Minimally invasive computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty, following the concept of femur first and combined anteversion: Design of a blinded randomized controlled trial

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 12, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Renkawitz, Tobias ^a   Haimerl, Martin ^b   Dohmen, Lars ^b   Gneiting, Sabine ^b   Wegner, Melanie ^b   Ehret, Nicole ^b   Buchele, Claudia ^b   Schubert, Mario ^b   Lechler, Philipp ^a   Woerner, Michael ^a   Sendtner, Ernst ^a   Schuster, Tibor ^c   Ulm, Kurt ^c   Springorum, Robert ^a   Grifka, Joachim ^a  

^a Regensburg University Medical Center   (Germany)

^b BRAINLAB AG   (Germany)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTACT STRESS; FEMUR; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; LIMB DISEASE; MUSCLE FORCE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RANGE OF MOTION; SAMPLE SIZE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TRANSFUSION; WOUND HEALING; AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HIP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PATIENT POSITIONING; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROTATION;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT POSITIONING; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; ROTATION; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 80051799958     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-192     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Impingement with total hip replacement. Malik A, Maheshwari A, Dorr LD, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007 89 1832 1842 10.2106/JBJS.F.01313 17671025 (Pubitemid 47229894)
2. Containment versus impingement: finding a compromise for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty. Widmer KH, Int Orthop 2007 31 Suppl 1 29 33 17661036
3. Factors presdisposing to dislocation after primary total hip prosthesis. Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF, J Arthroplasty 2002 17 282 288 10.1054/arth.2002.30286 11938502 (Pubitemid 34290000)
4. Kinematics, kinetics, and finite element analysis of commonplace maneuvers at risk for total hip dislocation. Nadzadi ME, Pedersen DR, Yack HJ, Callaghan JJ, Brown TD, J Biomech 2003 36 577 591 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00232-4 12600348 (Pubitemid 36207588)
5. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. Barrack RL, J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2003 11 89 12670135
6. Effects of acetabular abduction on cup wear rates in total hip arthroplasty. Del Schutte H, Lipman AJ, Bannar SM, Livermore JT, Ilstrup D, Morrey BF, J Arthroplasty 1998 13 621 626 10.1016/S0883-5403(98)80003-X 9741436 (Pubitemid 28413588)
7. Computed tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty. Wines AP, McNicol D, J Arthroplasty 2006 21 696 701 10.1016/j.arth.2005.11.008 16877155 (Pubitemid 44108578)
8. Stem torsion in total hip replacement. Sendtner E, Tibor S, Winkler R, Wörner M, Grifka J, Renkawitz T, Acta Orthop 2010 5 579 582
9. Modern Techniques of Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty. Ranawat CS, Maynard MJ, Tech Orthopedics 1991 6 17 25 10.1097/00013611-199109000-00004
10. Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty. Dorr LD, Malik A, Dastane M, Wan Z, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009 1 119 127
11. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. Widmer KH, Zurfluh B, J Orthop Res 2004 22 815 821 10.1016/j.orthres. 2003.11.001 15183439 (Pubitemid 38756262)
12. Measuring leg length and offset with an imageless navigation system during total hip arthroplasty: is it really accurate? Renkawitz T, Schuster T, Herold T, Goessmann H, Sendtner E, Grifka J, Kalteis T, Int J Med Robot 2009 2 192 197
13. Computer-assisted cup placement techniques in total hip arthroplasty improve accuracy of placement. Jolles BM, Genoud P, Hoffmeyer P, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004 426 174 179 15346070 (Pubitemid 39167126)
14. Validation and usefulness of a computer-assisted cup-positioning system in total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, controlled study. Paratte S, Argenson JN, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007 89 494 499 10.2106/JBJS.F.00529 17332097 (Pubitemid 46365349)
15. Precision and bias of imageless computer navigation and surgeon estimates for acetabular component position. Dorr LD, Malik A, Wan Z, Long WT, Harris M, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007 465 92 99 17693877 (Pubitemid 350306498)
16. Computer-assisted total hip arthroplasty: coding the next generation of navigation systems for orthopedic surgery. Renkawitz T, Tingart M, Grifka J, Sendtner E, Kalteis T, Expert Rev Med Devices 2009 5 507 514
17. MicroHip: a minimally invasive procedure for total hip replacement surgery using a modified Smith-Peterson approach. Michel MC, Witschger P, Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2007 1 46 51 (Pubitemid 46890502)
18. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. Murray DW, J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993 75 228 232 8444942 (Pubitemid 23087178)
19. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR, J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978 60 217 220 641088 (Pubitemid 8311727)
20. Social support and health-related quality of life in hip and knee osteoarthritis. Ethgen O, Vanparijs P, Delhalle S, Rosant S, Bruyere O, Reginster JY, Qual Life Res 2004 13 321 330 15085904 (Pubitemid 38392260)
21. Development of outcome research for total joint arthroplasty. Lingard E, Hashimoto H, Sledge C, J Orthop Sci 2000 5 175 177 10.1007/s007760050146 10982653 (Pubitemid 30241775)
22. Translation, cross-cultural adaption, validity and reliability of the German version of the hip osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS). Blasimann A, Wood S, Bart Staal J, http://www.koos.nu/HOOSgerman.pdf
23. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. Harris WH, J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969 4 737 755
24. Self-administered satisfaction scale for joint replacement arthroplasty. Mahomed N, Sledge C, Daltroy L, Fossel A, Katz J, J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998 80 Suppl 1 9
25. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements. Yoshimine F, J Biomech 2006 39 1315 1323 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005. 03.008 15894324
26. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. D'Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, Walker RH, Colwell CW Jr, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000 3 315 321 (Pubitemid 30140332)
27. Proximal femoral tilt and its effect on range-of-motion. Haimerl M, Gneiting S, Dohmen L, Herzog A, Kramer S, Woerner M, Sendtner E, Renkawitz T, Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery: 17-19 June 2010; Paris Berlin: Pro Business, Davies B, Joskowicz L, Merloz P, 2010 300 303
28. Variation in Postoperative Pelvic Tilt May Confound the Accuracy of Hip Navigation Systems. Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Coleman-Wood K, Kaufman KR, Berry DJ, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009 467 43 49 10.1007/s11999-008-0521-z 18830796
29. The rationale for tilt-adjusted acetabular cup navigation. Babisch JW, Layher F, Amiot LP, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008 2 357 365 (Pubitemid 351341048)