Physical Responses of Bacterial Chemoreceptors

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 366, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1416-1423

  Vaknin, Ady ^a,b   Berg, Howard C ^a,b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

chemotaxis; fluorescence polarization; fluorescence resonance energy transfer; membrane proteins; receptors

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; DIMER; OLIGOMER; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE; POLYMER;

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CELL; CHEMORECEPTOR; CHEMOTAXIS; DISSOCIATION CONSTANT; ENERGY TRANSFER; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FLUORESCENCE; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); ESCHERICHIA COLI;

EID: 33846807515     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.12.024     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Germain R.N., and Stefanova I. The dynamics of T cell receptor signaling: complex orchestration and the key roles of tempo and cooperation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 17 (1999) 467-522
2. Agnati L.F., Ferre S., Lluis C., Franco R., and Fuxe K. Molecular mechanisms and therapeutical implications of intramembrane receptor/receptor interactions among heptahelical receptors with examples from the striatopallidal GABA neurons. Pharmacol. Rev. 55 (2003) 509-550
3. Bray D., and Duke T. Conformational spread: the propagation of allosteric states in large multiprotein complexes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Structure 33 (2004) 53-73
4. Milligan D.L., and Koshland Jr. D.E. Establishing the dimeric structure of the aspartate receptor of bacterial chemotaxis. J. Biol. Chem. 263 (1988) 6268-6275
5. Kim K.K., Yokota H., and Kim S.-H. Four-helical-bundle structure of the cytoplasmic domain of a serine chemotaxis receptor. Nature 400 (1999) 787-792
6. Ames P., Studdert C.A., Reiser R.H., and Parkinson J.S. Collaborative signaling by mixed chemoreceptor teams in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99 (2002) 7060-7065
7. Studdert C.A., and Parkinson J.S. Crosslinking snapshots of bacterial chemoreceptor squads. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101 (2004) 2117-2122
8. Parkinson J.S., Ames P., and Studdert C.A. Collaborative signaling by bacterial chemoreceptors. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 8 (2005) 116-121
9. Ames P., and Parkinson J.S. Conformational suppression of inter-receptor signaling defects. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103 (2006) 9292-9297
10. Sourjik V., and Berg H.C. Localization of components of the chemotaxis machinery of Escherichia coli using fluorescent protein fusions. Mol. Microbiol. 37 (2000) 740-751
11. Maddock J.R., and Shapiro L. Polar location of the chemoreceptor complex in the Escherichia coli cell. Science 259 (1993) 1717-1723
12. Bray D., Levin M.D., and Morton-Firth C.J. Receptor clustering as a cellular mechanism to control sensitivity. Nature 393 (1998) 85-88
13. Sourjik V. Receptor clustering and signal processing in E. coli chemotaxis. Trends Microbiol. 12 (2004) 569-576
14. Li G., and Weis R.M. Covalent modification regulates ligand binding to receptor complexes in the chemosensory system of Escherichia coli. Cell 100 (2000) 357-365
15. Levit M.N., and Stock J.B. Receptor methylation controls the magnitude of stimulus-response coupling in bacterial chemotaxis. J. Biol. Chem. 277 (2002) 36760-36765
16. Sourjik V., and Berg H.C. Receptor sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99 (2002) 123-127
17. Sourjik V., and Berg H.C. Functional interactions between receptors in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 428 (2004) 437-441
18. Shi Y., and Duke T. Cooperative model of bacterial sensing. Phys. Rev. E 58 (1998) 6399
19. Duke T.A.J., and Bray D. Heightened sensitivity of a lattice of membrane receptors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999) 10104-10108
20. Mello B.A., and Tu Y. Quantitative modeling of sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis: the role of coupling among different chemoreceptor species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100 (2003) 8223-8228
21. Shimizu T.S., Aksenov S.V., and Bray D. A spatially extended stochastic model of the bacterial chemotaxis signalling pathway. J. Mol. Biol. 329 (2003) 291-309
22. Albert R., Chiu Y.-w., and Othmer H.G. Dynamic receptor team formation can explain the high signal transduction gain in Escherichia coli. Biophys. J. 86 (2004) 2650-2659
23. Mello B.A., Shaw L., and Tu Y. Effects of receptor interaction in bacterial chemotaxis. Biophys. J. 87 (2004) 1578-1595
24. Rao C.V., Frenklach M., and Arkin A.P. An allosteric model for transmembrane signaling in bacterial chemotaxis. J. Mol. Biol. 343 (2004) 291-303
25. Mello B.A., and Tu Y. An allosteric model for heterogeneous receptor complexes: understanding bacterial chemotaxis responses to multiple stimuli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102 (2005) 17354-17359
26. Keymer J.E., Endres R.G., Skoge M., Meir Y., and Wingreen N.S. Chemosensing in Escherichia coli: two regimes of two-state receptors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103 (2006) 1786-1791
27. Skoge M.L., Endres R.G., and Wingreen N.S. Receptor-receptor coupling in bacterial chemotaxis: evidence for strongly coupled clusters. Biophys. J. 90 (2006) 4317-4326
28. Vaknin A., and Berg H.C. Osmotic stress mechanically perturbs chemoreceptors in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103 (2006) 592-596
29. Bornhorst J.A., and Falke J.J. Evidence that both ligand binding and covalent adaptation drive a two-state equilibrium in the aspartate receptor signaling complex. J. Gen. Physiol. 118 (2001) 639-710
30. Asakura S., and Honda H. Two-state model for bacterial chemoreceptor proteins: the role of multiple methylation. J. Mol. Biol. 176 (1984) 349-367
31. Barkai N., and Leibler S. Robustness in simple biochemical networks. Nature 387 (1997) 913-917
32. Pina K., Navarro C., McWalter L., Boxer D.H., Price N.C., Kelly S.M., et al. Purification and characterization of the periplasmic nickel-binding protein NikA of Escherichia coli K12. Eur. J. Biochem. 227 (1995) 857-865
33. Draheim R.R., Bormans A.F., Lai R.-Z., and Manson M.D. Tryptophan residues flanking the second transmembrane helix (TM2) set the signaling state of the Tar chemoreceptor. Biochemistry 44 (2005) 1268-1277
34. Mingshan L., and Hazelbauer G.L. Adaptational assistance in clusters of bacterial chemoreceptors. Mol. Microbiol. 56 (2005) 1617-1626
35. Antommattei F.M., Munzner J.B., and Weis R.M. Ligand-specific activation of Escherichia coli chemoreceptor transmethylation. J. Bacteriol. 186 (2004) 7556-7563
36. Falke J.J., and Hazelbauer G.L. Transmembrane signaling in bacterial chemoreceptors. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26 (2001) 257-265
37. Hulko M., Berndt F., Gruber M., Linder J.U., Truffault V., Schultz A., et al. The HAMP domain structure implies helix rotation in transmembrane signaling. Cell 126 (2006) 929-940
38. Shimizu T.S., Le Novere N., Levin M.D., Beavil A.J., Sutton B.J., and Bray D. Molecular model of a lattice of signalling proteins involved in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature Cell Biol. 2 (2000) 792-796
39. Miller A.S., and Falke J.J. Side chains at the membrane-water interface modulate the signaling state of a transmembrane receptor. Biochemistry 43 (2004) 1763-1770
40. Irieda H., Homma M., Homma M., and Kawagishi I. Control of chemotactic signal gain via modulation of a pre-formed receptor array. J. Biol. Chem. 281 (2006) 23880-23886
41. Boldog T., Grimme S., Li M., Sligar S.G., and Hazelbauer G.L. Nanodiscs separate chemoreceptor oligomeric states and reveal their signaling properties. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103 (2006) 11509-11514
42. Kim S.-H., Wang W., and Kim K.K. Dynamic and clustering model of bacterial chemotaxis receptors: structural basis for signaling and high sensitivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99 (2002) 11611-11615
43. Zacharias D.A., Violin J.D., Newton A.C., and Tsien R.Y. Partitioning of lipid-modified monomeric GFPs into membrane microdomains of live cells. Science 296 (2002) 913-916