Hip offset in total hip arthroplasty: Quantitative measurement with navigation

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 469, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 429-436

  Dastane, Manish ^a   Dorr, Lawrence D ^a   Tarwala, Rupesh ^a   Wan, Zhinian ^a  

^a GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANTHROPOMETRY; BONE NECROSIS; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; COXITIS; FEMALE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 78951474453     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1554-7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. I Asayama S Chamnongkich KJ Simpson TL Kinsey OM Mahoney 2005 Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty J Arthroplasty. 20 414 420 10.1016/j.arth.2004.01.016 16124955
2. RB Bourne CH Rorabeck 2002 Soft tissue balancing: The hip J Arthroplasty 17 Suppl 1 17 22 10.1054/arth.2002.33263 12068397
3. MN Charles RB Bourne JR Davey AS Greenwald BF Morrey CH Rorabeck 2004 Soft-tissue balancing of the hip: the role of femoral offset restoration J Bone Joint Surg Am. 86 1078 1088
4. P Dolhain H Tsigaras RB Bourne CH Rorabeck S Mac Donald R Mc Calden 2002 The effectiveness of dual offset stems in restoring offset during total hip replacement Acta Orthop Belg 68 490 499 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2FnsV2gtg%3D%3D 12584980
5. Dorr LD. Hip Arthroplasty: Minimally Invasive Techniques and Computer Navigation. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2005.
6. X Flecher S Parratte N Brassart JM Aubaniac JN Argenson 2008 Evaluation of the hip center in total hip arthroplasty for old development dysplasia J Arthroplasty. 23 1189 1196 10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.008 18534475
7. WH Harris 1969 Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation J Bone Joint Surg Am. 51 737 755 1:STN:280:DyaF1M3gtlWltQ%3D%3D 5783851
8. K Heaton LD Dorr 2002 Surgical release of iliopsoas tendon for groin pain after total hip arthroplasty J Arthroplasty. 17 779 781 10.1054/arth.2002.33570 12216034
9. RC Johnston RA Brand RD Crownenshield 1979 Reconstruction of the hip. A mathematical approach to determine optimum geometric relationships J Bone Joint Surg Am. 61 639 652 1:STN:280:DyaE1M3hs1CktQ%3D%3D 457709
10. T Karachalios G Hartofilakidis N Zacharakis M Tsekoura 1993 A 12-to 18-year radiographic follow-up study of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. The role of the center of rotation Clin Orthop Relat Res. 296 140 147 8222417
11. SP Krishnan RW Carrington S Mohiyaddin N Garlick 2006 Common misconceptions of normal hip joint relations on pelvic radiographs J Arthroplasty. 21 409 412 10.1016/j.arth.2005.10.021 16627151
12. WB Kurtz TM Ecker WM Reichmann SB Murphy 2010 Factors affecting bony impingement in hip arthroplasty J Arthroplasty. 25 624 634 10.1016/j.arth.2009. 03.024 19559561
13. NJ Little CA Busch JA Gallagher CH Rorabeck RB Bourne 2009 Acetabular polyethylene wear and acetabular inclination and femoral offset Clin Orthop Relat Res. 467 2895 2900 10.1007/s11999-009-0845-3 19412648
14. WT Long M Dastane MJ Harris Z Wan LD Dorr 2010 Failure of the Durom Metasul acetabular component Clin Orthop Relat Res. 468 400 405 10.1007/s11999-009-1071-8 19727987
15. JM Loughead D Chesney JP Holland AW McCaskie 2005 Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Br. 87 163 166 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7gs1emuw%3D%3D 10.1302/0301-620X.87B2.15151 15736735
16. A Malik A Maheshwari LD Dorr 2007 Impingement with total hip replacement J Bone Joint Surg Am. 89 1832 1842 10.2106/JBJS.F.01313 17671025
17. BJ McGrory BJ Morrey TD Cahalan KN An ME Cabanela 1995 Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Br. 77 865 869 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2FnslShuw%3D%3D 7593096
18. MW Pagnano AD Hanssen DG Lewallen WJ Shaughnessy 1996 Effect of superior placement of the acetabular component on the rate of loosening after total hip arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am. 78 1004 1014 1:STN:280:DyaK28zhslGgtg%3D%3D 8698717
19. CS Ranawat LD Dorr AE Inglis 1980 Total hip arthroplasty in protusio acetabuli of rheumatoid arthritis J Bone Joint Surg Am. 62 1059 1065 1:STN:280:DyaL3M%2FkslSjtA%3D%3D 7430191
20. CS Ranawat RR Rao JA Rodriguez HS Bhende 2001 Correction of limb-length inequality during total hip arthroplasty J Arthroplasty. 16 715 720 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvpvVWkuw%3D%3D 10.1054/arth.2001.24442 11547369
21. CS Ranawat JA Rodriguez 1997 Functional leg-length inequality following total hip arthroplasty J Arthroplasty. 12 359 364 1:STN:280:DyaK2szjvVOmsg%3D%3D 10.1016/S0883-5403(97)90190-X 9195310
22. T Renkawitz T Schuster T Herold H Goessmann E Sendtner J Grifka T Kalteis 2009 Measuring leg length and offset with an imageless navigation system during total hip arthroplasty: is it really accurate? Int J Med Robot. 5 192 197 19253907
23. Resnick D. Bone and Joint Imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2005.
24. DP Sakalkale PF Sharkey K Eng WJ Hozack RH Rothman 2001 Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res. 388 125 134 10.1097/00003086-200107000-00019 11451111
25. Silva, M, Lee KH, Heisel C, Dela Rosa MS, Schmalzried TP. The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:40-60.
26. AA Stans MW Pagnano WJ Shaughnessy AD Hanssen 1998 Results of total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type III developmental hip dysplasia Clin Orthop Relat Res. 348 149 157 10.1097/00003086-199803000-00024 9553547
27. N Sugano PC Noble E Kamaric 1999 Predicting the position of the femoral head center J Arthroplasty. 14 102 107 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7isVWmsw%3D%3D 10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90210-3 9926961
28. SA Yoder RA Brand DR Pedersen TW O'Gorman 1988 Total hip acetabular component position affects component loosening rates Clin Orthop Relat Res. 228 79 87 3342591