How collaborative technology supports cognitive processes in collaborative process modeling: A capabilities-gains-outcome model

Information Systems

Volumn 38, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1031-1045

  Recker, Jan ^a   Mendling, Jan ^b   Hahn, Christopher ^c  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Austria)

^c TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Collaborative technology; Distributed modeling; Process modeling

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE PROCESS; COLLABORATION; COLLABORATIVE PROCESS; COLLABORATIVE TECHNOLOGIES; DISTRIBUTED MODELING; GROUP PROCESS; MODELING TASK; PROCESS MODELING;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

PROCESS ENGINEERING;

EID: 84878220414     PISSN: 03064379     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.is.2013.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. W. Bandara, G.G. Gable, and M. Rosemann Factors and measures of business process modelling: model building through a multiple case study European Journal of Information Systems 14 2005 347 360 (Pubitemid 41699769)
2. F. Belanger, and C.D. Allport Collaborative technologies in knowledge telework: an exploratory study Information Systems Journal 18 2008 101 121
3. A. Bhattacherjee Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model MIS Quarterly 25 2001 351 370 (Pubitemid 33738440)
4. P. Bjørn, and O. Ngwenyama Virtual team collaboration: building shared meaning, resolving breakdowns and creating translucence Information Systems Journal 19 2009 227 253
5. M.R.S. Borges, Pino, J.A.: PAWS: towards a participatory approach to business process reengineering, in: String Processing and Information Retrieval Symposium & International Workshop on Groupware. IEEE, Cancun, Mexico, 1999, pp. 262-269.
6. R.O. Briggs: The Team Theory of Group Productivity and its Application to the Development and Testing of Electronic Group Support Technology. University of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, 1994.
7. R.O. Briggs, G.-J. de Vreede, and J.F. Nunamaker Jr Collaboration engineering with thinklets to pursue sustained success with group support systems Journal of Management Information Systems 19 2003 31 64
8. R. Brown, J. Recker, and S. West Using virtual worlds for collaborative business process modeling Business Process Management Journal 17 2011 546 564
9. A. Burton-Jones, and P. Meso The effects of decomposition quality and multiple forms of information on novices' understanding of a domain from a conceptual model Journal of the Association for Information Systems 9 2008 784 802
10. J. Claes, I.T.P. Vanderfeesten, H.A. Reijers, J. Pinggera, M. Weidlich, S. Zugal, D. Fahland, B. Weber, J. Mendling, and G. Poels Tying process model quality to the modeling process: the impact of structuring, movement, and speed A.P. Barros, A. Gal, E Kindler, Business Process Management - BPM 2-12. Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 7481 2012 Springer Tallinn, Estonia 33 48
11. A. Clement Computing at work: empowering action by 'low-level users' Communications of the ACM 37 1994 52 63
12. F.D. Davis Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology MIS Quarterly 13 1989 319 340
13. G.-J. de Vreede, R.O. Briggs, and A. Massey Collaboration engineering: foundations and opportunities: editorial to the special issue on the Journal of the Association of Information Systems Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10 2009 121 137
14. D.L. Dean, J.D. Lee, R.E. Orwig, and D.R. Vogel Technological support for group process modeling Journal of Management Information Systems 11 2001 43 63
15. G. Decker, H. Overdick, and M. Weske Oryx - sharing conceptual models on the web Q. Li, S. Spaccapietra, E.S.K. Yu, A. Olivé, Conceptual Modeling - ER 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 5231 2008 Springer Barcelona, Spain 536 537
16. W.H. DeLone, and E.R. McLean The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update Journal of Management Information Systems 19 2003 9 30
17. M. den Hengst, Collaborative modeling of processes: what facilitation support does a group need? In: Romano, N.C. (ed.): Proceedings of the 11th Americas Conference on Information Systems. Association for Information Systems, Omaha, Nebrasca, 2005, pp. 73-80.
18. A.R. Dennis, G. Hayes, and R.M. Daniels Business process modeling with group support systems Journal of Management Information Systems 15 1999 115 142 (Pubitemid 32716607)
19. G. DeSanctis, and R.B. Gallupe A foundation for the study of group decision support systems Management Science 33 1987 589 609 (Pubitemid 17586367)
20. W.J. Doll, W. Xia, and G. Torkzadeh Confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument MIS Quarterly 18 1994 453 461
21. M. Dumas, M. La Rosa, J. Mendling, and H.A. Reijers Fundamentals of Business Process Management 2013 Springer Berlin, Germany
22. R.F. Easley, S. Devaraj, and J.M. Crant Relating collaborative technology use to teamwork quality and performance: an empirical analysis Journal of Management Information Systems 19 2003 247 268
23. J. Evermann, and M. Tate Fitting covariance models for theory generation Journal of the Association for Information Systems 12 2011 632 661
24. L. Fischer 2011 Future Strategies Inc Lighthouse Point, Florida
25. D.J. Flynn, and R. Warhurst An empirical study of the validation process within requirements determination Information Systems Journal 4 1994 185 212
26. P.J.M. Frederiks, and T.P. van der Weide Information modeling: the process and the required competencies of its participants Data & Knowledge Engineering 58 2006 4 20 (Pubitemid 44275066)
27. H.L. Fromkin, and S. Streufert Laboratory Experimentation 1976 Rand McNally College Publishing Company Chicago, Illinois
28. Gartner Group: Gartner Reveals Five Business Process Management Predictions for 2010 and Beyond. Gartner Group, 2010, available at: 〈http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1278415〉.
29. D. Gefen, D.W. Straub, and M.-C. Boudreau Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice Communications of the Association for Information Systems 4 2000
30. A. Gemino, and Y. Wand A framework for empirical evaluation of conceptual modeling techniques Requirements Engineering 9 2004 248 260 (Pubitemid 39660033)
31. A. Gemino, and Y. Wand Complexity and clarity in conceptual modeling: comparison of mandatory and optional properties Data & Knowledge Engineering 55 2005 301 326 (Pubitemid 41393722)
32. M. Genero, G. Poels, and M. Piattini Defining and validating metrics for assessing the understandability of entity-relationship diagrams Data & Knowledge Engineering 64 2008 534 557 (Pubitemid 351173978)
33. C. Hahn, J. Recker, and J. Mendling An exploratory study of it-enabled collaborative process modeling M. zur Muehlen, J. Su, Business Process Management Workshops: BPM 2010 International Workshops. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing 2011 Springer Hoboken, New Jersey 61 72
34. G.W. Hill Group versus individual performance: are n+1 heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin 91 1982 517 539
35. K.S. Im, and V. Grover The use of structural equation modeling in is research: review and recommendations M.E. Whitman, A.B. Woszczynski, The Handbook of Information Systems Research 2004 Idea Group Hershey, Pennsylvania 44 65
36. M. Indulska, J. Recker, M. Rosemann, and P. Green Process modeling: current issues and future challenges P. van Eck, J. Gordijn, R. Wieringa, Advanced Information Systems Engineering - CAiSE 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 5565 2009 Amsterdam, The Netherlands Springer 501 514
37. J.E. Ingvaldsen, and J.A. Gulla Model-based business process mining Information Systems Management 23 2006 19 31 (Pubitemid 43017285)
38. K.G. Jöreskog, and D. Sörbom LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide 2001 Scientific Software International Lincolnwood, Illinois
39. V. Khatri, I. Vessey, V. Ramesh, P. Clay, and P. Sung-Jin Understanding conceptual schemas: exploring the role of application and is domain knowledge Information Systems Research 17 2006 81 99 (Pubitemid 43450180)
40. A. Koschmider, M. Song, and H.A. Reijers Social software for business process modeling Journal of Information Technology 25 2010 308 322
41. J. Krogstie, G. Sindre, and H.D. Jørgensen Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework European Journal of Information Systems 15 2006 91 102 (Pubitemid 43323397)
42. H. Lamm, and G. Trommsdorff Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideation proficiency (brainstorming): a review European Journal of Social Psychology 3 1974 361 388
43. A. Maes, and G. Poels Evaluating quality of conceptual modelling scripts based on user perceptions Data & Knowledge Engineering 63 2007 769 792 (Pubitemid 47418338)
44. A.M. Magdaleno, C. Cappelli, F.A. Baião, F.M. Santoro, and R. Araujo Towards collaboration maturity in business processes: an exploratory study in oil production processes Information Systems Management 25 2008 302 318
45. J. Mendling, J. Recker, and J. Wolf Collaboration features in current BPM tools EMISA Forum 32 2012 48 65
46. J. Mendling, H.A. Reijers, and J. Recker Activity labeling in process modeling: empirical insights and recommendations Information Systems 35 2010 467 482
47. J.T. Nosek, and M. McManus Collaboration challenges: bridging the IT support gap Information Systems Management 25 2005 3 7
48. J.F. Nunamaker Jr, R.O. Briggs, D.D. Mittleman, D.R. Vogel, and P.A. Balthazard Lessons from a dozen years of group support systems research: a discussion of lab and field findings Journal of Management Information Systems 13 1996 163 207
49. J.F. Nunamaker Jr, A.R. Dennis, J.S. Valacich, D.R. Vogel, and J.F. George Electronic meeting systems to support group work Communications of the ACM 34 1991 40 61
50. V.L. Patel, V.G. Allen, J.F. Arocha, and E.H. Shortliffe Representing clinical guidelines in GLIF: individual and collaborative expertise Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 5 2004 467 483
51. G. Poels, A. Maes, F. Gailly, and R. Paemeleire The pragmatic quality of resources-events-agents diagrams: an experimental evaluation Information Systems Journal 21 2011 63 89
52. G. Premkumar, and A. Bhattacherjee Explaining information systems usage: a test of competing models Omega 36 2008 64 75
53. J. Recker Continued use of process modeling grammars: the impact of individual difference factors European Journal of Information Systems 19 2010 76 92
54. J. Recker Opportunities and constraints: the current struggle with BPMN Business Process Management Journal 16 2010 181 201
55. J. Recker Modeling with tools is easier, believe me - the effects of tool functionality on modeling grammar usage beliefs Information Systems 37 2012 213 226
56. J. Recker, and A. Dreiling The effects of content presentation format and user characteristics on novice developers' understanding of process models Communications of the Association for Information Systems 28 2011 65 84
57. J. Recker, and M. Rosemann A measurement instrument for process modeling research: development, test and procedural model Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 22 2010 3 30
58. P. Rittgen Negotiating models J. Krogstie, A.L. Opdahl, G. Sindre, Advanced Information Systems Engineering - CAiSE 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 4495 2007 Springer Trondheim, Norway 561 573
59. P. Rittgen IT support in collaborative modelling of business processes - a comparative experiment International Journal of Organisational Design and Engineering 1 2010 98 108
60. K. Ryu, and E. Yücesan CPM: a collaborative process modeling for cooperative manufacturers Advanced Engineering Informatics 21 2007 231 239 (Pubitemid 46771353)
61. F.M., Santoro, M.R.S., Borges, J.A. Pino,: CEPE: cooperative editor for processes elicitation In: 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, Maui, Hawaii, 2000, pp. 1-10.
62. A.-W. Scheer ARIS toolset: a software product is born Information Systems 19 1994 607 624 (Pubitemid 124012593)
63. M.E. Shaw Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior 1981 McGraw Hill, New York New York
64. R.A. Spreng, S.B. MacKenzie, and R.W. Olshavsky A reexamination of the determinants of consumer satisfaction Journal of Marketing 60 1996 15 32
65. V.E. van Reijswoud, H.B.F. Mulder, and J.L.G. Dietz Communicative action-based business process and information systems modelling with DEMO Information Systems Journal 9 1999 117 138
66. V. Venkatesh, M.G. Morris, G.B. Davis, and F.D. Davis User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view MIS Quarterly 27 2003 425 478
67. Y. Wand, and R. Weber Research commentary: information systems and conceptual modeling - a research agenda Information Systems Research 13 2002 363 376 (Pubitemid 36039702)
68. S.A., White, D. Miers,: BPMN Modeling and Reference Guide. Lighthouse Point, Florida, Future Strategies, 2008.