Robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty using the MAKO platform

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 151-156

  Tarwala, Rupesh ^a   Dorr, Lawrence D ^a  

^a GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

MAKO platform; Navigation; Robot; Robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty; Technique; THR

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; HUMAN; INCISION; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 80054998434     PISSN: 1935973X     EISSN: 19359748     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12178-011-9086-7     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Kim YH, Kim JS, Park JW, Joo JH. Comparison of total hip replacement with and without cement in patients younger than 50 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg [B]. 2011;93B:449-55.
2. Callaghan JJ, Forest EE, Olejniczak JP, Goetz DD, Johnston RC. Charnley total hip arthroplasty in patients less than 50 years old; a 20-25 year follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80- A:704-14.
3. Malik A, Maheshwari A, Dorr LD. Impingement with total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(8):1832-42. (Pubitemid 47229894)
4. Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(1):128-33. This study showed that hip instability and mechanical loosening are most common causes for revision total hip arthroplasty.
5. Cram P, Lu X, Kaboli PJ, Vaughan-Sarrazin MS, Cai X, Wolf BR, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of Medicare patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. JAMA. 2011;305(15):1560-7.
6. Callanan MC, Jarrett B, Bragdon CR, Zurakowski D, Rubash HE, Freiberg AA, et al. Risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:319-29. This study showed the factors correlated with cup malpositioning and has commented that navigation assistance increases the accuracy of cup position.
7. Epstein NJ, Woolson ST, Jiori NJ. Acetabular component positioning using the transverse acetabular ligament: can you find it and does it help? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:412-6
8. Jewett BA, Collis DK. High complication rate with anterior total hip arthroplasties on a fracture table. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:503-7.
9. Hammerberg EM, Wan Z, Dastane M, Dorr LD. Wear and range of motion of different femoral head sizes. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:839-43.
10. Hart AJ, Ilo K, Underwood R, Cann P, Henckel J, Lewis A, et al. The relationship between the angle of version and rate of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;93-B:315-20.
11. Harris WH. The correlation between minor or unrecognized developmental deformities and the development of osteoarthritis of the hip. Instr Course Lect. 2009;58:257-9.
12. Lazennec JY, Boyer P, Gorin M, Catone Y, Rosseau MA. Acetabular anteversion with CT in supine, simulated standing, and sitting positions in a THA patient population. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:1103-9.
13. Dorr LD, Wan Z, Malik A, Zhu J, Dastane M, Deshmane P. A comparison of surgeon estimation and computer tomographic measurement of femoral component anteversion in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(11):2598-604. This study showed that even the experience surgeon has poor precision for estimation of stem anteversion and concluded that intraoperative use of computer is important for achieving safe combined anteversion.
14. Zhu J, Wan Z, Dorr LD. Quantification of pelvic tilt in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(2):571-5. This study showed that quantitative knowledge of pelvic tilt is important in operating room for accurate cup position especially allowing anteversion to be measured in coronal plane.
15. Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75(2):228-32. (Pubitemid 23087178)
16. Dorr LD, Malik A, Dastane M, Wan Z. Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(1):119-27.
17. Little NJ, Busch CA, Gallagher JA, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Acetabular polyethylene wear and acetabular inclination and femoral offset. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;67:2895-900. This study showed that proper cup position and femoral offset restoration to normal are important for reduced polyethylene wear rate.
18. Sakalkale DP, Sharkey PF, Eng K, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:125-34 (Pubitemid 32595015)
19. Dastane M, Dorr LD, Tarwala R, Wan Z. Hip offset in total hip arthroplasty: quantitative measurement with navigation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:429-36.