Large-scale patterns in genetic variation, gene flow and differentiation in five species of European Coenagrionid damselfly provide mixed support for the central-marginal hypothesis

Ecography

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 744-755

  Johansson, Helena ^a,b   Stoks, Robby ^d   Nilsson Örtman, Viktor ^b   Ingvarsson, Pär K ^a   Johansson, Frank ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLONIZATION; DAMSELFLY; ENTOMOLOGY; GENE FLOW; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION;

COENAGRION MERCURIALE; COENAGRIONIDAE; ZYGOPTERA;

EID: 84878158275     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.00064.x     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Askew D. 2004. The dragonflies or Europe. - Harley Books.
2. Bridle J. R. and Vines T. H. 2006. Limits to evolution at range margins: when and why does adaptation fail? Trend Ecol. Evol. 22: 141-147.
3. Brussard P. F. 1984. Geographic patterns and environmental gradients: the central-marginal model in Drosophila revisited. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 25-64.
4. Conrad K. F. et al. 1999. Dispersal characteristics of seven odonate species in an agricultural landscape. Ecography 22: 524-531.
5. Corbet P. S. et al. 2006. Voltinism of Odonata: a review. Int. J. Odonantol. 9: 1-44.
6. De Knijf G. et al. 2001. Trends in dragonfly occurrence in Belgium (Odonata). Proceedings of the 13th International Colloquium of the European Invertebrate Survey. European Invertebrate Survey, Netherlands.
7. Dijkstra K.-D. 2006. Fieldguide to the dragonflies of Britain and Europe. - British Wildlife Publishing.
8. Eckert C. G. et al. 2008. Genetic variation across species' geographical ranges: the central-marginal hypothesis and beyond. Mol. Ecol. 17: 1170-1188.
9. Eckstein R. L. et al. 2006. Genetic structure among and within peripheral and central populations of three endangered floodplain violets. Mol. Ecol. 15: 2367-2379.
10. Evanno G. et al. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software Structure: a simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 14: 2611-2620.
11. Faubet P. and Gaggiotti O. 2008. A new Bayesian method to identify the environmental factors that influence recent migration. Genetics 178: 1491-1504.
12. Fedorka K. M. et al. 2012. The role of gene flow asymmetry along an environmental gradient in constraining local adaptation and range expansion. J. Evol. Biol. 25: 1676-1685.
13. Fisher R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. - Clarendon Press.
14. Foll M. and Gaggiotti O. 2006. Identifying the environmental factors that determine the genetic structure of populations. Genetics 174: 875-891.
15. Freeland J. R. and Conrad K. F. 2002. Genetic similarity within and among populations of the variable and azure damselflies (Coenagrion pulchellum and C. puella).- Hydrobiologia 479: 69-73.
16. Gaggiotti O. E. et al. 2009. Disentangling the effects of evolutionary, demographic, and environmental factors influencing genetic structure of natural populations: Atlantic herring as a case study. Evolution 63: 2939-2951.
17. Gerlach G. et al. 2010. Calculations of population differentiation based on Gst and D: forget Gst but not all of statistics! - Mol. Ecol. 19: 3845-3852.
18. Goudet J. 1995. Fstat version 1.2: a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J. Hered. 86: 485-486.
19. Hairston N. G. and De Stasio B. T. 1988. Rate of evolution slowed by a dormant propagule pool. Nature 336: 239-242.
20. Hampe A. and Petit R. J. 2005. Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. Ecol. Lett. 8: 457-461.
21. Hassall C. et al. 2008. Latitudinal variation in morphology in two sympatric damselfly species with contrasting range dynamics (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Eur. J. Entomol. 105: 939-944.
22. Hengeveld R. and Haeck J. 1982. The distribution of abundance. 1 Measurements. J. Biogeogr. 9: 303-316.
23. Hickling R. et al. 2005. A northwards shift of range margins in British Odonata. Global Change Biol. 11: 502-506.
24. Hoffmann A. A. and Blows M. W. 1994. Species borders; ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 223-227.
25. Honkanen M. et al. 2011. Deconstructing responses of dragonfly species richness to area, nutrients, water plant diversity and forestry. Oecologia 166: 457-467.
26. Johansson H. et al. 2012. Cross-species amplification and development of microsatellites for six species of European Coenagrionid damselflies. Conserv. Genet. Res. 4: 191-196.
27. Jost L. 2008 Gst and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol. Ecol. 18: 4015-4026.
28. Jump A. S. et al. 2003. Cirsium species show disparity in patterns of genetic variation at their range-edge, despite similar patterns of reproduction and isolation. New Phytol. 160: 359-370.
29. Kark S. et al. 2008. How does genetic diversity change towards the range periphery? An empirical and theoretical test. Evol. Ecol. Res. 10: 391-414.
30. Kemp M. U. et al. 2010. Can wind help explain seasonal differences in avian migration speed? J. Avian Biol. 41: 672-677.
31. Lawton J. H. 1993. Range, population abundance and conser vation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 409-413.
32. Levy E. et al. 2010. Land clearing reduces gene flow in the granite outcrop-dwelling lizard, Ctenophorus ornatus.- Mol. Ecol. 19: 4192-4203.
33. Lowe C. D. et al. 2007. Variable microsatellite loci isolated from the azure damselfly, Coenagrion puella L. (Zygoptera; Coenagrionidae). Mol. Ecol. Not. 7: 880-882.
34. Lundemo S. et al. 2009. Seed banks cause elevated generation times and effective population sizes of Arabidopsis thaliana in northern Europe. Mol. Ecol. 18: 2798-2811.
35. Mayr E. 1965. Animal species and evolution. - Belknap Press.
36. Mayr E. 1970. Populations, species, and evolution. - Belknap Press.
37. Nilsson-Örtman V. et al. 2012. Generalists and specialists along a latitudinal transect: patterns of thermal adaptation in six species of damselflies. Ecology 93: 1340-1352.
38. Norling U. 1984a. The life cycle and larval photoperiodic res ponses of Coenagrion hastulatum (Charpentier) in two climatically different areas (Zygoptera: Coengrionidae). Odonatologica 13: 429-449.
39. Norling U. 1984b. Life history patterns in the northern expansion of dragonflies. Adv. Odonatol. 2: 127-156.
40. Parmesan C. et al. 2005. Empirical perspectives on species borders: from traditional biogeography to global change. Oikos. 108: 58-75.
41. Pritchard J. K. et al. 2000. Inference of population structure from multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
42. Ramakrishnan A. P. et al. 2010. Shifting dispersal modes at an expanding species' range margin. Mol. Ecol. 19: 1134-1146.
43. Rouquette J. R. and Thompson D. J. 2004. Habitat associations of the endangered damselfly, Coenagrion mercuriale, in a water meadow ditch system in southern England. Biol. Conserv. 123: 255-235.
44. Rouquette J. R. and Thompson D. J. 2007. Patters of movement and dispersal in an endangered damselfly and the consequences for its management. J. Appl. Ecol. 44: 692-701.
45. Ryman N. and Leimar O. 2009. GST is still a useful measure of genetic differentiation - a comment on Jost's D. Mol. Ecol. 18: 2084-2087.
46. Sagarin R. D. and Gaines S. D. 2002. The 'abundant centre' distribution: to what extent is it a biogeographical rule? Ecol. Lett. 5: 137-147.
47. Sagarin R. D. et al. 2006. Moving beyond assumptions to understand abundance distributions across the range of species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21: 524-530.
48. Sahlen G. et al. 2004. Critical species of Odonata in Europe. Int. J. Odonatol. 7: 385-398.
49. Schmitt T. 2007. Molecular biogeography of Europe: Pleistocene cycles and postglacial trends. Front. Zool. 4: 1-13.
50. Schneider S. et al. 2000. Arlequin: a software for population genetics data analysis. Version 3.01. - Genetics and Biometry Lab, Dept of Anthropology, Univ. of Geneva, Switzerland.
51. Sexton J. P. et al. 2009. Evolution and ecology of species range limits. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40: 415-436.
52. Shama L. N. S. et al. 2011. Latitudinal and voltinism compen sation shape thermal reaction norms for growth rate. Mol. Ecol. 20: 2929-2941.
53. Watts P. C. and Thompson D. J. 2012. Developmental plasticity as a cohesive evolutionary process between sympatric alternate-year insect cohorts. Heredity 108: 236-241.
54. Watts P. C. et al. 2004a. A panel of microsatellite loci for the southern damselfly, Coenagrion mercuriale (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Conserv. Genet. 8: 117-119.
55. Watts P. C. et al. 2004b. Molecular and ecological evidence for small-scale isolation by distance in an endangered damselfly, Coenagrion mercuriale.- Mol. Ecol. 13: 2931-2945.
56. Watts P. C. et al. 2010. Patterns of spatial genetic structure and diversity at the onset of a rapid range expansion: colonization of the UK by the small red-eyed damselfly Erythromma viridulum.- Biol. Invasions 12: 3887-3903.
57. Wellenreuther M. et al. 2011. Environmental and climatic determinants of molecular diversity and genetic population structure in a Coenagrionid damselfly. PLoS One 6: e20440.