The outcomes of hip resurfacing compared to standard primary total hip arthroplasty in Men

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 14, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Issa, Kimona ^a   Palich, Amanda ^a   Tatevossian, Tiffany ^a   Kapadia, Bhaveen H ^a   Naziri, Qais ^a   Mont, Michael A ^a  

^a SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; REOPERATION; SURVIVAL; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMUR HEAD; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REOPERATION; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84877738934     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-161     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. Mont MA, Marker DR, Smith JM, Ulrich SD, McGrath MS, [Clinical Trial Comparative Study]. 2009 467 1 66 71 18841436
2. Kordas G, Baxter J, Parsons N, Costa ML, Krikler SJ, Minimum 5-year follow-up after Cormet hip resurfacing Hip international: the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy: A single surgeon series of 234 hips 2012
3. Modern metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. McGrory B, Barrack R, Lachiewicz PF, Schmalzried TP, Yates AJ Jr, Watters WC, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. [Review]. 2010 18 5 14 306
4. Comparison of functional results of hip resurfacing and total hip replacement: a review of the literature. The Orthopedic clinics of North America. Shimmin AJ, Bare JV, [Comparative Study Review]. 2011 42 2 51 143
5. Clinical outcome of the metal-on-metal hybrid Corin Cormet 2000 hip resurfacing system: an up to 11-year follow-up study. Gross TP, Liu F, Webb LA, J Arthroplasty. 2012 27 4 8 533 22608686
6. Comparison of bone removed during total hip arthroplasty with a resurfacing or conventional femoral component: a cadaveric study. Su EP, Sheehan M, Su SL, J Arthroplasty. [Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. 2010 25 2 9 325
7. Causes of early failure in a multicenter clinical trial of hip resurfacing. Kim PR, Beaule PE, Laflamme GY, Dunbar M, J Arthroplasty. [Multicenter Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. 2008 23 6 Suppl 1 9 44
8. Optimizing patient selection and outcomes with total hip resurfacing. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. Schmalzried TP, Silva M, de la Rosa MA, Choi ES, Fowble VA, [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. 2005 4 200 23656645
9. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB, The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume. 2005 Feb 87 2 167 170 10.1302/0301-620X.87B2.15030
10. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at 2 years followup. Vail TP, Mina CA, Yergler JD, Pietrobon R, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006 Dec 453 123 131
11. Resurfacing THA for patients younger than 50 year: results of 2- to 9-year followup. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. Amstutz HC, Ball ST, Le Duff MJ, Dorey FJ, [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't] 2007 64 159 23656645
12. Femoral neck fractures after metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing: a prospective cohort study. Marker DR, Seyler TM, Jinnah RH, Delanois RE, Ulrich SD, Mont MA, J Arthroplasty 2007 Oct 22 7 Suppl 3 66 71
13. Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing. Mont MA, Seyler TM, Ulrich SD, Beaule PE, Boyd HS, Grecula MJ, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007 Dec 465 63 70
14. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. Pollard TC, Baker RP, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC, The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume. [Comparative Study] 2006 88 5 592 600 10.1302/0301-620X.88B5.17354
15. Total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of patients with arthritis of the hip joint: single centre, parallel group, assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial. Costa ML, Achten J, Parsons NR, Edlin RP, Foguet P, Prakash U, BMJ 2012 344 2147 10.1136/bmj.e2147 22517930
16. The clinical and radiological outcomes of hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Smith TO, Nichols R, Donell ST, Hing CB, Acta orthopaedica. [Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review]. 2010 81 6 95 684 20175659
17. A randomised controlled trial of total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of young patients with arthritis of the hip joint. Achten J, Parsons NR, Edlin RP, Griffin DR, Costa ML, BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010 11 8 10.1186/1471-2474-11-8 20074324
18. The John Charnley Award: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Garbuz DS, Tanzer M, Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010 Feb 468 2 318 325 10.1007/s11999-009-1029-x
19. Resurfacing versus conventional total hip arthroplasty-review of comparative clinical and basic science studies. Marker DR, Strimbu K, McGrath MS, Zywiel MG, Mont MA, Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2009 67 2 120 127 19583538
20. Resurfacing matched to standard total hip arthroplasty by preoperative activity levels-a comparison of postoperative outcomes. Zywiel MG, Marker DR, McGrath MS, Delanois RE, Mont MA, Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases. [Comparative Study]. 2009 67 2 9 116
21. The outcomes of Cormet hip resurfacing compared to standard primary total hip arthroplasty. Costa CR, Johnson AJ, Naziri Q, Mont MA, Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases. [Comparative Study] 2011 69 1 5 12
22. Total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing arthroplasty in the very young patient. Shrader MW, Orthop Clin North Am 2012 Jul 43 3 359 367 10.1016/j.ocl.2012.05.005
23. Resurfacing arthroplasty for hip dysplasia: a prospective randomised study. Wang Q, Zhang XL, Chen YS, Shen H, Shao JJ, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012 Jun 94 6 768 773 10.1302/0301-620X.94B6.28522
24. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: short-term survivorship of 4,401 hips from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Seppanen M, Makela K, Virolainen P, Remes V, Pulkkinen P, Eskelinen A, Acta Orthop 2012 Jun 83 3 207 213 10.3109/17453674. 2012.693016
25. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty in inflammatory arthritis a 3- to 5-year follow-up study. Malhotra R, Kannan A, Kumar V, Nagaraj C, Marimuthu K, Khatri D, J Arthroplasty 2012 Jan 27 1 15 20 10.1016/j.arth.2011.02.016
26. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: moving toward sex-specific surgery? Keeney JA, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011 Dec 7 93 23 1431 e1432
27. Survival of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. van der Weegen W, Hoekstra HJ, Sijbesma T, Bos E, Schemitsch EH, Poolman RW, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011 Mar 93 3 298 306 10.1302/0301-620X.93B3.25594
28. Total hip arthroplasty in the very young patient. Polkowski GG, Callaghan JJ, Mont MA, Clohisy JC, J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2012 Aug 20 8 487 497 10.5435/JAAOS-20-08-487
29. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. Harris WH, The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume 1969 Jun 51 4 737 755
30. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. DeLee JG, Charnley J, Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976 121 20 32 991504
31. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC: "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. [Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.] 1979, 141:17-27.