Sensitivity of bow-echo simulation to microphysical parameterizations

Weather and Forecasting

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1188-1209

  Adams Selin, Rebecca D ^a,b   Van Den Heever, Susan C ^a   Johnson, Richard H ^a  

^a Department of Mechanical Engineering   (United States)

^b ATMOSPHERIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBIENT ENVIRONMENT; AREAL COVERAGE; FIVE PARAMETERS; MICROPHYSICAL PARAMETERIZATION; PARAMETER CHARACTERISTIC; PEAK VALUES; PRECIPITATION EFFICIENCY; WEATHER RESEARCH AND FORECASTING MODELS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COOLING SYSTEMS; PARAMETERIZATION; PRECIPITATION (METEOROLOGY);

WEATHER FORECASTING;

CONVECTIVE SYSTEM; COOLING; GUST; HAIL; HYDROMETEOROLOGY; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; PRECIPITATION ASSESSMENT; WEATHER FORECASTING;

EID: 84877860818     PISSN: 08828156     EISSN: 15200434     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/WAF-D-12-00108.1     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Adams-Selin, R. D., and R. H. Johnson, 2010: Mesoscale surface pressure and temperature features associated with bow echoes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 212-227.
2. Adams-Selin, R. D., and R. H. Johnson, S. C. van den Heever, and R. H. Johnson, 2013: Impact of graupel parameterization schemes on idealized bow echo simulations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 1241-1262.
3. Alexander, C. R., S. S. Weygandt, S. G. Benjamin, T. G. Smirnova, J. M. Brown, P. Hofmann, and E. P. James, 2011: The High Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR): Recent and future en¬hancements, time-lagged ensembling, and 2010 forecast evaluation activities. Preprints, 20th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Seattle, WA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 12B.2. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/91Annual/ webprogram/Paper183065.html.]
4. Bryan, G. H., and H. Morrison, 2012: Sensitivity of a simulated squall line to horizontal resolution and parameterization of microphysics. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 202-225.
5. Charba, J., 1974: Application of gravity current modelto analysis of squall-line gust front. Mon. Wea. Rev., 102, 140-156.
6. Chin, H. N. S., 1994: The impact of the ice phase and radiation of a midlatitude squall line system. J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 3320-3343.
7. Clark, A. J., and Coauthors, 2012: An overview of the 2010 Haz¬ardous Weather Testbed Experimental Forecast Program Spring Experiment. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 55-74.
8. Cohen, C., and E. W. McCaul Jr., 2006: The sensitivity of simulated convective storms to variations in prescribed single-moment microphysics parameters that describe particle distributions, sizes, and numbers. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2547-2565.
9. Du, J., G. Dimego, Z. Toth, D. Jovic, B. Zhou, J. Zhu, J. Wang, and H. Juang, 2009: Recent upgrade of NCEP Short-Range Ensemble Forecast (SREF) system. Preprints, 23rd Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting/19th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Omaha, NE, Amer. Meteor. Soc, 4A.4. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/ 153264.pdf.]
10. Ek, M. B., K. E. Mitchell, Y. Lin, E. Rogers, P. Grunmann, V. Koren, G. Gayno, and J. D. Tarpley, 2003: Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers of Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta model. J. Geophys. Res., 108,8851, doi:10.1029/2002JD003296.
11. Ferrier, B. S., Y. Jin, Y. Lin, T. Black, E. Rogers, and G DiMego, 2002: Implementation of a new grid-scale cloud and precipi¬tation scheme in the NCEP Eta Model. Preprints, 19th Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting/15th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc, 10.1. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/ 47241.pdf.]
12. Fovell, R. G, and Y. Ogura, 1988: Numerical simulation of a midlatitude squall line in two dimensions. J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 3846-3879.
13. Gallus, W. A., Jr., and R. H. Johnson, 1995: The dynamics of cir¬culations within the trailing stratiform regions of squall lines. Part II: Influence of the convective line and ambient envi¬ronment. J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 2188-2211.
14. Gilmore, M. S., J. M. Straka, and E. N. Rasmussen, 2004a: Pre¬ cipitation and evolution sensitivity in simulated deep convec¬ tive storms: Comparisons between liquid-only and simple ice and liquid phase microphysics. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132,1897-1916.
15. Gilmore, M. S., J. M. Straka, and E. N. Rasmussen, 2004b: Precipitation uncertainty due to var- iations in precipitation particle parameters within a simple microphysics scheme. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 2610-2627.
16. Hong, S. Y., and J. O. J. Lim, 2006: The WRF single-moment 6-class microphysics scheme (WSM6). J. Korean Meteor. Soc, 42,129-151.
17. J. Dudhia, and S. H. Chen, 2004: A reviewed approach to ice microphysical processes for the bulk parameterization of clouds and precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132,103-120.
18. K. S. S. Lim, Y. H. Lee, J. C Ha, H. W. Kim, S. J. Ham, and J. Dudhia, 2010: Evaluation of the WRF double-moment 6-class microphysics scheme for precipitating convection. Adv. Meteor., 2010,707253, doi:10.1155/2010/707253.
19. Janjic, Z., 1994: The step-mountain eta coordinate model: Further developments of the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbu¬lence closure schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122, 927-945.
20. Jankov, I., W. A. Gallus Jr., M. Segal, B. Shaw, and S. E. Koch, 2005: The impact of different WRF model physical parame-terizations and their interactions on warm season MCS rain¬fall. Wea. Forecasting, 20,1048-1060.
21. Johnson, A., X. Wang, M. Xue, and F. Kong, 2011: Hierarchical cluster analysis of a convection-allowing ensemble during the Hazardous Weather Testbed 2009 Spring Experiment. Part II: Ensemble clustering over the whole experiment period. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 3694-3710.
22. Kain, J. S., and Coauthors, 2008: Some practical considerations regarding horizontal resolution in the first generation of operational convection-allowing NWP. Wea. Forecasting, 23, 931-952.
23. Kessler, E., 1969: On the Distribution and Continuity of Water Substance in Atmospheric Circulations. Meteor. Monogr., No. 32, Amer. Meteor. Soc, 84 pp.
24. Klimowski, B. A., M. R. Hjelmfelt, and M. J. Bunkers, 2004: Radar observations of the early evolution of bow echoes. Wea. Forecasting, 19,727-734.
25. Lim, K. S. S., and S. Y. Hong, 2010: Development of an effective double-moment cloud microphysics scheme with prognostic cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) for weather and climate models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 1587-1612.
26. Lin, Y. L., R. D. Farley, and H. D. Orville, 1983: Bulk parame-terization of the snow field in a cloud model. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 22, 1065-1092.
27. Liu, C., and M. W. Moncrieff, 2007: Sensitivity of cloud-resolving simulations of warm-season convection to cloud microphysics parameterizations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 2854-2868.
28. Luo, Y., Y. Wang, H. Wang, Y. Zheng, and H. Morrison, 2010: Modeling convective-stratiform precipitation processes on a mei-yu front with the Weather Research and Forecasting model: Comparison with observations and sensitivity to cloud microphysics parameterizations. J. Geophys. Res., 115, D18117, doi:10.1029/2010JD013873.
29. McCumber, M., W. K. Tao, J. Simpson, R. Penc, and S. T. Soong, 1991: Comparison of ice-phase microphysical parameteriza¬tion schemes using numerical simulations of tropical convec¬tion. J. Appl. Meteor., 30, 985-1004.
30. Mlawer, E. J., S. J. Taubman, T. D. Brown, M. J. Iacono, and S. A. Clough, 1997: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmo¬spheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J. Geophys. Res., 102, 16 663-16 682.
31. Molthan, A. L., J. L. Case, S. R. Dembek, G. J. Jedlovec, and W. M. Lapenta, 2008: The Super Tuesday outbreak: Forecast sensi¬tivities to single-moment microphysics schemes. Preprints, 24th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Savannah, GA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 17B.3. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/ pdfpapers/141747.pdf.]
32. Morrison, H., and J. Milbrandt, 2011: Comparison of two-moment bulk microphysics schemes in idealized supercell thunderstorm simulations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 1103- 1130.
33. Morrison, H., and J. Milbrandt, G. Thompson, and V. Tatarskii, 2009: Impact of cloud mi-crophysics on the development of trailing stratiform pre-cipitation in a simulated squall line: Comparison of one- and two-moment schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 991-1007.
34. Nicholls, M. E., 1987: A comparison of the results of a two-dimensional numerical simulation of a tropical squall line with observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 115, 3055-3077.
35. Rotunno, R., J. B. Klemp, and M. L. Weisman, 1988: A theory for strong, long-lived squall lines. J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 463- 485.
36. Rutledge, S. A., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1987: A diagnostic modeling study of the trailing stratiform region of a midlatitude squall line. J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 2640-2656.
37. Schwartz, C. S., and Coauthors, 2010: Toward improved convection-allowing ensembles: Model physics sensitivities and optimizing probabilistic guidance with small ensemble membership. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 263-280.
38. Skamarock, W. C., and M. L. Weisman, 2009: The impact of positive-definite moisture transport on NWP precipitation forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 488-494.
39. Skamarock, W. C., and M. L. Weisman, and Coauthors, 2008: A description of the Advanced Re-search WRF version 3. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-4751STR, 113 pp.
40. Steiner, M., R. A. Houze Jr., and S. E. Yuter, 1995: Climatological characterization of three-dimensional storm structure from operational radar and rain gauge data. J. Appl. Meteor., 34, 1978-2007.
41. Stoelinga, M. T., 2005: Simulated equivalent reflectivity factor as currently formulated in RIP: Description and possible improvements. 5 pp. [Available online at http://www.atmos. washington.edu/;stoeling/RIP_sim_ref.pdf.]
42. Szeto, K. K., and H. Cho, 1994: A numerical investigation of squall lines. Part III: Sensitivity to precipitation processes and the Coriolis force. J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 1341-1351.
43. Szeto, K. K., and H. Cho, R. E. Stewart, and C. A. Lin, 1988: Mesoscale circulations forced by melting snow. Part II: Application to meteorological features. J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 1642-1605.
44. Tao, W. K., and J. Simpson, 1989: Modeling study of a tropical squall-type convective line. J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 177-202.
45. Tao, W. K., and J. Simpson, C. H. Sui, B. Ferrier, S. Lang, J. Scala, M. D. Chou, and K. Pickering, 1993: Heating, moisture, and water budgets of tropical and midlatitude squall lines: Comparisons and sensi-tivity to longwave radiation. J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 673-690.
46. Tao, W. K., and J. Simpson, C. H. Sui, B. Ferrier, S. Lang, J. Scala, M. D. Chou, and K. Pickering, and Coauthors, 2003: Microphysics, radiation, and surface processes in the Goddard Cumulus Ensemble (GCE) model. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 82, 97-137.
47. van den Heever, S. C., and W. R. Cotton, 2004: The impact of hail size on simulated supercell storms. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1596- 1609.
48. van Weverberg, K., N. P. M. van Lipzig, and L. Delobbe, 2011a: Evaluation of moist processes during intense precipitation in km-scale NWP models using remote sensing and in-situ data: Impact of microphysics size distribution assumptions. Atmos. Res., 99, 15-38.
49. van Weverberg, K., N. P. M. van Lipzig, and L. Delobbe, 2011b: The impact of size distribution as-sumptions in a bulk one-moment microphysics scheme on simulated surface precipitation and storm dynamics during a low-topped supercell case in Belgium. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 1131-1147.
50. van Weverberg, K., N. P. M. van Lipzig, and L. Delobbe, A. M. Vogelmann, H. Morrison, and J. Milbrandt, 2012: Sensitivity of idealized squall-line simulations to the level of complexity used in two-moment bulk microphysics schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 1883-1907.
51. Ward, D., and W. Cotton, 2011: A method for forecasting cloud condensation nuclei using predictions of aerosol physical and chemical properties from WRF/Chem. J. Appl. Meteor. Cli-matol., 50, 1601-1615.
52. Weisman, M. L., 1993: The genesis of severe long-lived bow echoes. J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 645-670.
53. Weisman, M. L., W. C. Skamarcok, and J. B. Klemp, 1997: The resolution dependence of explicitly modeled convective systems. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125, 527-548.
54. Yang, M. J., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1995: Sensitivity of squall-line rear inflow to ice microphysics and environmental humidity. Mon. Wea. Rev., 123, 3175-3193.