Some practical considerations regarding horizontal resolution in the first generation of operational convection-allowing NWP

Weather and Forecasting

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 931-952

  Kain, John S ^a   Weiss, Steven J ^b   Bright, David R ^b   Baldwin, Michael E ^c   Levit, Jason J ^b   Carbin, Gregory W ^b   Schwartz, Craig S ^d   Weisman, Morris L ^e   Droegemeier, Kelvin K ^d   Weber, Daniel B ^d   Thomas, Kevin W ^d  

^a NATIONAL SEVERE STORMS LABORATORY   (United States)

^b NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^e NATIONAL CENTER FOR ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDED VALUES; ADVANCED RESEARCHES; COMPUTATIONAL EXPENSE; CONVECTIVE ACTIVITIES; DATA SETS; DIURNAL CYCLES; FORECAST SENSITIVITIES; GRID-SPACINGS; HIGH RESOLUTIONS; HORIZONTAL GRID SPACINGS; HORIZONTAL RESOLUTIONS; MESO-SCALE; MODEL CONFIGURATIONS; MODEL INITIALIZATIONS; OBJECTIVE METRICS; PARAMETERIZATIONS; SEVERE WEATHERS; SPATIAL RESOLUTIONS; TIME PERIODS; UPPER ENDS; VERTICAL RESOLUTIONS; VISUAL COMPARISONS; WEATHER RESEARCH AND FORECASTING;

EXPERIMENTS; IMAGE RESOLUTION; METEOROLOGICAL PROBLEMS; REFLECTION;

FORECASTING;

ATMOSPHERIC CONVECTION; BOUNDARY CONDITION; DATA SET; DIURNAL VARIATION; NUMERICAL METHOD; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; WEATHER FORECASTING;

EID: 60349094858     PISSN: 08828156     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/WAF2007106.1     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Adlerman, E. J., and K. K. Droegemeier, 2002: The sensitivity of numerically simulated cyclic mesocyclogenesis to variations in model physical and computational parameters. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 2671-2691.
2. Arakawa, A., 2004: The cumulus parameterization problem: Past, present, and future. J. Climate, 17, 2493-2525.
3. Baldwin, M. E., and K. E. Mitchell, 1998: Progress on the NCEP hourly multi-sensor U.S. precipitation analysis for operations and GCIP research. Preprints, Second Symp. on Integrated Observing Systems, Phoenix, AZ, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 10-11.
4. Baldwin, M. E., and M. S. Wandishin, 2002: Determining the resolved spatial scales of Eta model precipitation forecasts. Preprints, 15th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 85-88.
5. Baldwin, M. E., and J. S. Kain, 2006: Sensitivity of several performance measures to displacement error, bias, and event frequency. Wea. Forecasting, 21, 636-648.
6. Bélair, S., and J. Mailhot, 2001: Impact of horizontal resolution on the numerical simulation of a midlatitude squall line: Implicit versus explicit condensation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 2362-2376.
7. Black, T. L., 1994: The new NMC mesoscale Eta Model: Description and forecast examples. Wea. Forecasting, 9, 265-278.
8. Bryan, G. H., J. C. Wyngaard, and J. M. Fritsch, 2003: Resolution requirements for the simulation of deep moist convection. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 2394-2416.
9. Chen, F., K. W. Manning, D. N. Yates, M. A. LeMone, S. B. Trier, R. Cuenca, and D. Niyogi, 2004: Development of high resolution land data assimilation system and its application to WRF. Preprints, 16th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Seattle, WA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 22.3. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/ 67333.pdf.]
10. Davis, C., and Coauthors, 2004: The Bow Echo and MCV Experiment (BAMEX): Observations and opportunities. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 85, 1075-1093.
11. Deng, A., and D. R. Stauffer, 2006: On improving 4-km mesoscale model simulations. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 45, 361-381.
12. Done, J., C. Davis, and M. Weisman, 2004: The next generation of NWP: Explicit forecasts of convection using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. Atmos. Sci. Lett., 5 (6), 110-117.
13. Droegemeier, K. K., S. M. Lazarus, and R. P. Davies-Jones, 1993: The influence of helicity on numerically simulated convective storms. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 2005-2029.
14. Droegemeier, K. K., G. Bassett, and M. Xue, 1994: Very high-resolution, uniform-grid simulations of deep convection on a massively parallel processor: Implications for small-scale predictability. Preprints, 10th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Portland, OR, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 376-379.
15. Droegemeier, K. K., G. Bassett, D. K. Lilly, and M. Xue, 1996: Does helicity really play a role in supercell longevity? Preprints, 18th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, San Francisco, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 205-209.
16. Dudhia, J., 1989: Numerical study of convection observed during the Winter Monsoon Experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 3077-3107.
17. Gallus, W. A., Jr., and M. Segal, 2001: Impact of improved initialization of mesoscale features on convective system rainfall in 10-km Eta simulations. Wea. Forecasting, 16, 680-696.
18. Hong, S.-Y., J. Dudhia, and S.-H. Chen, 2004: A revised approach to ice-microphysical processes for the bulk parameterization of cloud and precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 103-120.
19. Iacono, M. J., E. J. Mlawer, S. A. Clough, and J.-J. Morcrette, 2000: Impact of an improved longwave radiation model, RRTM, on the energy budget and thermodynamic properties of the NCAR Community Climate Model, CCM3. J. Geophys. Res., 105, 14 873-14 890.
20. Janjić, Z. I., 1994: The step-mountain eta coordinate model: Further developments of the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbulence closure schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122, 927-945.
21. Janjić, Z. I., T. L. Black, M. Pyle, H.-Y. Chuang, E. Rogers, and G. DiMego, cited 2007: An evolutionary approach to non-hydrostatic modeling. [Available online at http://www.wrf-model.org/wrfadmin/ publications/Chuang_Janjic_NWP50yearsfinalshort.pdf.]
22. Johns, R. H., and C. A. Doswell III, 1992: Severe local storms forecasting. Wea. Forecasting, 7, 588-612.
23. Jung, J.-H., and A. Arakawa, 2004: The resolution dependence of model physics: Illustrations from nonhydrostatic model experiments. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 88-102.
24. Kain, J. S., M. E. Baldwin, S. J. Weiss, P. R. Janish, M. P. Kay, and G. Carbin, 2003a: Subjective verification of numerical models as a component of a broader interaction between research and operations. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 847-860.
25. Kain, J. S., P. R. Janish, S. J. Weiss, M. E. Baldwin, R. S. Schneider, and H. E. Brooks, 2003b: Collaboration between forecasters and research scientists at the NSSL and SPC: The Spring Program. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 84, 1797-1806.
26. Kain, J. S., S. J. Weiss, M. E. Baldwin, G. W. Carbin, D. A. Bright, J. J. Levit, and J. A. Hart, 2005: Evaluating high-resolution configurations of the WRF model that are used to forecast severe convective weather: The 2005 SPC/NSSL Spring Program. Preprints, 21th Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting/17th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Washington, DC, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 2A.5. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/94843.pdf.]
27. Kain, J. S., S. J. Weiss, J. J. Levit, M. E. Baldwin, and D. R. Bright, 2006: Examination of convection-allowing configurations of the WRF model for the prediction of severe convective weather: The SPC/NSSL Spring Program 2004. Wea. Forecasting, 21, 167-181.
28. Kalb, M. W., 1987: The role of convective parameterization in the simulation of a Gulf coast precipitation system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 115, 214-234.
29. Koch, S. E., B. Ferrier, M. Stolinga, E. Szoke, S. J. Weiss, and J. S. Kain, 2005: The use of simulated radar reflectivity fields in the diagnosis of mesoscale phenomena from high-resolution WRF model forecasts. Preprints, 12th Conf. on Mesoscale Processes, Albuquerque, NM, Amer. Meteor. Soc., J4J.7. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/97032.pdf.]
30. Lean, H. W., P. A. Clark, M. Dixon, N. M. Roberts, A. Fitch, R. Forbes, and C. Halliwell, 2008: Characteristics of high-resolution versions of the Met Office Unified Model for forecasting convection over the United Kingdom. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 3408-3424.
31. Lilly, D. K., G. M. Bassett, K. K. Droegemeier, and P. Bartello, 1998: Stratified turbulence in the atmospheric mesoscales. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 11, 139-153.
32. Liu, C., M. W. Moncrieff, and W. W. Grabowski, 2001: Explicit and parameterized realizations of convective cloud systems in TOGA COARE. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 1689-1703.
33. Mesinger, F., 1996: Improvements in quantitative precipitation forecasts with the Eta regional model at the National Centers for Environmental Prediction: The 48-km upgrade. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, 2637-2650.
34. Mlawer, E. J., S. J. Taubman, P. D. Brown, M. J. Iacono, and S. A. Clough, 1997: Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the long-wave. J. Geophys. Res., 102, 16 663-16 682.
35. Molinari, J. M., and M. Dudek, 1986: Implicit versus explicit convective heating in numerical weather prediction models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 114, 326-344.
36. Molinari, J. M., and M. Dudek, 1992: Parameterization of convective precipitation in mesoscale numerical models: A critical review. Mon. Wea. Rev., 120, 326-344.
37. Narita, M., and S. Ohmore, 2007: Improving precipitation forecasts by the operational nonhydrostatic mesoscale model with the Kain-Fritsch convective parameterization and cloud microphysics. Preprints, 12th Conf. on Mesoscale Processes, Watervillle Valley, NH, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 3.7. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/ 126017.pdf.]
38. Noh, Y., W. G. Cheon, S.-Y. Hong, and S. Raasch, 2003: Improvement of the K-profile model for the planetary boundary layer based on large eddy simulation data. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 107, 401-427.
39. Petch, J. C., 2006: Sensitivity studies of developing convection in a cloud-resolving model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 132, 345-358.
40. Petch, J. C., A. R. Brown, and M. E. B. Gray, 2002: The impact of horizontal resolution on the simulations of convective development over land. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128, 2031-2044.
41. Roberts, N. M., 2003: Results from high resolution modeling of convective events. U.K. Met Office Tech. Rep. 402, 47 pp. [Available online at http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/nwp/publications/papers/ technical_reports/2003/FRTR402/FRTR402.pdf.]
42. Roberts, N. M., 2005: An investigation of the ability of a storm scale configuration of the Met Office NWP model to predict flood-producing rainfall. U.K. Met Office Tech. Rep. 455, 80 pp. [Available online at http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/nwp/publications/papers/ technical_reports/2005/FRTR455/FRTR455.pdf.]
43. Rosenthal, S. L., 1978: Numerical simulation of tropical cyclone development with latent heat release by the resolvable scales. I: Model description and preliminary results. J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 258-271.
44. Seo, D. J., 1998: Real-time estimation of rainfall fields using radar rainfall and rain gauge data. J. Hydrol., 208, 37-52.
45. Skamarock, W. C., 2004: Evaluating mesoscale NWP models using kinetic energy spectra. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 3019-3032.
46. Skamarock, W. C., J. B. Klemp, J. Dudhia, D. O. Gill, D. M. Barker, W. Wang, and J. G. Powers, 2005: A description of the Advanced Research WRF version 2. NCAR Tech Note NCAR/TN-468+STR, 88 pp. [Available from UCAR Communications, P. O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307.]
47. Speer, M. S., and L. M. Leslie, 2002: The prediction of two cases of severe convection: Implications for forecast guidance. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 80, 165-174.
48. Steppeler, J., G. Doms, U. Schattler, H. W. Bitzer, A. Gassmann, and U. Damrath, 2003: Meso-gamma scale forecasts using the nonhydrostatic model LM. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 82, 75-96.
49. Stumpf, G. J., A. Witt, E. D. Mitchell, P. L. Spencer, J. T. Johnson, M. D. Eilts, K. W. Thomas, and D. W. Burgess, 1998: The National Severe Storms Laboratory Mesocyclone Detection Algorithm for the WSR-88D. Wea. Forecasting, 13, 304-326.
50. Weisman, M. L., and J. B. Klemp, 1984: The structure and classification of numerically simulated convective storms in directionally varying wind shears. Mon. Wea. Rev., 112, 2479-2498.
51. Weisman, M. L., W. C. Skamarock, and J. B. Klemp, 1997: The resolution dependence of explicitly modeled convective systems. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125, 527-548.
52. Weisman, M. L., C. Davis, W. Wang, K. W. Manning, and J. B. Klemp, 2008: Experiences with 0-36-h explicit convective forecasts with the WRF-ARW model. Wea. Forecasting, 23, 407-437.
53. Weiss, S. J., J. S. Kain, J. J. Levit, M. E. Baldwin, and D. R. Bright, 2004: Examination of several different versions of the WRF model for the prediction of severe convective weather: The SPC/NSSL Spring Program 2004. Preprints, 22nd Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Hyannis, MA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 17.1. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/ pdfpapers/82052.pdf.]
54. Zhang, D.-L., E.-Y. Hsie, and M. W. Moncrieff, 1988: A comparison of explicit and implicit prediction of convective and stratiform precipitating weather systems with a meso-β-scale numerical model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 114, 31-60.