, W E ^e   Balu Maestro, C ^f   Juhan, V ^g   Athanasiou, A ^h   Mundinger, A ⁱ   Order, B ^a   Locatelli, M ^j   Cosgrove, D ^k   Wolf, O J ^l   Henry, J P ^m   Moutfi, M ⁿ   Gay, J M ^o   Cohen Bacrie, C ^p  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

^d DKD   (Germany)

^e CHARING CROSS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^f CENTRE ANTOINE LACASSAGNE   (France)

^g TIMONE HOSPITAL   (France)

^h INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

ⁱ MarienHospital Osnabruck   (Germany)

^j Ospedale Civile di Gorizia   (Italy)

^k HAMMERSMITH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^l Gesellschafter RadiologieWitten ^*  (Germany)

^m SuperSonic Imagine   (France)

ⁿ UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS   (France)

^o Education   (France)

^p EDHEC Business School   (France)

more..

Author keywords

breast; diagnostic radiology; tumor; ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER GRADING; CANCER STAGING; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; ELASTOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOLOGY; RISK; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT; CLINICAL TRIAL; DEVICES; PROCEDURES;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; NEOPLASM STAGING; RISK; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84878236805     PISSN: 01724614     EISSN: 14388782     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1335523     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Stavros A. T., Thickman D., Rapp C. L. et al. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology: 1995; 196 123 34
2. ®: Ultrasound. 1st Ed Reston American College of Radiology: 2003
3. Bamber J., Cosgrove D., Dietrich C. F. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Ultrasound Elastography. Part 1: Basic Principles and Technology. Ultraschall in Med: 2013; 34 169 184
4. Cosgrove D., Piscaglia F., Bamber J. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Ultrasound Elastography. Part 2: Clinical Applications. Ultraschall in Med: 2013; 10.1055/s-0033-1335375
5. Garra B. S., Cespedes E. I., Ophir J. et al. Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. Radiology: 1997; 202 79 86 (Pubitemid 27024111)
6. Bercoff J., Tanter M., Fink M. Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control: 2004; 51 396 409
7. Cosgrove D. O., Berg W. A., Doré C. J. et al. the BE1 Study Group. Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible. Eur Radiol: 2011; Epub ahead of print
8. Berg W., Cosgrove D., Doré J. C. et al. Shearwave Elastography Improves the Specificity of Breast Ultrasound: The BE1 Multinational Study of 939 Masses. Radiology: 2012; 262 435 449
9. ® lexicon for US and mammography:interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology: 2006; 239 385 391
10. Chiorean A. R., Duma M. M., Dudea S. M. et al. Typical and Unusual Sonoelastographic Patterns of Breast Cystic Lesions: Impact on BI-RADS Classification. Ultraschall in Med: 2012; 33 E138 E144
11. Ciurea A. I., Bolboaca S. D., Ciortea C. A. et al. The technical factors on sonoelastographic assessment of solid breast nodules. Ultraschall in Med: 2011; 32 27 34
12. Scaperrotta G., Ferranti C., Costa C. et al. Role of sono-elastography in non-palpable breast lesions. Eur Radiol: 2008; 18 2381 2389
13. Ciurea A. I., Bolboaca S. D., Ciortea C. A. et al. The Influence of Technical Factors on Sonoelastographic Assessment of Solid Breast Nodules. Ultraschall in Med: 2011; 32 27 34
14. Schaefer F. KW, Heer I., Schaefer P. J. et al. Breast ultrasound elastography - Results of 193 breast lesions in a prospective study with histopathologic correlation. Eur J Radiol: 2011; 77 450 456
15. Isermann R., Grunwald S., Hatzung G. et al. Breast lesion sizing by B-Mode Imaging and Sonoelastography in comparison to histopathological Sizing - a prospective study. Ultraschall in Med: 2011; 32 21 26
16. Evans A., Whelehan P., Thomson K. et al. Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses. Breast Cancer Res: 2010; 12 R104
17. Athanasiou A., Tardivon A., Tanter M. et al. Breast lesions: Quantitative Elastography with Supersonic Shear Imaging - Preliminary results. Radiology: 2010; 256 297 303
18. Itoh A., Ueno E., Tohno E. et al. Breast disease: Clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology: 2006; 239 341 350
19. Adamietz B. R., Meier-Meitinger M., Fasching P. et al. New diagnostic criteria in Real-Time Elastography for the assessment of breast lesions. Ultraschall in Med: 2011; 32 67 73
20. ®-US classification system with Sonoelastography. Ultraschall in Med: 2011; 31 484 491
21. Hall T. J., Zhu Y., Spalding C. S. In vivo real-time freehand palpation imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol: 2003; 29 427 435 (Pubitemid 36434331)
22. Hiltawsky K. M., Kruger M., Starke C. et al. Freehand ultrasound elastography of breast lesions: clinical results. Ultrasound Med Biol: 2001; 27 1461 1469 (Pubitemid 34028101)
23. Krouskop T. A., Younes P. S., Srinivasan S. et al. Differences in the compressive stress-strain response of infiltrating ductal carcinomas with and without lobular features: implications for mammography and elastography. Ultrason Imaging: 2003; 25 162 170 (Pubitemid 38159966)
24. Fischer T., Peisker U., Fiedor S. et al. Significant Differentiation of Focal Breast Lesions: Raw Data-Based Calculation of Strain Ratio. Ultraschall in Med: 2012; 33 357 365
25. Adamietz B. R., Kahmann L., Fasching P. A. et al. Differentiation Between Phyllodes Tumor and Fibroadenoma Using Real-Time Elastography. Ultraschall in Med: 2011; 32 E75 E79
26. Farrokh A., Wojcinski S., Degenhardt F. et al. Diagnostische Aussagekraft der Strain-Ratio-Messung zur Unterscheidung zwischen malignen und benignen Brusttumoren. Ultraschall in Med: 2011; 32 400 405
27. Fu C. Y., Hsu H. H., Yu J. C. et al. Influence of Age on PPV of Sonographic BI-RADS Categories 3, 4, and 5. Ultraschall in Med: 2011; 32 8 13
28. Graf O., Helbich T. H., Hopf G. et al. Probably benign breast masses at US:is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy? Radiology: 2007; 244 87 93 (Pubitemid 46981961)
29. Harvey J. A., Nicholson B. T., Lorusso A. P. et al. Short-term follow-up of palpable breast lesions with benign imaging features: evaluation of 375 lesions in 320 women. Am J Roentgenol: 2009; 193 1723 1730