Clinical Outcome of the Metal-on-Metal Hybrid Corin Cormet 2000 Hip Resurfacing System. An up to 11-Year Follow-Up Study.

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  Gross, Thomas P ^a   Liu, Fei ^a   Webb, Lee A ^a  

^a Midlands Orthopaedics   (United States)

Author keywords

Femoral failure; Hip arthroplasty; Hip resurfacing; Hybrid fixation; Learning curve

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FEMUR FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EID: 84858295188     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.019     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Buergi M.L., Walter W.L. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the Australian experience. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(7 Suppl 3):61.
2. Aldinger P.R., Jung A.W., Pritsch M., et al. Uncemented grit-blasted straight tapered titanium stems in patients younger than fifty-five years of age. Fifteen to twenty-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91:1432.
3. Eskelinen A., Paavolainen P., Helenius I., et al. Total hip arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis in younger patients: 2,557 replacements in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register followed for 0-24 years. Acta Orthop 2006, 77:853.
4. Dorr L.D., Takei G.K., Conaty J.P. Total hip arthroplasties in patients less than forty-five years old. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983, 65:474.
5. McAuley J.P., Szuszczewicz E.S., Young A., et al. Total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years and younger. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 418:119.
6. Delaunay C.P., Bonnomet F., Clavert P., et al. THA using metal-on-metal articulation in active patients younger than 50 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466:340.
7. Long W.T., Dorr L.D., Gendelman V. An American experience with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties: a 7-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19(8 Suppl 3):29.
8. Lewis P.M., Al-Belooshi A., Olsen M., et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing alumina ceramic-on-ceramic with ceramic-on-conventional polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010, 25:392.
9. Capello W.N., D'Antonio J.A., Feinberg J.R., et al. Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: update. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(7 Suppl):39.
10. Gross T.P., Fei L. Minimally invasive posterior approach for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Techniques in Orthopaedics 2010, 25:39.
11. Amstutz H.C., Le Duff M.J. Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(6 Suppl 1):36.
12. Gross T.P., Liu F. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with an uncemented femoral component. A seven-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(Suppl 3):32.
13. Amstutz H.C., Beaule P.E., Dorey F.J., et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A:28.
14. Shimmin A., Beaule P.E., Campbell P. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:637.
15. Hedley A.K., Clarke I.C., Kozinn S.C., et al. Porous ingrowth fixation of the femoral component in a canine surface replacement of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982, 300.
16. Amstutz H.C., Kabo M., Hermens K., et al. Porous surface replacement of the hip with chamfer cylinder design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987, 140.
17. Mont M.A., Seyler T.M., Ulrich S.D., et al. Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 465:63.
18. Nunley R.M., Zhu J., Brooks P.J., et al. The learning curve for adopting hip resurfacing among hip specialists. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468:382.
19. Ramakrishnan R., Jaffe W.L., Kennedy W.R. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing radiographic evaluation techniques. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:1099.
20. Stulberg B.N., Trier K.K., Naughton M., et al. Results and lessons learned from a United States hip resurfacing investigational device exemption trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(Suppl 3):21.
21. Back D.L., Dalziel R., Young D., et al. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005, 87:324.
22. McMinn D.J., Daniel J., Ziaee H., et al. Results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing dysplasia component in severe acetabular insufficiency: a six- to 9.6-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:715.
23. Newman M.A., Barker K.L., Pandit H., et al. Outcomes after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: could we achieve better function?. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008, 89:660.
24. Heilpern G.N., Shah N.N., Fordyce M.J. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:1137.
25. Aspenberg P., Herbertsson P. Periprosthetic bone resorption. Particles versus movement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996, 78:641.
26. Mann K.A., Bartel D.L., Wright T.M., et al. Mechanical characteristics of the stem-cement interface. J Orthop Res 1991, 9:798.
27. Janssen D., Mann K.A., Verdonschot N. Finite element simulation of cement-bone interface micromechanics: a comparison to experimental results. J Orthop Res 2009, 27:1312.
28. Clauss M., Luem M., Ochsner P.E., et al. Fixation and loosening of the cemented Muller straight stem: a long-term clinical and radiological review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91:1158.
29. Makela K., Eskelinen A., Pulkkinen P., et al. Cemented total hip replacement for primary osteoarthritis in patients aged 55 years or older: results of the 12 most common cemented implants followed for 25 years in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:1562.
30. Stauffer R.N. Ten-year follow-up study of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982, 64:983.
31. Pandit H., Glyn-Jones S., McLardy-Smith P., et al. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:847.
32. Devitt A., O'Sullivan T., Quinlan W. 16- to 25-year follow-up study of cemented arthroplasty of the hip in patients aged 50 years or younger. J Arthroplasty 1997, 12:479.
33. Steffen R.T., Pandit H.P., Palan J., et al. The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:436.
34. Hing C.B., Back D.L., Bailey M., et al. The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89:1431.