Performance predictions affect attentional processes of event-based prospective memory

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 729-741

  Rummel, Jan ^a   Kuhlmann, Beatrice G ^b,c   Touron, Dayna R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

^c HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Metamemory; Performance predictions; Prospective memory; Reactive effects

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MEMORY; METAMEMORY; PREDICTION; PROSPECTIVE MEMORY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 84878161869     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.012     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Albinski R., Sedek G., Kliegel M. Differences in target monitoring in a prospective memory task. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2012, 24:916-928.
2. Balota D.A., Yap M.J., Cortese M.J., Hutchison K.A., Kessler B., Loftis B., et al. The English lexicon project. Behavioral Research Methods 2007, 39:445-459.
3. Boywitt C.D., Rummel J. A diffusion model analysis of task interference effects in prospective memory. Memory & Cognition 2012, 40:19-27.
4. Brewer G.A., Knight J., Meeks J.T., Marsh R.L. On the role of imagery in event-based prospective memory. Consciousness and Cognition 2011, 20:901-907.
5. Brewer G.A., Marsh R.L. On the role of episodic future simulation in encoding of prospective memories. Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 1:81-88.
6. Chambers J.R., Windschitl P.D. Biases in social comparative judgments: The role of nonmotivated factors in above-average and comparative-optimism effects. Psychological Bulletin 2004, 130:813-838.
7. Devolder P.A., Brigham M.C., Pressley M. Memory performance awareness in younger and older adults. Psychology & Aging 1990, 5:291-303.
8. Einstein G.O., McDaniel M.A. Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1990, 16:717-726.
9. Einstein G.O., McDaniel M.A. Prospective memory: Multiple retrieval processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2005, 14:286-290.
10. Einstein G.O., McDaniel M.A. Prospective memory and metamemory: The skilled use of basic attentional and memory processes. The psychology of learning and motivation 2008, Vol. 48:145-173. Elsevier, San Diego.
11. Einstein G.O., McDaniel M.A. Prospective memory and what costs do not reveal about retrieval processes: A commentary on Smith, Hunt, McVay, and McConnell (2007). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 2010, 36:1082-1088.
12. Einstein G.O., McDaniel M.A., Thomas R., Mayfield S., Shank H., Morrisette N., et al. Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2005, 134:327-342.
13. Faul F., Erdfelder E., Lang A.-G., Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods 2007, 39:175-191.
14. Hager W., Hasselhorn M. Handbuch deutschsprachiger Wortnormen 1993, Hogrefe, Göttingen.
15. Hertzog C., Hultsch D.F. Metacognition in adulthood and old age. The handbook of aging and cognition 2000, Vol. 2:417-466. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ, US.
16. Hertzog C., Touron D.R., Hines J.C. Does a time-monitoring deficit influence older adults' delayed retrieval shift during skill acquisition?. Psychology and Aging 2007, 22:607-624.
17. Hicks J.L., Marsh R.L., Cook G.I. Task interference in time-based, event-based, and dual intention prospective memory conditions. Journal of Memory and Language 2005, 53:430-444.
18. Horn S.S., Bayen U.J., Smith R.E. What can the diffusion model tell us about prospective memory?. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2011, 65:69-75.
19. Kelemen W.L., Weaver C.A. Enhanced metamemory at delays: Why do judgments of learning improve over time?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1997, 23:1394-1409.
20. Kliegel M., Jäger T., Phillips L.H. Adult age differences in event-based prospective memory: A meta-analysis on the role of focal versus nonfocal cues. Psychology and Aging 2008, 23:203-208.
21. Knight R.G., Harnett M., Titov N. The effects of traumatic brain injury on the predicted and actual performance of a test of prospective remembering. Brain Injury 2005, 19:19-27.
22. Kuhlmann B.G., Touron D.R. Older adults' use of metacognitive knowledge in source monitoring: Spared monitoring but impaired control. Psychology and Aging 2011, 26:143-149.
23. Loft S., Yeo G. An investigation into the resource requirements of event-based prospective memory. Memory & Cognition 2007, 35:263-274.
24. Marsh R.L., Hancock T.W., Hicks J.L. The demands of an ongoing activity influence the success of event-based prospective memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002, 9:604-610.
25. Marsh R.L., Hicks J.L., Cook G.I. On the relationship between effort toward an ongoing task and cue detection in event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:68-75.
26. Marsh R.L., Hicks J.L., Cook G.I., Hansen J.S., Pallos A.L. Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:861-870.
27. Marsh R.L., Hicks J.L., Hancock T.W. On the interaction of ongoing cognitive activity and the nature of an event-based intention. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2000, 14:29-41.
28. Maylor E.A. Age-related impairment in an event-based prospective-memory task. Psychology and Aging 1996, 11:74-78.
29. McBride D.M., Abney D.H. A comparison of transfer-appropriate and multi-process frameworks for prospective memory performance. Experimental Psychology 2012, 59:190-198.
30. McDaniel M.A., Einstein G.O. Prospective memory: An overview and synthesis of an emerging field 2007, Sage, Los Angeles.
31. McFarland C.P., Glisky E.L. Implementation intentions and imagery: Individual and combined effects on prospective memory among younger adults. Memory & Cognition 2012, 40:62-69.
32. Meeks J.T., Hicks J.L., Marsh R.L. Metacognitive awareness of event-based prospective memory. Consciousness and Cognition 2007, 16:997-1004.
33. Meier B., Graf P. Transfer appropriate processing for prospective memory test. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2000, 14:11-27.
34. Meier B., von Wartburg P., Matter S., Rothen N., Reber R. Performance predictions improve prospective memory and influence retrieval experience. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2011, 65:12-18.
35. Meiser T., Rummel J. False prospective memory responses as indications of automatic processes in the initiation of delayed intentions. Consciousness & Cognition 2012, 21:1509-1516.
36. Meiser T., Schult J.C. On the automatic nature of the task-appropriate processing effect in event-based prospective memory. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2008, 20:290-311.
37. Nelson T.O., Dunlosky J. When people's judgments of learning (Jols) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall - The delayed-Jol effect. Psychological Science 1991, 2:267-270.
38. Ratcliff R. Theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review 1978, 85:59-108.
39. Ratcliff R., Gomez P., McKoon G. A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Psychological Review 2004, 111:159-182.
40. Rosenthal R., Rosnow R. Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance 1985, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
41. Rummel J., Einstein G.O., Rampey H. Implementation intention encoding in a prospective memory task enhances spontaneous retrieval of intentions. Memory 2012, 20:803-817.
42. Rummel, J., & Meiser, T. (submitted for publication). The role of metacognition in prospective memory: Anticipated task demands influence attention allocation strategies.
43. Schnitzspahn K.M., Zeintl M., Jäger T., Kliegel M. Metacognition in prospective memory: Are performance predictions accurate?. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2011, 65:19-26.
44. Scullin M.K., Einstein G.O., McDaniel M.A. Evidence for spontaneous retrieval of suspended but not finished prospective memories. Memory & Cognition 2009, 37:425-433.
45. Scullin M.K., McDaniel M.A., Einstein G.O. Control of cost in prospective memory: Evidence for spontaneous retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2010, 36:190-203.
46. Scullin M.K., McDaniel M.A., Shelton J.T., Lee J.H. Focal/nonfocal cue effects in prospective memory: Monitoring difficulty or different retrieval processes?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2010, 36:736-749.
47. Smith R.E. The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:347-361.
48. Smith R.E. What costs do reveal and moving beyond the cost debate: Reply to Einstein and McDaniel (2010). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2010, 36:1089-1095.
49. Smith R.E., Bayen U.J. A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2004, 30:756-777.
50. Smith R.E., Hunt R.R., McVay J.C., McConnell M.D. The cost of event-based prospective memory: Salient target events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:734-746.
51. Spellman B.A., Bjork R.A. When predictions create reality: Judgments of learning may alter what they are intended to assess. Psychological Science 1992, 3:315-316.
52. Uttl B. Measurement of individual differences: Lessons from memory assessment in research and clinical practice. Psychological Science 2005, 16:460-467.
53. Uttl B., Kibreab M. Self-report measures of prospective memory are reliable but not valid. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2011, 65:57-68.
54. Voss A., Voss J. Fast-dm: A free program for efficient diffusion model analysis. Behavior Research Methods 2007, 39:767-775.
55. Voss A., Voss J. A fast numerical algorithm for the estimation of diffusion model parameters. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2008, 52:1-9.
56. Voss A., Voss J., Klauer K.C. Separating response-execution bias from decision bias: Arguments for an additional parameter in Ratcliff's diffusion model. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology 2010, 63:539-555.
57. Wagenmakers E.J., Ratcliff R., Gomez P., McKoon G. A diffusion model account of criterion shifts in the lexical decision task. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 58:140-159.