Beyond mammography: New frontiers in breast cancer screening

American Journal of Medicine

Volumn 126, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 472-479

  Drukteinis, Jennifer S ^a   Mooney, Blaise P ^a   Flowers, Chris I ^a   Gatenby, Robert A ^a  

^a H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast; Breast imaging; BSGI; Contrast enhanced mammography; Low dose mammography; Mammography; MRI; PEM; Screening; Screening whole breast ultrasound; Tomosynthesis

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; METHOXY ISOBUTYL ISONITRILE TECHNETIUM TC 99M;

ANXIETY; AUTOMATED WHOLE BREAST ULTRASOUND SYSTEM; AUTOMATION; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST SPECIFIC GAMMA IMAGING; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CONTRAST ENHANCED DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; DIGITAL IMAGING; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; GROUPS BY AGE; HEALTH CARE COST; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; IMAGE GUIDED BIOPSY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MOLECULAR IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; POSITRON EMISSION MAMMOGRAPHY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASOUND SCANNER;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MOLECULAR IMAGING; RADIATION DOSAGE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 84878015745     PISSN: 00029343     EISSN: 15557162     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.11.025     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. C.K. Kuhl, W. Kuhn, H. Schild Management of women at high risk for breast cancer: new imaging beyond mammography Breast 14 6 2005 480 486
2. T.M. Kolb, J. Lichy, J.H. Newhouse Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations Radiology 225 1 2002 165 175
3. M.T. Mandelson, N. Oestreicher, P.L. Porter Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval-and screen-detected cancers J Natl Cancer Inst 92 13 2000 1081 1087
4. A. Pijpe, N. Andrieu, D.F. Easton Exposure to diagnostic radiation and risk of breast cancer among carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations: retrospective cohort study (GENE-RAD-RISK) BMJ 345 2012 e5660
5. A.R. Aro, H.J. de Koning, P. Absetz, M. Schreck Two distinct groups of non-attenders in an organized mammography screening program Breast Cancer Res Treat 70 2 2001 145 153
6. D.D. Dershaw Mammographic screening of the high-risk woman Am J Surg 180 4 2000 288 289
7. P.A. Carney, D.L. Miglioretti, B.C. Yankaskas Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography Ann Intern Med 138 3 2003 168 175
8. H.D. Nelson, K. Tyne, A. Naik Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Ann Intern Med 151 10 2009 727 737 W237-W242
9. Board on Radiation Effects Research, Division on Earth and Life Sciences, National Research Council of the National Academies Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2 2006 National Academies Press Washington, DC
10. S.A. Feig, R.E. Hendrick Radiation risk from screening mammography of women aged 40-49 years J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 22 1997 119 124
11. M. Aslund, B. Cederstrom, M. Lundqvist, M. Danielsson Scatter rejection in multislit digital mammography Med Phys 33 4 2006 933 940
12. P. Baldelli, J. McCullagh, N. Phelan, F. Flanagan Comprehensive dose survey of breast screening in Ireland Radiat Prot Dosimetry 145 1 2011 52 60
13. E.B. Cole, A.Y. Toledano, M. Lundqvist, E.D. Pisano Comparison of radiologist performance with photon-counting full-field digital mammography to conventional full-field digital mammography Acad Radiol 19 8 2012 916 922
14. J.M. Lewin, P.K. Isaacs, V. Vance, F.J. Larke Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility Radiology 229 1 2003 261 268
15. C. Dromain, C. Balleyguier, S. Muller Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography AJR Am J Roentgenol 187 5 2006 W528 W537
16. R.A. Jong, M.J. Yaffe, M. Skarpathiotakis Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience Radiology 228 3 2003 842 850
17. C. Dromain, F. Thibault, F. Diekmann Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study Breast Cancer Res 14 3 2012 R94
18. J.T. Dobbins 3rd Tomosynthesis imaging: at a translational crossroads Med Phys 36 6 2009 1956 1967
19. J.T. Dobbins 3rd, D.J. Godfrey Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential Phys Med Biol 48 19 2003 R65 R106
20. S.P. Poplack, T.D. Tosteson, C.A. Kogel, H.M. Nagy Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography AJR Am J Roentgenol 189 3 2007 616 623
21. S.S. Feng, I. Sechopoulos Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization Radiology 263 1 2012 35 42
22. J.A. Harvey, V.E. Bovbjerg Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk Radiology 230 1 2004 29 41
23. V.A. McCormack, I. dos Santos Silva Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15 6 2006 1159 1169
24. N.F. Boyd, H. Guo, L.J. Martin Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer N Engl J Med 356 3 2007 227 236
25. C.H. van Gils, J.D. Otten, A.L. Verbeek, J.H. Hendriks Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: masking bias or causality? Eur J Epidemiol 14 4 1998 315 320
26. J. Whitehead, T. Carlile, K.J. Kopecky Wolfe mammographic parenchymal patterns A study of the masking hypothesis of Egan and Mosteller Cancer 56 6 1985 1280 1286
27. E. Sala, R. Warren, J. McCann Mammographic parenchymal patterns and mode of detection: implications for the breast screening programme J Med Screen 5 4 1998 207 212
28. W.A. Berg, C. Campassi, P. Langenberg, M.J. Sexton Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment AJR Am J Roentgenol 174 6 2000 1769 1777
29. E.A. Ooms, H.M. Zonderland, M.J. Eijkemans Mammography: interobserver variability in breast density assessment Breast 16 6 2007 568 576
30. J.J. Heine, E.E. Fowler, C.I. Flowers Full field digital mammography and breast density: comparison of calibrated and noncalibrated measurements Acad Radiol 18 11 2011 1430 1436
31. W.A. Berg, Z. Zhang, D. Lehrer Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk JAMA 307 13 2012 1394 1404
32. K.M. Kelly, G.A. Richwald Automated whole-breast ultrasound: advancing the performance of breast cancer screening Semin Ultrasound CT MR 32 4 2011 273 280
33. K.M. Kelly, J. Dean, W.S. Comulada, S.J. Lee Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts Eur Radiol 20 3 2010 734 742
34. D. Saslow, C. Boetes, W. Burke American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography CA Cancer J Clin 57 2 2007 75 89
35. M.H. Gail, L.A. Brinton, D.P. Byar Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually J Natl Cancer Inst 81 24 1989 1879 1886
36. E.B. Claus, N. Risch, W.D. Thompson Autosomal dominant inheritance of early-onset breast cancer Implications for risk prediction Cancer 73 3 1994 643 651
37. D.A. Berry, E.S. Iversen Jr, D.F. Gudbjartsson BRCAPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes J Clin Oncol 20 11 2002 2701 2712
38. J. Tyrer, S.W. Duffy, J. Cuzick A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors Stat Med 23 7 2004 1111 1130
39. C. Taneja, J. Edelsberg, D. Weycker Cost effectiveness of breast cancer screening with contrast-enhanced MRI in high-risk women J Am Coll Radiol 6 3 2009 171 179
40. S.K. Plevritis, A.W. Kurian, B.M. Sigal Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging JAMA 295 20 2006 2374 2384
41. M. Kriege, C.T. Brekelmans, C. Boetes Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition N Engl J Med 351 5 2004 427 437
42. R.E. Hendrick Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies Radiology 257 1 2010 246 253