Asymmetric effector transfer of complex movement sequences

Human Movement Science

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 62-72

  Panzer, Stefan ^a   Krueger, Melanie ^a   Muehlbauer, Thomas ^a   Shea, Charles H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Effector transfer sequence coding; Inter manual transfer; Load compensation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN ASYMMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIMB MOVEMENT; LOADING TEST; MALE; MOTOR COORDINATION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77049107315     PISSN: 01679457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2009.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bagesteiro L.B., Sainburg R.L. Nondominant arm advantages in load compensation during rapid elbow joint movements. Journal of Neurophysiology 2003, 90:1503-1513.
2. Bagesteiro L.B., Sainburg R.L. Interlimb transfer of load compensation during rapid elbow joint movements. Experimental Brain Research 2005, 161:155-165.
3. Braden H., Panzer S., Shea C.H. The effects of sequence difficulty and practice on proportional and non-proportional transfer. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2008, 61:1321-1339.
4. Criscimagna-Hemminger S.E., Donchin O., Gazzaniga M.S., Shadmehr R. Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm. Journal of Neurophysiology 2003, 89:168-176.
5. Dean N.J., Kovacs A.J., Shea C.H. Transfer of movement sequences: Bigger is better. Acta Psychologica 2008, 127:355-368.
6. Galea J.M., Miall R.C., Woolley D.G. Asymmetric interlimb transfer of concurrent adaptation to opposing dynamic forces. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 182:267-273.
7. Hicks R.E. Asymmetry of bilateral transfer. The American Journal of Psychology 1974, 87:667-674.
8. Hikosaka O., Nakahara H., Rand M.K., Sakai K., Lu X., Nakamura K., et al. Parallel neural networks for learning sequential procedures. Trends in Neuroscience 1999, 22:464-471.
9. Keele S.W., Jennings P., Jones S., Caulton D., Cohen A. On the modularity of sequence representation. Journal of Motor Behavior 1995, 27:17-30.
10. Kovacs A.J., Muehlbauer T., Shea C.H. The coding and effector transfer of movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception, and Performance 2009, 35:390-407.
11. Kumar S., Mandal M.K. Bilateral transfer of skill in left- and right-handers. Laterality 2005, 10:337-344.
12. Lange R.K., Braun C., Godde B. Coordinate processing during the left-to-right hand transfer investigated by EEG. Experimental Brain Research 2006, 168:547-556.
13. Laszlo J.L., Baguley R.A., Bairstow P.J. Bilateral transfer in tapping skill in the absence of peripheral information. Journal of Motor Behavior 1970, 2:261-271.
14. Muehlbauer T., Panzer S., Shea C.H. The transfer of movement sequences: Effects of decreased and increased load. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 60:770-778.
15. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologica 1971, 9:97-113.
16. Panzer S., Muehlbauer T., Krueger M., Buesch D., Naundorf F., Shea C.H. Effects of bilateral practice on coding and learning of movement sequences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62:1265-1276.
17. Panzer S., Shea C.H. The learning of two similar complex sequences: Does practice insulate a sequence from interference?. Human Movement Science 2008, 27:873-887.
18. Park J.H., Shea C.H. Effector independence. Journal of Motor Behavior 2002, 34:253-270.
19. Park J.H., Shea C.H. Effect of practice on effector independence. Journal of Motor Behavior 2003, 35:33-40.
20. Park J.H., Shea C.H. The detection and utilization of sequence information: Influence on response structure and effector transfer. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2005, 58:387-419.
21. Parker-Taillon D., Kerr R. Manual asymmetries within the performance of a complex motor task. Human Movement Science 1989, 8:33-44.
22. Parlow S.E., Kinbourne M. Asymmetrical transfer of training between hands: Implications for inter hemispheric communication in normal brain. Brain and Cognition 1989, 11:98-111.
23. Povel D., Collard R. Structural factors in patterned finger tapping. Acta Psychologica 1982, 52:107-123.
24. Rosenbaum D.A., Kenny S., Derr M.A. Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1983, 9:86-102.
25. Rosenbaum D.A., Saltzman E. A motor-program editor. Cognition and motor processes 1984, Vol. VIII:93-106. Springer, Berlin.
26. Rosenbaum D.A., Saltzman E., Kingman A. Choosing between movement sequences. Preparatory states and processes 1984, 119-134. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. S. Kornblum, J. Requin (Eds.).
27. Sainburg R.L. Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness. Experimental Brain Research 2002, 142:241-258.
28. Sainburg R.L. Handedness: Differential specializations for control of trajectory and position. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews 2005, 33:206-213.
29. Sainburg R.L., Kalakanis D. Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching. Journal of Neurophysiology 2000, 83:2661-2675.
30. Sainburg R.L., Wang J.S. Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: Independence of direction and final position information. Experimental Brain Research 2002, 145:437-447.
31. Schabowsky C.H., Hidler J.M., Lum P. Greater reliance on impedance control in the nondominant arm compared with the dominant arm when adapting to a novel dynamic environment. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 182:567-577.
32. Shea C.H., Aranda R.L. Differences between discrete and continuous movement sequences. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology 2005, 27:138.
33. Taylor H.G., Heilman K.M. Left-hemisphere motor dominance in righthanders. Cortex 1980, 16:587-603.
34. Thut G., Cook N.D., Regard M., Leenders K.L., Halsband U., Landis T. Intermanual transfer of proximal and distal motor engrams in humans. Experimental Brain Research 1996, 108:321-327.
35. Verwey W.B. Evidence for the development of concurrent processing in a sequential key pressing task. Acta Psychologica 1994, 85:245-262.
36. Verwey W.B. Evidence for a multi-stage model of practice in a sequential movement task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:1693-1708.
37. Verwey W.B. Concatenating familiar movement sequences: The versatile cognitive processor. Acta Psychologica 2001, 106:69-95.
38. Wang J.S., Sainburg R.L. Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations depends on handedness. Experimental Brain Research 2006, 175:223-230.
39. Whitacre C., Shea C.H. The role of practice variability in retention, parameter transfer, and effector transfer: Relative (GMP) and absolute (Parameter) errors. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2002, 73:47-57.
40. Wilde H., Shea C.H. Proportional and non-proportional transfer of movement sequences. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2006, 59:1626-1647.