Business process modeling: Current issues and future challenges

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5565 LNCS, Issue , 2009, Pages 501-514

  Indulska, Marta ^a   Recker, Jan ^b   Rosemann, Michael ^b   Green, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Business process modeling; Challenges; Delphi study; Issues

Indexed keywords

ANECDOTAL EVIDENCES; BUSINESS PROCESS MODELING; CHALLENGES; CRITICAL AREA; DELPHI STUDY; FUTURE CHALLENGES; ISSUES; MODEL-DRIVEN; MODELING APPROACH; PROCESS EXECUTION; RESEARCH COMMUNITIES; STAKEHOLDER GROUPS; VALUE PROPOSITION; WELL-ALIGNED;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

RESEARCH;

EID: 69849109062     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02144-2_39     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Davies, I., Green, P., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., Gallo, S.: How do Practitioners Use Conceptual Modeling in Practice? Data & Knowledge Engineering 58, 358-380 (2006)
2. Dumas, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M. (eds.): Process Aware Information Systems: Bridging People and Software Through Process Technology. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey (2005)
3. Davenport, T.H., Short, J.E.: The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign. Sloan Management Review 31, 11-27 (1990)
4. Erl, T.: Service-oriented Architecture: Concepts, Technology, and Design. Prentice Hall, Upple Saddle River (2005)
5. Scheer, A.-W.: ARIS - Business Process Modeling, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin (2000)
6. Eikebrokk, T.R., Iden, J., Olsen, D.H., Opdahl, A.L.: Exploring Process-Modelling Practice: Towards a Conceptual Model. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol.376. IEEE, Waikoloa (2008)
7. Dalkey, N., Helmer, O.: An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts. Management Science 9, 458-467 (1963)
8. Murphy, M.K., Black, N.A., Lamping, D.L., McKee, C.M., Sanderson, C.F.B., Askham, J., Marteau, T.: Consensus Development Methods, and their Use in Clinical Guideline Development. Health Technology Assessment 2, 1-88 (1998)
9. van de Ven, A.H., Delbecq, A.L.: The Effectiveness of Nominal, Delphi, and Interacting Group Decision Making Processes. Academy of Management Journal 17, 605-621 (1974)
10. Okoli, C., Pawlowski, S.D.: The Delphi Method as a Research Tool: an Example, Design Considerations and Applications. Information & Management 42, 15-29 (2004)
11. Powell, C.: The Delphi Technique: Myths and Realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing 41, 376-382 (2003)
12. Richards, J.I., Curran, C.M.: Oracles on "Advertising": Searching for a Definition. Journal of Advertising 31, 63-76 (2002)
13. Hall, C., Harmon, P.: The 2007 Enterprise Architecture. Process Modeling, and Simulation Tools Report. BPTrends.com (2007)
14. Blechar, M.J.: Magic Quadrant for Business Process Analysis Tools. Gartner Research Note G00148777. Gartner, Inc., Stamford, Connecticut (2007)
15. Cochran, S.W.: The Delphi Method: Formulation and Refining Group Judgments. Journal of Human Sciences 2, 111-117 (1983)
16. Linstone, H.A., Turoff, M. (eds.): The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications [Online Reproduction from 1975]. Addison-Wesley, London (2002)
17. de Bruin, T., Rosemann, M.: Using the Delphi Technique to Identify BPM Capability Areas. In: Toleman, M., Cater-Steel, A., Roberts, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, The University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia, pp. 643-653 (2007)
18. de Bruin, T.: Insights into the Evolution of BPM in Organisations. In: Toleman, M., Cater-Steel, A., Roberts, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, The University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia, pp. 632-642 (2007)
19. Cohen, J.: A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 37-46 (1960)
20. Landis, J.R., Koch, G.G.: The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics 33, 159-174 (1977)
21. Recker, J.: Opportunities and Constraints: The Current Struggle with BPMN. Business Process Management Journal 15 (in press, 2009)
22. Ouyang, C., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Mendling, J.: From Business Process Models to Process-Oriented Software Systems. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering Methodology 19 (in press, 2009)
23. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D., Morris, M.G.: Dead Or Alive? The Development, Trajectory And Future Of Technology Adoption Research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8, 267-286 (2007)
24. Bhattacherjee, A.: Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS Quarterly 25, 351-370 (2001)
25. Mukhopadhyay, T., Kekre, S., Kalathur, S.: Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of Electronic Data Interchange. MIS Quarterly 19, 137-156 (1995)
26. Recker, J.: Understanding Process Modelling Grammar Continuance: A Study of the Consequences of Representational Capabilities. Faculty of Information Technology, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane (2008)
27. Ono, R., Wedemeyer, D.J.: Assessing the Validity of the Delphi Technique. Futures 26, 289-304 (1994)