Designing industrial yeasts for the consolidated bioprocessing of starchy biomass to ethanol

Bioengineered

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Favaro, Lorenzo ^a   Jooste, Tania ^b   Basaglia, Marina ^a   Rose, Shaunita H ^b   Saayman, Maryna ^b   Görgens, Johann F ^b   Casella, Sergio ^a   van Zyl, Willem H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Bioethanol; Codon optimization; Consolidated bioprocessing; Industrial yeast; Raw starch; integration

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; AMYLASE; BIOETHANOL; ENDO 1, 4 BETA XYLANASE; STARCH; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ARTICLE; BIOMASS; BIOPROCESS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CODON OPTIMIZATION; CONSOLIDATED BIOPROCESSING; FERMENTATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INDUSTRIAL YEAST; INDUSTRY; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; NONHUMAN; RAW STARCH; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TRANSGENIC ORGANISM; YEAST; Δ-INTEGRATION;

BIOETHANOL; CODON OPTIMIZATION; CONSOLIDATED BIOPROCESSING; INDUSTRIAL YEAST; RAW STARCH; Δ-INTEGRATION;

BIOMASS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT; METABOLISM; METHODS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STARCH;

EID: 84877718120     PISSN: 19491018     EISSN: 19491026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/bioe.22268     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Hamelinck CN, Van Hooijdonk G, Faaij APC. Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno economic performance in short-, middle-and long-term. Biomass Bioenergy 2005; 28:384-410; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.09.002.
2. Balat M, Balat H. Recent trends in global production and utilization of bioethanol fuel. Appl Energy 2009; 86:2273-82; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy. 2009.03.015.
3. Rumbold K, van Buijsen HJJ, Gray VM, van Groenestijn JW, Overkamp KM, Slomp RS, et al. Microbial renewable feedstock utilization: a substrate-oriented approach. Bioeng Bugs 2010; 1:359-66; PMID:21326838; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/bbug.1.5.12389.
4. Weber C, Farwick A, Benisch F, Brat D, Dietz H, Subtil T, et al. Trends and challenges in the microbial production of lignocellulosic bioalcohol fuels. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010; 87:1303-15; PMID:20535464; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2707-z.
5. Oreb M, Dietz H, Farwick A, Boles E. Novel strategies to improve co-fermentation of pentoses with D-glucose by recombinant yeast strains in lignocellulosic hydrolysates. Bioengineered 2012; 3; PMID:22892590; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/bioe.21444.
6. Saha BC, Cotta MA. Ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass by recombinant Escherichia coli strain FBR5. Bioengineered 2012; 3; PMID:22705843.
7. Bothast RJ, Schlicher MA. Biotechnological processes for conversion of corn into ethanol. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2005; 67:19-25; PMID:15599517; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1819-8.
8. Kim S, Dale BE. Global potential bioethanol production from wasted crops and crop residues. Biomass Bioenergy 2004; 26:361-75; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.08.002.
9. Favaro L, Basaglia M, van Zyl WH, Casella S. Using an efficient fermenting yeast enhances ethanol production from unfiltered wheat bran hydrolysates. Appl Energy 2012; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy. 2012.05.059.
10. Favaro L, Basaglia M, Casella S. Processing wheat bran into ethanol using mild treatments and highly fermentative yeasts. Biomass Bioenergy 2012; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.07.001.
11. Fukuda H, Kondo A, Tamalampudi S. Bioenergy: sustainable fuels from biomass by yeast and fungal whole-cell biocatalysts. Biochem Eng J 2009; 44:2-12; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2008.11.016.
12. van Zyl WH, Lynd LR, den Haan R, McBride JE. Consolidated bioprocessing for bioethanol production using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 2007; 108:205-35; PMID:17846725; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/10_2007_061.
13. Favaro L, Basaglia M, Saayman M, Rose SH, van Zyl WH, Casella S. Engineering amylolytic yeasts for industrial bioethanol production. Chemical Engineering Transactions 2010; 20:97-102; http://dx.doi.org/10.3303/CET1020017.
14. Favaro L, Basaglia M, Trento A, Saayman M, Rose SH, van Zyl WH, et al. Development of raw starch hydrolysing yeasts for industrial bioethanol production. J Biotechnol 2010; 150(Supplement 1):142; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.08.371.
15. van Zyl WH, Bloom M, Viktor MJ. Engineering yeasts for raw starch conversion. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2012; 95:1377-88; PMID:22797599; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4248-0.
16. Khaw TS, Katakura Y, Koh J, Kondo A, Ueda M, Shioya S. Evaluation of performance of different surface-engineered yeast strains for direct ethanol production from raw starch. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2006; 70:573-9; PMID:16133340; http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s00253-005-0101-z.
17. Romanos MA, Scorer CA, Clare JJ. Foreign gene expression in yeast: a review. Yeast 1992; 8:423-88; PMID:1502852; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/yea.320080602.
18. Lee FWF, Da Silva NA. Improved efficiency and stability of multiple cloned gene insertions at the δ sequences of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1997; 48:339-45; PMID:9352677; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002530051059.
19. Favaro L, Basaglia M, Rose SH, Trento A, Saayman M, van Zyl WH, et al. δ-Integration technique and efficient heterologous expression in yeasts tailored for bioethanol production. Yeast 2011; 28:S36; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/yea.1863.
20. Favaro L, Jooste T, Basaglia M, Rose SH, Saayman M, Görgens JF, et al. Codon-optimized glucoamylase sGAI of Aspergillus awamori improves starch utilization in an industrial yeast. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2012; 95:957-68; PMID:22450569; http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s00253-012-4001-8.
21. Den Haan R, McBride JE, La Grange DC, Lynd LR, van Zyl WH. Functional expression of cellobiohydrolases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae towards one-step conversion of cellulose to ethanol. Enzyme Microb Technol 2007; 40:1291-9; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.09.022.
22. Goto M, Semimaru T, Furukawa K, Hayashida S. Analysis of the raw starch-binding domain by mutation of a glucoamylase from Aspergillus awamori var. kawachi expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 1994; 60:3926-30; PMID:7993082.
23. Goto M, Shinoda N, Oka T, Sameshima Y, Ekino K, Furukawa K. Thr/Ser-rich domain of Aspergillus glucoamylase is essential for secretion. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2004; 68:961-3; PMID:15118335; http://dx.doi.org/10.1271/bbb.68.961.
24. Fierobe HP, Clarke AJ, Tull D, Svensson B. Enzymatic properties of the cysteinesulfinic acid derivative of the catalytic-base mutant Glu400-->Cys of glucoamylase from Aspergillus awamori. Biochemistry 1998; 37:3753-9; PMID:9521694; http://dx.doi. org/10.1021/bi972232p.
25. Belshaw NJ, Williamson G. Specificity of the binding domain of glucoamylase 1. Eur J Biochem 1993; 211:717-24; PMID:7679638; http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17601.x.
26. Chen HM, Ford C, Reilly PJ. Substitution of asparagine residues in Aspergillus awamori glucoamylase by site-directed mutagenesis to eliminate N-glycosylation and inactivation by deamidation. Biochem J 1994; 301:275-81; PMID:8037681.
27. Nakamura Y, Kobayashi F, Ohnaga M, Sawada T. Alcohol fermentation of starch by a genetic recombinant yeast having glucoamylase activity. Biotechnol Bioeng 1997; 53:21-5; PMID:18629955; ht t p://d x. d o i. o r g/10.10 0 2/(S ICI)10 9 7-0290(19970105)53:1<21::AID-BIT4>3.0. CO;2-0.
28. Yamada R, Bito Y, Adachi T, Tanaka T, Ogino C, Fukuda H, et al. Efficient production of ethanol from raw starch by a mated diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae with integrated α-amylase and glucoamylase genes. Enzyme Microb Technol 2009; 44:344-9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2009.01.001.