Haptically guided robotic technology in total hip arthroplasty: A cadaveric investigation

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine

Volumn 227, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 302-309

  Nawabi, Danyal H ^a   Conditt, Michael A ^b   Ranawat, Amar S ^a   Dunbar, Nicholas J ^c   Jones, Jennifer ^b   Banks, Scott ^c   Padgett, Douglas E ^a  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

^b MAKO Surgical Corporation   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Haptics; Robotic assistance; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ACETABULAR COMPONENTS; CENTER OF ROTATION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HAPTICS; ROBOTIC TECHNOLOGIES; ROOT-MEAN-SQUARE ERRORS; TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY; BEARING MATERIALS;

ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; OPTIMIZATION; ROBOTICS; ELECTRIC ARC WELDING; ORTHOPEDICS; TOMOGRAPHY;

ARTHROPLASTY;

ACETABULUM; ARTICLE; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT; HIP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROBOTICS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOUCH;

ACETABULUM; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CADAVER; HIP; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TOUCH;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84877834394     PISSN: 09544119     EISSN: 20413033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0954411912468540     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Soderman P, Malchau H and Herberts P. Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: part I: general health evaluation in relation to definition of failure in the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 354-359.
2. Kim YH, Kim JS, Park JW, et al. Comparison of total hip replacement with and without cement in patients younger than 50 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93: 449-455.
3. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89(4): 780-785. (Pubitemid 46564282)
4. Phillips CB, Barrett JA, Losina E, et al. Incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection during the first six months after elective total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A(1): 20-26. (Pubitemid 36537968)
5. Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, et al. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91(1): 128-133.
6. Cram P, Lu X, Kaboli PJ, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of Medicare patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, 1991-2008. JAMA 2011; 305(15): 1560-1567.
7. Callanan MC, Jarrett B, Bragdon CR, et al. The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469(2): 319-329.
8. Wu G, Barrett JA, Losina E, et al. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion - part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. J Biomech 2002; 35(4): 543-548. (Pubitemid 34273649)
9. Tarwala R and Dorr LD. Robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty using the MAKO platform. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2011; 4(3): 151-156.
10. Schulz AP, Seide K, Queitsch C, et al. Results of total hip replacement using the Robodoc surgical assistant system: clinical outcome and evaluation of complications for 97 procedures. Int J Med Robot 2007; 3: 301-306. (Pubitemid 351218897)
11. Hammerberg EM, Wan Z, Dastane M, et al. Wear and range of motion of different femoral head sizes. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25: 839-843.
12. Padgett DE, Hendrix SL, Mologne TS, et al. Effectiveness of an acetabular positioning device in primary total hip arthroplasty. HSS J 2005; 1(1): 64-67.
13. Dorr LD, Malik A, Wan Z, et al. Precision and bias of imageless computer navigation and surgeon estimates for acetabular component position. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 465: 92-99. (Pubitemid 350306498)
14. Dorr LD, Wan Z, Malik A, et al. A comparison of surgeon estimation and computed tomographic measurement of femoral component anteversion in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91(11): 2598-2604.
15. Ranawat CS and Maynard MJ. Modern techniques of cemented total hip arthroplasty. Tech Orthop 1991; 6: 17-25.
16. Wines AP and McNicol D. Computed tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21: 696-701. (Pubitemid 44108578)
17. Renkawitz T, Haimerl M, Dohmen L, et al. Minimally invasive computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty, following the concept of femur first and combined anteversion: design of a blinded randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011; 12: 192.
18. Dastane M, Dorr LD, Tarwala R, et al. Hip offset in total hip arthroplasty; quantitative measurement with navigation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469: 429-436.
19. Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993; 75(2): 228-232. (Pubitemid 23087178)
20. Zhu J, Wan Z and Dorr LD. Quantification of pelvic tilt in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 571-575.