Impact of limited cognitive capacity and feelings of guilt and excuse on the endowment effects for hedonic and utilitarian types of foods

Appetite

Volumn 68, Issue , 2013, Pages 51-55

  Antonides, Gerrit ^a   Cramer, Leonie ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Anticipated feelings; Cognitive constraint; Endowment effect; Food products

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANTICIPATION; ARTICLE; AVERSION; COGNITION; EMOTION; ENDOWMENT EFFECT; FOOD ANALYSIS; FOOD INTAKE; GUILTY; HIGH SCHOOL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; AFFECT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; ETHICAL THEORY; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCES; GUILT; HUMANS; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PLEASURE; SCHOOLS;

EID: 84878147278     PISSN: 01956663     EISSN: 10958304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.04.020     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Batra R., Ahtola O.T. Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing Letters 1990, 2:159-170.
2. Baumgartner H., Pieters R., Bagozzi R.P. Future-oriented emotions. Conceptualization and behavioral effects. European Journal of Social Psychology 2008, 38(4):685-696.
3. Boon B., Stroebe W., Schut H., Ijntema R. Ironic processes in the eating behaviour of restrained eaters. British Journal of Health Psychology 2002, 7:1-10.
4. Cramer L., Antonides G. Endowment effects for hedonic and utilitarian food products. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22:3-10.
5. Cramer K.M., Perreault L.A. Effects of predictability, actual controllability, and awareness of choice on perceptions of control. Current Research in Social Psychology 2006, 11:111-126.
6. De Groot I.M., Antonides G., Read D., Van Raaij W.F. The effect of direct experience on consumer product evaluation. Journal of Socio-Economics 2009, 38:518-519.
7. Dhar R., Wertenbroch K. Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research 2000, 37:60-71.
8. Gilbert D.T., Giesler R.B., Morris K.A. When comparisons arise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1995, 69:227-236.
9. Gilbert D.T., Hixon J.G. The trouble of thinking. Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1991, 60:509-517.
10. Gilbert D.T., Osborne R.E. Thinking backward. Some curable and incurable consequences of cognitive busyness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989, 57:940-949.
11. Higgs S., Woodward M. Television watching during lunch increases afternoon snack intake of young women. Appetite 2009, 52:39-43.
12. Hinson J.M., Jameson T.L., Whitney P. Impulsive decision making and working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:298-306.
13. Hirschman E.C., Holbrook M.B. Hedonic consumption. Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing 1982, 46:92-101.
14. Hoek J., Gendall P. Advertising and obesity. A behavioral perspective. Journal of Health Communication 2006, 11:409-423.
15. Horowitz J.K., McConnell K.E. A review of WTA/WTP studies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2002, 44:426-447.
16. Kahneman D. Maps of bounded rationality. Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review 2003, 93(5):1449-1475.
17. Kahneman D. Thinking fast and slow 2011, Farrar, Straus & Giroux, New York.
18. Kahneman D., Knetsch J.L., Thaler R.H. Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy 1990, 98(6):1325-1348.
19. Kahneman D., Knetsch J.L., Thaler R.H. Anomalies. The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status-quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1991, 5:193-206.
20. Knetsch J.L. Asymmetric valuation of gains and losses and preference order assumptions. Economic Inquiry 1995, 33:134-141.
21. Knetsch J.L. Environmental valuations and standard theory. Behavioural findings, context dependence and implications. The international yearbook of environmental and resource economics 2000/2001. A survey of current issues 2000, 267-299. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK. T. Tietenberg, H. Folmer (Eds.).
22. Knetsch J.L., Wong W.-K. The endowment effect and the reference state. Evidence and manipulations. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 2009, 71:407-413.
23. Mellers B.A., McGraw A.P. Anticipated emotions as guides to choice. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2001, 6:210-214.
24. Nelissen R.M.A., De Vet E.E., Zeelenberg M.M. Anticipated emotions and effort allocation in weight goal striving. British Journal of Health Psychology 2011, 16(1):201-212.
25. Okada E.M. Justification effects on consumer choice of hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research 2005, 42:43-53.
26. Plott C.R., Zeiler K. Exchange asymmetries incorrectly interpreted as evidence of endowment effect theory and prospect theory?. American Economic Review 2007, 97(4):1449-1466.
27. Poothullil J.M. Role of oral sensory signals in determining meal size in lean women. Nutrition 2002, 18:479-483.
28. Schoorman F.D., Holahan P.J. Psychological antecedents of escalation behavior. Effects of choice, responsibility, and decision consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology 1996, 81:786-794.
29. Seiders K., Petty R.D. Obesity and the role of food marketing. A policy analysis of issues and remedies. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 2004, 23:153-169.
30. Shiv B., Fedorikhin A. Heart and mind in conflict. The interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research 1999, 26:278-292.
31. Shiv B., Fedorikhin A. Spontaneous versus controlled influences of stimulus-based affect on choice behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2002, 87:342-370.
32. Strahilevitz M., Myers J.G. Donations to charity as purchase intentions. How well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of Consumer Research 1998, 24:443-446.
33. Wansink B., Sobal J. Mindless eating. The 200 daily food decisions we overlook. Environment and Behavior 2007, 39:106-123.
34. Wertenbroch K. Consumption self-control by rationing purchase quantities of virtue and vice. Marketing Science 1998, 17(Fall):317-337.
35. Wittman D. Is status quo bias consistent with downward sloping demand?. Economic Inquiry 2008, 46(2):283-288.
36. Zhang L., Rashad I. Obesity and time preference. The health consequences of discounting the future. Journal of Biosocial Science 2008, 40:97-113.