Heading off with the herd: How cancer cells might maneuver supernumerary centrosomes for directional migration

Cancer and Metastasis Reviews

Volumn 32, Issue 1-2, 2013, Pages 269-287

  Ogden, Angela ^a   Rida, Padmashree C G ^a   Aneja, Ritu ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Carcinogenesis; Centrosomes; Clustering; Metastasis; Migration

Indexed keywords

AURORA A KINASE; GELATINASE B; INTERSTITIAL COLLAGENASE; MYOSIN ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; PROTEIN CDC42; PROTEIN P53; RAC1 PROTEIN; RHO GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN; RHO KINASE; VASCULOTROPIN;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ANEUPLOIDY; BASEMENT MEMBRANE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CELL; CANCER GROWTH; CARCINOGENESIS; CELL EXPANSION; CELL GROWTH; CELL INTERACTION; CELL INVASION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL POLARITY; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL SURVIVAL; CENTROSOME; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CIRCULATING TUMOR CELL; CYTOSKELETON; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME RELEASE; EPITHELIAL MESENCHYMAL TRANSITION; GOLGI COMPLEX; HUMAN; INTERPHASE; KARYOTYPING; LAMELLIPODIUM; MALIGNANT TRANSFORMATION; METASTASIS; MICROTUBULE; MICROTUBULE ORGANIZING CENTER; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; POLARIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROTEIN PROCESSING; REVIEW; SPINDLE CELL; TUMOR ASSOCIATED LEUKOCYTE; TUMOR INVASION; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT;

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL POLARITY; CELL TRANSFORMATION, NEOPLASTIC; CENTROSOME; GOLGI APPARATUS; HUMANS; MITOSIS; NEOPLASM METASTASIS; NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84878107475     PISSN: 01677659     EISSN: 15737233     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10555-012-9413-5     Document Type: Review

References (122)

1. D'Assoro, A. B., Lingle, W. L., & Salisbury, J. L. (2002). Centrosome amplification and the development of cancer. Oncogene, 21(40), 6146-53.
2. Lingle, W. L., & Salisbury, J. L. (1999). Altered centrosome structure is associated with abnormal mitoses in human breast tumors. Am J Pathol, 155(6), 1941-51.
3. Chan, J. Y. (2011). A clinical overview of centrosome amplification in human cancers. Int J Biol Sci, 7(8), 1122-44.
4. Prigozhina, N. L., & Waterman-Storer, C. M. (2006). Decreased polarity and increased random motility in PtK1 epithelial cells correlate with inhibition of endosomal recycling. J Cell Sci, 119(Pt 17), 3571-82.
5. Basto, R., et al. (2008). Centrosome amplification can initiate tumorigenesis in flies. Cell, 133(6), 1032-42.
6. Bornens, M. (2008). Organelle positioning and cell polarity. Nature Reviews. Molecular cell biology, 9(11), 874-86.
7. de Forges, H., Bouissou, A., & Perez, F. (2012). Interplay between microtubule dynamics and intracellular organization. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, 44(2), 266-74.
8. Vinogradova, T., Miller, P. M., & Kaverina, I. (2009). Microtubule network asymmetry in motile cells: role of Golgi-derived array. Cell Cycle, 8(14), 2168-74.
9. Verhey, K. J., & Hammond, J. W. (2009). Traffic control: regulation of kinesin motors. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology, 10(11), 765-77.
10. Siegrist, S. E., & Doe, C. Q. (2007). Microtubule-induced cortical cell polarity. Genes & Development, 21(5), 483-96.
11. Luxton, G. W., & Gundersen, G. G. (2011). Orientation and function of the nuclear-centrosomal axis during cell migration. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 23(5), 579-88.
12. Quinones, G. B., et al. (2011). The posttranslational modification of tubulin undergoes a switch from detyrosination to acetylation as epithelial cells become polarized. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 22(7), 1045-57.
13. Silkworth, W. T., et al. (2009). Multipolar spindle pole coalescence is a major source of kinetochore mis-attachment and chromosome mis-segregation in cancer cells. PloS One, 4(8), e6564.
14. Ganem, N. J., Godinho, S. A., & Pellman, D. (2009). A mechanism linking extra centrosomes to chromosomal instability. Nature, 460(7252), 278-82.
15. Baccelli, I., & Trumpp, A. (2012). The evolving concept of cancer and metastasis stem cells. J Cell Biol, 198(3), 281-93.
16. Lingle, W. L., et al. (2002). Centrosome amplification drives chromosomal instability in breast tumor development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(4), 1978-83.
17. Lingle, W. L., et al. (1998). Centrosome hypertrophy in human breast tumors: implications for genomic stability and cell polarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 95(6), 2950-5.
18. Yamashita, Y. M., et al. (2007). Asymmetric inheritance of mother versus daughter centrosome in stem cell division. Science, 315(5811), 518-21.
19. Fukasawa, K. (2007). Oncogenes and tumour suppressors take on centrosomes. Nature reviews. Cancer, 7(12), 911-24.
20. Gundersen, G. G., & Bulinski, J. C. (1988). Selective stabilization of microtubules oriented toward the direction of cell migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 85(16), 5946-50.
21. Lauffenburger, D. A., & Horwitz, A. F. (1996). Cell migration: a physically integrated molecular process. Cell, 84(3), 359-69.
22. Waterman-Storer, C. M., & Salmon, E. (1999). Positive feedback interactions between microtubule and actin dynamics during cell motility. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 11(1), 61-7.
23. Wittmann, T., & Waterman-Storer, C. M. (2001). Cell motility: can Rho GTPases and microtubules point the way? J Cell Sci, 114(Pt 21), 3795-803.
24. Mogilner, A., & Keren, K. (2009). The shape of motile cells. Curr Biol, 19(17), R762-71.
25. Ridley, A. J., et al. (2003). Cell migration: integrating signals from front to back. Science, 302(5651), 1704-9.
26. Borisy, G. G., & Svitkina, T. M. (2000). Actin machinery: pushing the envelope. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 12(1), 104-12.
27. Mullins, R. D., Heuser, J. A., & Pollard, T. D. (1998). The interaction of Arp2/3 complex with actin: nucleation, high affinity pointed end capping, and formation of branching networks of filaments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 95(11), 6181-6.
28. Nelson, W. J. (2003). Tube morphogenesis: closure, but many openings remain. Trends Cell Biol, 13(12), 615-21.
29. Vasiliev, J. M. (2004). Cytoskeletal mechanisms responsible for invasive migration of neoplastic cells. Int J Dev Biol, 48(5-6), 425-39.
30. Kanchanawong, P., et al. (2010). Nanoscale architecture of integrin-based cell adhesions. Nature, 468(7323), 580-4.
31. Chrzanowska-Wodnicka, M., & Burridge, K. (1996). Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions. J Cell Biol, 133(6), 1403-15.
32. Dugina, V., et al. (2001). Focal adhesion features during myofibroblastic differentiation are controlled by intracellular and extracellular factors. J Cell Sci, 114(Pt 18), 3285-96.
33. Geiger, B., & Bershadsky, A. (2002). Exploring the neighborhood: adhesion-coupled cell mechanosensors. Cell, 110(2), 139-42.
34. Defilippi, P., et al. (1999). Actin cytoskeleton organization in response to integrin-mediated adhesion. Microsc Res Tech, 47(1), 67-78.
35. Kaverina, I., Krylyshkina, O., & Small, J. V. (1999). Microtubule targeting of substrate contacts promotes their relaxation and dissociation. J Cell Biol, 146(5), 1033-44.
36. Rid, R., et al. (2005). The last but not the least: the origin and significance of trailing adhesions in fibroblastic cells. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton, 61(3), 161-71.
37. Vasiliev, J. M., et al. (2004). Rho overexpression leads to mitosis-associated detachment of cells from epithelial sheets: a link to the mechanism of cancer dissemination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 101(34), 12526-30.
38. Levina, E. M., et al. (2001). Cytoskeletal control of fibroblast length: experiments with linear strips of substrate. J Cell Sci, 114(Pt 23), 4335-41.
39. Kharitonova, M. A., & Vasiliev, J. M. (2008). Controlling cell length. Semin Cell Dev Biol, 19(6), 480-4.
40. Rodriguez, O. C., et al. (2003). Conserved microtubule-actin interactions in cell movement and morphogenesis. Nat Cell Biol, 5(7), 599-609.
41. Chang, Y. C., et al. (2008). GEF-H1 couples nocodazole-induced microtubule disassembly to cell contractility via RhoA. Mol Biol Cell, 19(5), 2147-53.
42. Danowski, B. A. (1989). Fibroblast contractility and actin organization are stimulated by microtubule inhibitors. J Cell Sci, 93(Pt 2), 255-66.
43. Dujardin, D. L., et al. (2003). A role for cytoplasmic dynein and LIS1 in directed cell movement. J Cell Biol, 163(6), 1205-11.
44. Sutterlin, C., & Colanzi, A. (2010). The Golgi and the centrosome: building a functional partnership. J Cell Biol, 188(5), 621-8.
45. Vinke, F. P., Grieve, A. G., & Rabouille, C. (2011). The multiple facets of the Golgi reassembly stacking proteins. The Biochemical Journal, 433(3), 423-33.
46. Yadav, S., & Linstedt, A. D. (2011). Golgi positioning. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 3, 5.
47. Yadav, S., Puri, S., & Linstedt, A. D. (2009). A primary role for Golgi positioning in directed secretion, cell polarity, and wound healing. Molecular biology of the cell, 20(6), 1728-36.
48. Miller, P. M., et al. (2009). Golgi-derived CLASP-dependent microtubules control Golgi organization and polarized trafficking in motile cells. Nature Cell Biology, 11(9), 1069-80.
49. Vinogradova, T., et al. (2012). Concerted effort of centrosomal and Golgi-derived microtubules is required for proper Golgi complex assembly but not for maintenance. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 23(5), 820-33.
50. Wakida, N. M., et al. (2010). An intact centrosome is required for the maintenance of polarization during directional cell migration. PloS One, 5(12), e15462.
51. Hurtado, L., et al. (2011). Disconnecting the Golgi ribbon from the centrosome prevents directional cell migration and ciliogenesis. The Journal of Cell Biology, 193(5), 917-33.
52. Weaver, B. A., & Cleveland, D. W. (2007). Aneuploidy: instigator and inhibitor of tumorigenesis. Cancer Research, 67(21), 10103-5.
53. Guo, H. Q., et al. (2007). Analysis of the cellular centrosome in fine-needle aspirations of the breast. Breast Cancer Research: BCR, 9(4), R48.
54. Perucca-Lostanlen, D., et al. (2004). Distinct MDM2 and P14ARF expression and centrosome amplification in well-differentiated liposarcomas. Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer, 39(2), 99-109.
55. Gong, Y., et al. (2009). Localization of TEIF in the centrosome and its functional association with centrosome amplification in DNA damage, telomere dysfunction and human cancers. Oncogene, 28(12), 1549-60.
56. Sato, N., et al. (1999). Centrosome abnormalities in pancreatic ductal carcinoma. Clinical Cancer Research: An Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 5(5), 963-70.
57. Yang, J., et al. (2004). Twist, a master regulator of morphogenesis, plays an essential role in tumor metastasis. Cell, 117(7), 927-39.
58. Ingber, D. E., Madri, J. A., & Jamieson, J. D. (1981). Role of basal lamina in neoplastic disorganization of tissue architecture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 78(6), 3901-5.
59. Lozano, E., Betson, M., & Braga, V. M. (2003). Tumor progression: small GTPases and loss of cell-cell adhesion. Bioessays, 25(5), 452-63.
60. Ridley, A. J. (2006). Rho GTPases and actin dynamics in membrane protrusions and vesicle trafficking. Trends Cell Biol, 16(10), 522-9.
61. Pihan, G. A., et al. (2001). Centrosome defects can account for cellular and genetic changes that characterize prostate cancer progression. Cancer Res, 61(5), 2212-9.
62. Lingle, W. L., et al. (2002). Centrosome amplification drives chromosomal instability in breast tumor development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 99(4), 1978-83.
63. Bissell, M. J. (2007). Modelling molecular mechanisms of breast cancer and invasion: lessons from the normal gland. Biochem Soc Trans, 35(Pt 1), 18-22.
64. Yilmaz, M., & Christofori, G. (2009). EMT, the cytoskeleton, and cancer cell invasion. Cancer Metastasis Rev, 28(1-2), 15-33.
65. Petroll, W. M., & Ma, L. (2003). Direct, dynamic assessment of cell-matrix interactions inside fibrillar collagen lattices. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton, 55(4), 254-64.
66. Friedl, P., & Wolf, K. (2009). Proteolytic interstitial cell migration: a five-step process. Cancer Metastasis Rev, 28(1-2), 129-35.
67. Wang, W., et al. (2002). Single cell behavior in metastatic primary mammary tumors correlated with gene expression patterns revealed by molecular profiling. Cancer Res, 62(21), 6278-88.
68. Ketema, M., & Sonnenberg, A. (2011). Nesprin-3: a versatile connector between the nucleus and the cytoskeleton. Biochem Soc Trans, 39(6), 1719-24.
69. Khatau, S. B., et al. (2012). The differential formation of the LINC-mediated perinuclear actin cap in pluripotent and somatic cells. PLoS One, 7(5), e36689.
70. Vasiliev, J. M., et al. (1970). Effect of colcemid on the locomotory behaviour of fibroblasts. J Embryol Exp Morphol, 24(3), 625-40.
71. Bershadsky, A. D., Vaisberg, E. A., & Vasiliev, J. M. (1991). Pseudopodial activity at the active edge of migrating fibroblast is decreased after drug-induced microtubule depolymerization. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton, 19(3), 152-8.
72. Malech, H. L., Root, R. K., & Gallin, J. I. (1977). Structural analysis of human neutrophil migration. Centriole, microtubule, and microfilament orientation and function during chemotaxis. J Cell Biol, 75(3), 666-93.
73. Gierke, S., & Wittmann, T. (2012). EB1-recruited microtubule + TIP complexes coordinate protrusion dynamics during 3D epithelial remodeling. Curr Biol, 22(9), 753-62.
74. Sumiyoshi, E., & Sugimoto, A. (2012). Cell polarity: centrosomes release signals for polarization. Curr Biol, 22(8), R281-3.
75. Block, M. R., et al. (2008). Podosome-type adhesions and focal adhesions, so alike yet so different. Eur J Cell Biol, 87(8-9), 491-506.
76. Nakahara, H., et al. (1998). Activation of beta1 integrin signaling stimulates tyrosine phosphorylation of p190RhoGAP and membrane-protrusive activities at invadopodia. J Biol Chem, 273(1), 9-12.
77. Schoumacher, M., et al. (2010). Actin, microtubules, and vimentin intermediate filaments cooperate for elongation of invadopodia. J Cell Biol, 189(3), 541-56.
78. Kikuchi, K., & Takahashi, K. (2008). WAVE2- and microtubule-dependent formation of long protrusions and invasion of cancer cells cultured on three-dimensional extracellular matrices. Cancer Sci, 99(11), 2252-9.
79. Schnaeker, E. M., et al. (2004). Microtubule-dependent matrix metalloproteinase-2/matrix metalloproteinase-9 exocytosis: prerequisite in human melanoma cell invasion. Cancer Res, 64(24), 8924-31.
80. Sbai, O., et al. (2008). Vesicular trafficking and secretion of matrix metalloproteinases-2, -9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 in neuronal cells. Mol Cell Neurosci, 39(4), 549-68.
81. Sbai, O., et al. (2010). Differential vesicular distribution and trafficking of MMP-2, MMP-9, and their inhibitors in astrocytes. Glia, 58(3), 344-66.
82. Hanania, R., et al. (2012). Classically activated macrophages use stable microtubules for matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) secretion. J Biol Chem, 287(11), 8468-83.
83. Takino, T., et al. (2006). Membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase modulates focal adhesion stability and cell migration. Exp Cell Res, 312(8), 1381-9.
84. Takino, T., et al. (2007). Inhibition of membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase at cell-matrix adhesions. Cancer Res, 67(24), 11621-9.
85. Wang, Y., & McNiven, M. A. (2012). Invasive matrix degradation at focal adhesions occurs via protease recruitment by a FAK-p130Cas complex. J Cell Biol, 196(3), 375-85.
86. Bissell, M. J., & Radisky, D. (2001). Putting tumours in context. Nat Rev Cancer, 1(1), 46-54.
87. Paget, S. (1989). The distribution of secondary growths in cancer of the breast. 1889. Cancer Metastasis Rev, 8(2), 98-101.
88. Erler, J. T., & Weaver, V. M. (2009). Three-dimensional context regulation of metastasis. Clin Exp Metastasis, 26(1), 35-49.
89. Bhowmick, N. A., & Moses, H. L. (2005). Tumor-stroma interactions. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 15(1), 97-101.
90. Bosman, F. T., & Stamenkovic, I. (2003). Functional structure and composition of the extracellular matrix. J Pathol, 200(4), 423-8.
91. Kumar, S., & Weaver, V. M. (2009). Mechanics, malignancy, and metastasis: the force journey of a tumor cell. Cancer Metastasis Rev, 28(1-2), 113-27.
92. Paszek, M. J., et al. (2005). Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell, 8(3), 241-54.
93. Reno, F., et al. (2002). Release and activation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 during in vitro mechanical compression in hypertrophic scars. Arch Dermatol, 138(4), 475-8.
94. Friedl, P., & Wolf, K. (2003). Tumour-cell invasion and migration: diversity and escape mechanisms. Nature reviews. Cancer, 3(5), 362-74.
95. Belletti, B., et al. (2010). p27kip1 controls cell morphology and motility by regulating microtubule-dependent lipid raft recycling. Mol Cell Biol, 30(9), 2229-40.
96. Berton, S., et al. (2009). The tumor suppressor functions of p27(kip1) include control of the mesenchymal/amoeboid transition. Mol Cell Biol, 29(18), 5031-45.
97. Bartolini, F., & Gundersen, G. G. (2010). Formins and microtubules. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1803(2), 164-73.
98. Gaillard, J., et al. (2011). Differential interactions of the formins INF2, mDia1, and mDia2 with microtubules. Mol Biol Cell, 22(23), 4575-87.
99. Goode, B. L., & Eck, M. J. (2007). Mechanism and function of formins in the control of actin assembly. Annu Rev Biochem, 76, 593-627.
100. Lutolf, M. P., & Hubbell, J. A. (2005). Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol, 23(1), 47-55.
101. Hiraoka, N., et al. (1998). Matrix metalloproteinases regulate neovascularization by acting as pericellular fibrinolysins. Cell, 95(3), 365-77.
102. Chun, J., et al. (2003). Cultures of ligament fibroblasts in fibrin matrix gel. Connect Tissue Res, 44(2), 81-7.
103. Sabeh, F., et al. (2004). Tumor cell traffic through the extracellular matrix is controlled by the membrane-anchored collagenase MT1-MMP. J Cell Biol, 167(4), 769-81.
104. Filippov, S., et al. (2005). MT1-matrix metalloproteinase directs arterial wall invasion and neointima formation by vascular smooth muscle cells. J Exp Med, 202(5), 663-71.
105. Gaggioli, C., et al. (2007). Fibroblast-led collective invasion of carcinoma cells with differing roles for RhoGTPases in leading and following cells. Nat Cell Biol, 9(12), 1392-400.
106. Nagano, S., et al. (2008). Cancer cell death enhances the penetration and efficacy of oncolytic herpes simplex virus in tumors. Cancer Res, 68(10), 3795-802.
107. Trepat, X., & Fredberg, J. J. (2011). Plithotaxis and emergent dynamics in collective cellular migration. Trends Cell Biol, 21(11), 638-46.
108. Hegerfeldt, Y., et al. (2002). Collective cell movement in primary melanoma explants: plasticity of cell-cell interaction, beta1-integrin function, and migration strategies. Cancer Research, 62(7), 2125-30.
109. Friedl, P., & Gilmour, D. (2009). Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology, 10(7), 445-57.
110. Hockel, M., & Vaupel, P. (2001). Tumor hypoxia: definitions and current clinical, biologic, and molecular aspects. J Natl Cancer Inst, 93(4), 266-76.
111. Klein, A., Flugel, D., & Kietzmann, T. (2008). Transcriptional regulation of serine/threonine kinase-15 (STK15) expression by hypoxia and HIF-1. Mol Biol Cell, 19(9), 3667-75.
112. Katayama, H., et al. (2001). Interaction and feedback regulation between STK15/BTAK/Aurora-A kinase and protein phosphatase 1 through mitotic cell division cycle. J Biol Chem, 276(49), 46219-24.
113. Condeelis, J., & Pollard, J. W. (2006). Macrophages: obligate partners for tumor cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. Cell, 124(2), 263-6.
114. Glinskii, A. B., et al. (2003). Viable circulating metastatic cells produced in orthotopic but not ectopic prostate cancer models. Cancer Res, 63(14), 4239-43.
115. Whipple, R. A., et al. (2008). Vimentin filaments support extension of tubulin-based microtentacles in detached breast tumor cells. Cancer Res, 68(14), 5678-88.
116. Matrone, M. A., et al. (2010). Microtentacles tip the balance of cytoskeletal forces in circulating tumor cells. Cancer Res, 70(20), 7737-41.
117. Whipple, R. A., Cheung, A. M., & Martin, S. S. (2007). Detyrosinated microtubule protrusions in suspended mammary epithelial cells promote reattachment. Exp Cell Res, 313(7), 1326-36.
118. Kramer, A., Maier, B., & Bartek, J. (2011). Centrosome clustering and chromosomal (in)stability: a matter of life and death. Mol Oncol, 5(4), 324-35.
119. Ogden, A., P.C. Rida, and R. Aneja (2012) Let's huddle to prevent a muddle: centrosome declustering as an attractive anticancer strategy. Cell Death Differ 19:1255-1267
120. Grinberg-Rashi, H., et al. (2009). The expression of three genes in primary non-small cell lung cancer is associated with metastatic spread to the brain. Clinical Cancer Research: An Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 15(5), 1755-61.
121. Kraljevic Pavelic, S., et al.,(2011) Metastasis: new perspectives on an old problem. Molecular cancer, 10: p. 22
122. Kurokawa, K., et al. (2005). Mechanism and role of localized activation of Rho-family GTPases in growth factor-stimulated fibroblasts and neuronal cells. Biochem Soc Trans, 33(Pt 4), 631-4.