Learning and performance with gesture guides

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1109-1118

  Anderson, Fraser ^a   Bischof, Walter F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Gestures; Guides; Learning

Indexed keywords

DESIGN AND EVALUATIONS; EVALUATION; GESTURE-BASED INTERFACE; GESTURES; GUIDES; LEARNING; PERFORMANCE BENEFITS; SMOOTH TRANSITIONS;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 84877946803     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2470654.2466143     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. Albaret, J. M. and Thon, B. Differential effects of task complexity on contextual interference in a drawing task. Acta Psychologia, 100(1-2), 1998, pp. 9-24.
2. Appert, C. and Bau, O. Scale Detection for a priori Gesture Recognition. In Proc. ACM CHI 2010. pp. 879-882.
3. Appert C. and Zhai, S. Using strokes as command shortcuts: cognitive benefits and toolkit support. In Proc. ACM CHI 2009, pp. 2289-2298.
4. Bau O. and Mackay W. OctoPocus: a dynamic guide for learning gesture-based command sets. In Proc. ACM UIST 2009, pp. 37-46.
5. Bennett, M. McCarthy, K., O'Modhrain, S. and Smyth, B. Simpleflow: enhancing gestural interaction with gesture prediction, abbreviation and autocompletion. In Proc. INTERACT 2011, pp. 591-608.
6. Bragdon, A., Uguray, A., Wigdor, D., Anagnostopoulos, S., Zeleznik, R., and Feman, R. Gesture play: motivating online gesture learning with fun, positive reinforcement and physical metaphors. In Proc. ACM ITS 2010, pp. 39-48.
7. Bragdon, A., Zeleznik, R., Williamson, B., Miller, T., and LaViola J. J. GestureBar: improving the approachability of gesture-based interfaces. In Proc. ACM UIST 2008, pp. 2269-2278.
8. Brydges, R., Carnahan, H., Backstein D. and Dubrowski, A. Application of Motor Learning Principles to Complex Surgical Tasks: Searching for the Optimal Practice Schedule. Journal of Motor Behavior, 39(1), 2007, pp. 40-48.
9. Cao, X. and Zhai, S. Modeling human performance of pen stroke gestures. In Proc. ACM CHI 2007, pp. 1495-1504.
10. Chapman, C. S., Gallivan, J. P., Wood, D. W., Milne, J.L., Culham, J. C. and Goodale, M.A. Reaching for the unknown: Multiple target encoding and real-time decision-making in a rapid reach task. Cognition, 2010, 116(2), pp. 168-176.
11. Cockburn, A., Kristensson, P., Alexander, J. and Zhai, S. Hard lessons: effort-inducing interfaces benefit spatial learning. In Proc. ACM CHI 2007, pp. 1571-1580.
12. Fitts, P. M. and Posner, M. I. Human Performance. Brooks and Cole, Oxford, England, 1967.
13. Freeman, D., Benko, H., Morris, M. R. and Wigdor, D. ShadowGuides: Visualizations for in-situ learning of multi-touch and whole-hand gestures. In Proc. of ACM ITS 2009, pp. 165-172.
14. Grossman, T., Dragicevic, P. and Balakrishnan, R. Strategies for accelerating online learning of hotkeys. In Proc. ACM CHI 2007, 1591-1600.
15. Helsen, W. F., Hodges, N. J., Van Winckel, J. and Starkes, J. L. The roles of talent, physical precocity and practive in the development of soccer expertise. Journal of Sports Sciences, 18(9), 2000, pp. 727-736.
16. Kristensson, P. O. and Denby, L. C. Continuous recognition and visualization of pen strokes and touch-screen gestures. In Proc. ACM Eurographics SBIM 2011, pp. 95-102.
17. Kristensson, P. O. and Zhai, S. SHARK: a large vocabulary shorthand writing system for pen-based computers. In Proc. ACM UIST 2004, pp. 43-52.
18. Kurtenbach, G. P., Sellen, A. J., and Buxton, W. A. S. An empirical evaluation of some articulatory and cognitive aspects of marking menus. Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 8(1), 1993, pp. 1-23.
19. Kurtenbach, G., Moran, T. P., and Buxton, W. Contextual animation of gestural commands. Computer Graphics Forum, 13(5), 1994, pp. 305-314.
20. Lai, Q. and Shea, C. H. The role of reduced frequency of knowledge of results during constant practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70, 1999, pp. 33-40.
21. Lepinski, J., Grossman, T., and Fitzmaurice, G. The design and evaluation of multitouch marking menus. In Proc. CHI 2010, pp. 2233-2242.
22. Oldfield, R. C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 1971, pp. 97-113.
23. Ouyang, T. and Li, Y. Bootstrapping Personal Gesture Shortcuts with the Wisdom of the Crowd and Handwriting Recognition. In Proc. CHI 2012, pp. 2895-2904.
24. Park, J., Shea, C. H. and Wright, D. L. Reduced frequency concurrent and terminal feedback: A test of the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 2000, pp. 278-296.
25. Panzer S., Krueger, M., Muehlbauer, T. and Shea, C. H. Asymmetric effector transfer of complex movement sequences. Human Movement Science, 2010 29(1), pp. 62-72.
26. Rappin, N., Guzdial, M. Realff, M., and Ludovice, P. Balancing usability and learning in an interface. In Proc. ACM CHI 1997, pp. 470-486.
27. Rubine, D. Specifying gestures by example. In SIGGRAPH 1991, pp. 239-337.
28. Sainburg, R. L. and Wang, J. Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: independence of direction and final position information. Experimental Brain Research, 2002, 145(4), pp. 437-447.
29. Savion-Lemieux, T. and Penhune, V. The effects of practice and delay on motor skill learning and retention. Experimental Brain Research, 161(4), 2005, pp. 423-431.
30. Schmidt, R. A. Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In J. Requin and G. E. Stelmach (Eds.), Tutorials in motor neuroscience, 1991, pp. 59-75.
31. Schmidt, R. Motor Learning Concepts and Research Methods. In Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis, 2011, pp. 325-346.
32. Schmidt, R. A. and Bjork, R. A. New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 1992, pp. 207-217.
33. Schmidt, R. A. and Wulf, G. Continuous concurrent feedback degrades skill learning: Implications for training and simulation. Human Factors, 39, 1997, pp. 509-525.
34. Schmidt, R. A., Young, D. E., Swinnen, S. and Shapiro, D. E. Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 1989, pp. 352-359.
35. Shea, J. B. and Morgan, R. Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5(2), 1979, pp. 179-187.
36. Sigrist, R. Rauter, G., Riener, R. and Wolf, P. Augmented visual, auditory, haptic and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2012, pp. 1-33.
37. van Nimwegen, C. and van Oostendorp, H. Guidance in the interface and transfer of task performance. In Proc. ACM ECCE, 2007, pp. 225-232.
38. Winstein, C. J. and Schmidt, R. A. Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 1990, pp. 677-691.
39. Wobbrock, J. O., Morris, M. R. and Wilson, A. D. Userdefined gestures for surface computing. In Proc. ACM UIST 2003, pp. 193-202.
40. Wobbrock, J., Wilson, A. and Li, Y. Gestures without libraries, toolkits, or training: a $1 recognizer for user interface prototypes. In Proc. ACM UIST 2007, pp. 159-168.
41. Zajicek, M. Aspects of HCI research for older people. Universal Access in the Information Society. 5(3), 2006, pp. 279-286.
42. Zhai, S. and Kristensson P.O. Modeling Human Performance of Pen Stroke Gestures. In Proc. ACM CHI 2003, pp. 97-104.
43. Zhao, S. and Balakrishnan, R. Simple vs. computing mark hierarchical marking menus. In Proc. ACM UIST 2004, pp. 33-42.