Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases forthe assessment of breast lesions: Improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography

Ultraschall in der Medizin

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 484-491

  Wojcinski, S ^a   Farrokh, A ^a   Weber, S ^b   Thomas, A ^c   Fischer, T ^c   Slowinski, T ^c   Schmidt, W ^d   Degenhardt, F ^a  

^a FRANZISKUS HOSPITAL   (Germany)

^b Hochtaunus Kliniken   (Germany)

^c CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^d SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

breast; neoplasms; ultrasound; ultrasound 2D

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; BREAST; BREAST TUMOR; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; ELASTOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; LUNG CARCINOMA; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; CHILD; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MIDDLE AGED; REFERENCE STANDARDS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957726812     PISSN: 01724614     EISSN: 14388782     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245282     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Wild J J., Neal D. Use of high-frequency ultrasonic waves for detecting changes of texture in living tissue. Lancet 1951 1 655-657
2. Wild J J., Reid J H. Echographic visualization of the living intact human breast. Cancer Res 1954 14 227-282
3. Zonderland H M., Coerkamp E G., Hermans J et al. Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography. Radiology 1999 213 413-422
4. Gordon P B., Goldenberg S L. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound. A retrospective review. Cancer 1995 76 626-630
5. Kolb T M., Lichy J, Newhouse J H. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 1998 207 191-199
6. Buchberger W, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Springer P et al. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. Am J Roentgenol 1999 173 921-927
7. Buchberger W, Niehoff A, Obrist P et al. Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high resolution sonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2000 21 325-336
8. Corsetti V, Ferrari A, Ghirardi M et al. Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammographically occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breasts. Radiol Med 2006 111 440-448
9. Stavros A T., Thickman D, Rapp C L. et al. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995 196 123-134
10. Ueno E, Tohno E, Soeda S et al. Dynamic tests in real-time breast echography. Ultrasound Med Biol 1988 14 53-57
11. Okada K, Matsumura T, Mitake T. Development of real-time tissue elastography. Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 2005 61 811-816
12. Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R et al. Thyroid gland tumor diagnosis at US elastography. Radiology 2005 237 202-211
13. Lorenz A, Ermert H, Sommerfeld H J. et al. Ultrasound elastography of the prostate. A new technique for tumor detection. Ultraschall in Med 2000 21 8-15
14. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006 239 341-350
15. Frey H. Realtime elastography. A new ultrasound procedure for the reconstruction of tissue elasticity. Radiologe 2003 43 850-855
16. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS®) ultrasound. American College of Radiology Reston, Va 2003 4th ed http://www.acr.org
17. Insana M F., Bamber J C. Tissue motion and elasticity imaging. Phys Med Biol 2000 45 2p preceding 1409
18. Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H et al. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging 1991 13 111-134
19. Cespedes I, Ophir J, Ponnekanti H et al. Elastography: elasticity imaging using ultrasound with application to muscle and breast in vivo. Ultrason Imaging 1993 15 73-88
20. Wojcinski S, Maltaris T, Dupont J et al. Sonographic evaluation of axillary lymph nodes using realtime sonoelastography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005 94 S1-S301
21. Sftoiu A, Vilmann P, Hassan H et al. Analysis of endoscopic ultrasound elastography used for characterisation and differentiation of benign and malignant lymph nodes. Ultraschall in Med 2006 27 535-542
22. Chiorean A R., Duma M M., Dudea S M. et al. Sonoelastographically guided preoperative localization of suspicious breast microcalcifications detected with mammography. Ultraschall in Med 2009 30 492-493
23. Thomas A, Fischer T, Frey H et al. Real-time elastography an advanced method of ultrasound: first results in 108 patients with breast lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006 28 335-340
24. Regner D M., Hesley G K., Hangiandreou N J. et al. Breast lesions: evaluation with US strain imaging clinical experience of multiple observers. Radiology 2006 238 425-437
25. Wojcinski S, Liberto A di, Cassel M et al. Menstrual-cycle dependence of breast parenchyma elasticity determined by realtime sonoelastography: finding the optimal time for examination. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005 94 S1-S301