Nanotechnology tools for antibacterial materials

Nanomedicine

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 807-821

  Rizzello, Loris ^a   Cingolani, Roberto ^a   Pompa, Pier Paolo ^a  

^a ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

bacterial adhesion; biofilm; nanotopography; silver nanocomposites

Indexed keywords

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; CELLULOSE; DIMETICONE; GELATIN; MACROGOL; NANOCOMPOSITE; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); POLYETHER; POLYMER; POLYURETHAN; SELF ASSEMBLED MONOLAYER; SILVER NANOPARTICLE;

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BACILLUS SUBTILIS; BACTERIAL COLONIZATION; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; BACTERIUM CONTAMINATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FLAGELLUM; GRAM NEGATIVE BACTERIUM; GRAM POSITIVE BACTERIUM; HYDROGEL; MARINE BACTERIUM; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NANOFABRICATION; NANOMEDICINE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; PSEUDOMONAS FLUORESCENS; REVIEW; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS; STREPTOCOCCUS PNEUMONIAE; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BACTERIA; BACTERIAL ADHESION; BACTERIAL INFECTIONS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; HUMANS; NANOSTRUCTURES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SILVER;

EID: 84877637985     PISSN: 17435889     EISSN: 17486963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/nnm.13.63     Document Type: Review

References (116)

1. Davey ME, O'Toole GA. Microbial biofilms: from ecology to molecular genetics. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 64(4), 847-867 (2000).
2. de Nys R, Steinberg PD. Linking marine biology and biotechnology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 13(3), 244-248 (2002).
3. Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2(2), 95-108 (2004).
4. Costerton JW, Montanaro L, Arciola CR. Bacterial communications in implant infections: a target for an intelligence war. Int. J. Artif. Organs 30(9), 757-763 (2007).
5. Callow ME, Callow JA. Substratum location and zoospore behavior in the fouling alga Enteromorpha. Biofouling 15(1-3), 49-56 (2000).
6. Qian PY, Lau SC, Dahms HU, Dobretsov S, Harder T. Marine biofilms as mediators of colonization by marine macroorganisms: implications for antifouling and aquaculture. Mar. Biotechnol. (NY) 9(4), 399-410 (2007).
7. Chew BH, Lange D. Ureteral stent symptoms and associated infections: a biomaterials perspective. Nat. Rev. Urol. 6(8), 440-448 (2009).
8. Flemming HC, Wingender J. The biofilm matrix. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8(9), 623-633 (2010).
9. Callow JA, Callow ME. Trends in the development of environmentally friendly fouling-resistant marine coatings. Nat. Commun. 2, 244 (2011).
10. Ma L, Conover M, Lu H et al. Assembly and development of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm matrix. PLoS Pathog. 5(3), e1000354 (2009).
11. Gotz F. Staphylococcus and biofilms. Mol. Microbiol. 43(6), 1367-1378 (2002).
12. Skillman LC, Sutherland IW, Jones MV. The role of exopolysaccharides in dual species biofilm development. J. Appl. Microbiol. 85(Suppl. 1), 13S-18S (1998).
13. Sutherland IW. The biofilm matrix - an immobilized but dynamic microbial environment. Trends Microbiol. 9(5), 222-227 (2001).
14. Sutherland IW. Exopolysaccharides in biofilms, flocks and related structures. Water Sci. Technol. 43(6), 77-86 (2001).
15. Donlan RM. Biofilms: microbial life on surfaces. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 8(9), 881-890 (2002).
16. Decho AW, Kawaguchi T. Confocal imaging of in situ natural microbial communities and their extracellular polymeric secretions using Nanoplast resin. Biotechniques 27(6), 1246-1252 (1999).
17. Flemming HCW. Encyclopedia of Environmental Microbiology. Wiley, NY, USA, 1223-1231 (2002).
18. Rasmussen B. Filamentous microfossils in a 3,235-million-year-old volcanogenic massive sulphide deposit. Nature 405(6787), 676-679 (2000).
19. Beloin C, Ghigo JM. Finding gene-expression patterns in bacterial biofilms. Trends Microbiol. 13(1), 16-19 (2005).
20. Schembri MA, Kjaergaard K, Klemm P. Global gene expression in Escherichia coli biofilms. Mol. Microbiol. 48(1), 253-267 (2003).
21. O'Toole G, Kaplan HB, Kolter R. Biofilm formation as microbial development. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 54, 49-79 (2000).
22. Sauer K. The genomics and proteomics of biofilm formation. Genome Biol. 4(6), 219 (2003).
23. Busscher HJ, Norde W, Sharma PK, van der Mei HC. Interfacial re-arrangement in initial microbial adhesion to surfaces. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 15(6), 510-517 (2010).
24. Ubbink J, Schar-Zammaretti P. Colloidal properties and specific interactions of bacterial surfaces. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 12(4-5), 263-270 (2007).
25. Crawford RJ, Webb HK, Truong VK, Hasan J, Ivanova EP. Surface topographical factors influencing bacterial attachment. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 179-182(0), 142-149 (2012).
26. Emerson, Bergstrom TS, Liu Y et al. Microscale correlation between surface chemistry, texture, and the adhesive strength of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Langmuir 22(26), 11311-11321 (2006).
27. Mackintosh EE, Patel JD, Marchant RE, Anderson JM. Effects of biomaterial surface chemistry on the adhesion and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis in vitro. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 78(4), 836-842 (2006).
28. Etienne O, Picart C, Taddei C et al. Multilayer polyelectrolyte films functionalized by insertion of defensin: a new approach to protection of implants from bacterial colonization. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 48(10), 3662-3669 (2004).
29. Kowalczuk D, Ginalska G, Golus J. Characterization of the developed antimicrobial urological catheters. Int. J. Pharm. 402(1-2), 175-183 (2010).
30. Parreira P, Magalhaes A, Goncalves IC et al. Effect of surface chemistry on bacterial adhesion, viability, and morphology. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 99(3), 344-353 (2011).
31. Andersson DI, Hughes D. Antibiotic resistance and its cost: is it possible to reverse resistance? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8(4), 260-271 (2010).
32. Levin BR, Rozen DE. Non-inherited antibiotic resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4(7), 556-562 (2004).
33. Schwaber MJ, De-Medina T, Carmeli Y. Epidemiological interpretation of antibiotic resistance studies - what are we missing? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2(12), 979-983 (2004).
34. Levy SB, Marshall B. Antibacterial resistance worldwide: causes, challenges and responses. Nat. Med. 10, 122-129 (2004).
35. Characklis WG. Bioengineering report: fouling biofilm development: a process analysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 23(9), 1923-1960 (1981).
36. Jendresen MD, Glantz PO, Baier RE, Eick JD. Microtopography and clinical adhesiveness of an acid etched tooth surface. An in-vivo study. Acta Odontol. Scand. 39(1), 47-53 (1981).
37. Skjørland KK, Hensten-Pettersen A, Ørsta-Vik D, Söderholm K-J. Tooth colored dental restorative materials: porosities and surface topography in relation to bacterial adhesion. Acta Odontol. Scand. 40(2), 113-120 (1982).
38. Absolom DR, Lamberti FV, Policova Z et al. Surface thermodynamics of bacterial adhesion. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 46(1), 90-97 (1983).
39. Jacobsen PH, Robinson PB. Basic techniques and materials for conservative dentistry. 2. Recent advances in restorative materials. J. Dent. 9(2), 95-100 (1981).
40. Razatos A, Ong YL, Sharma MM, Georgiou G. Molecular determinants of bacterial adhesion monitored by atomic force microscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95(19), 11059-11064 (1998).
41. Dai X, Schalek R, Xu Q. Staining and etching: a simple method to fabricate inorganic nanostructures from tissue slices. Adv. Mater. 24(3), 370-374 (2012).
42. Hatsuki R, Yamamoto T. Nanoscale etching and flattening of metals with ozone water. Nano Lett. 12(6), 3158-3161 (2012).
43. Naderi N, Hashim MR. A combination of electroless and electrochemical etching methods for enhancing the uniformity of porous silicon substrate for light detection application. Appl. Surf. Sci. 258(17), 6436-6440 (2012).
44. Bakker DP, Busscher HJ, Van Zanten J et al. Multiple linear regression analysis of bacterial deposition to polyurethane coatings after conditioning film formation in the marine environment. Microbiology 150(Pt 6), 1779-1784 (2004).
45. Whitehead KA, Colligon J, Verran J. Retention of microbial cells in substratum surface features of micrometer and sub-micrometer dimensions. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 41(2-3), 129-138 (2005).
46. Campoccia D, Montanaro L, Agheli H et al. Study of Staphylococcus aureus adhesion on a novel nanostructured surface by chemiluminometry. Int. J. Artif. Organs 29(6), 622-629 (2006).
47. Díaz C, Schilardi PL, Salvarezza RC, De Mele MF. Nano/microscale order affects the early stages of biofilm formation on metal surfaces. Langmuir 23(22), 11206-11210 (2007).
48. Edwards KJ, Rutenberg AD. Microbial response to surface microtopography: the role of metabolism in localized mineral dissolution. Chem. Geol. 180(1-4), 19-32 (2001).
49. Puckett SD, Taylor E, Raimondo T, Webster TJ. The relationship between the nanostructure of titanium surfaces and bacterial attachment. Biomaterials 31(4), 706-713 (2010).
50. Durmus NG, Taylor EN, Inci F et al. Fructose-enhanced reduction of bacterial growth on nanorough surfaces. Int. J. Nanomedicine 7, 537-545 (2012).
51. Mitik-Dineva N, Wang J, Mocanasu RC et al. Impact of nano-topography on bacterial attachment. Biotechnol. J. 3(4), 536-544 (2008).
52. Mitik-Dineva N, Wang J, Truong VK et al. Differences in colonization of five marine bacteria on two types of glass surfaces. Biofouling 25(7), 621-631 (2009).
53. Loo CY, Young PM, Lee WH et al. Superhydrophobic, nanotextured polyvinyl chloride films for delaying Pseudomonas aeruginosa attachment to intubation tubes and medical plastics. Acta Biomater. 8(5), 1881-1890 (2012).
54. Tang H, Cao T, Liang X et al. Influence of silicone surface roughness and hydrophobicity on adhesion and colonization of Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 88(2), 454-463 (2009).
55. Quirynen M, Van Der Mei HC, Bollen CML et al. The influence of surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque microbiology. An in vivo study on implants. J. Periodontol. 65(2), 162-167 (1994).
56. Sousa C, Teixeira P, Oliveira R. Influence of surface properties on the adhesion of Staphylococcus epidermidis to acrylic and silicone. Int. J. Biomater. 2009, 1-9 (2009).
57. Liu Y, Zhao Q. Influence of surface energy of modified surfaces on bacterial adhesion. Biophys. Chem. 117(1), 39-45 (2005).
58. Katsikogianni M, Amanatides E, Mataras D, Missirlis YF. Staphylococcus epidermidis adhesion to He, He/O(2) plasma treated PET films and aged materials: contributions of surface free energy and shear rate. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 65(2), 257-268 (2008).
59. Almaguer-Flores A, Olivares-Navarrete R, Wieland Met al. Influence of topography and hydrophilicity on initial oral biofilm formation on microstructured titanium surfaces in vitro. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 23(3), 301-307 (2012).
60. Anselme K, Davidson P, Popa AM et al. The interaction of cells and bacteria with surfaces structured at the nanometre scale. Acta Biomater. 6(10), 3824-3846 (2010).
61. Gentile F, Tirinato L, Battista E et al. Cells preferentially grow on rough substrates. Biomaterials 31(28), 7205-7212 (2010).
62. Ivanova EP, Pham DK, Wright JP, Nicolau DV. Detection of coccid forms of Sulfitobacter mediterraneus using atomic force microscopy. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 214(2), 177-181 (2002).
63. Tang J, Zhang Q, Zeng Q, Man SH. Preparation of large-area surface-enhanced Raman scattering active Ag and Ag/Au nanocomposite films. Appl. Phys. A doi:10.1007/s00339-013-7568-7568 (2013) (Epub ahead of print).
64. Leefmann T, Heim C, Siljeström S et al. Spectral characterization of ten cyclic lipids using time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 27(5), 565-581 (2013).
65. Vadillo-Rodriguez V, Logan BE. Localized attraction correlates with bacterial adhesion to glass and metal oxide substrata. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40(9), 2983-2988 (2006).
66. Popham DL, Young KD. Role of penicillin-binding proteins in bacterial cell morphogenesis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 6(6), 594-599 (2003).
67. Thanassi DG, Hultgren SJ. Multiple pathways allow protein secretion across the bacterial outer membrane. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12(4), 420-430 (2000).
68. Jefferson KK. What drives bacteria to produce a biofilm? FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 236(2), 163-173 (2004).
69. Smyth CJ, Marron MB, Twohig JM, Smith SG. Fimbrial adhesins: similarities and variations in structure and biogenesis. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 16(2), 127-139 (1996).
70. Rizzello L, Sorce B, Sabella S et al. Impact of nanoscale topography on genomics and proteomics of adherent bacteria. ACS Nano 5(3), 1865-1876 (2011).
71. Rizzello L, Galeone A, Vecchio G et al. Molecularresponse of Escherichia coli adheringonto nanoscale topography. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 7, 575 (2012).
72. Rizzello L, Shankar SS, Fragouli D et al. Microscale patterning of hydrophobic/hydrophilic surfaces by spatially controlled galvanic displacement reactions. Langmuir 25(11), 6019-6023 (2009).
73. Shankar SS, Rizzello L, Cingolani R, Rinaldi R, Pompa PP. Micro/nanoscale patterning of nanostructured metal substrates for plasmonic applications. ACS Nano 3(4), 893-900 (2009).
74. Blattler T, Huwiler C, Ochsner M et al. Nanopatterns with biological functions. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 6(8), 2237-2264 (2006).
75. Truskett VN, Watts MP. Trends in imprint lithography for biological applications. Trends Biotechnol. 24(7), 312-317 (2006).
76. Wood MA. Colloidal lithography and current fabrication techniques producing in-plane nanotopography for biological applications. J. R. Soc. Interface 4(12), 1-17 (2007).
77. Oh S, Brammer KS, Li YS et al. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106(7), 2130-2135 (2009).
78. Renault JP, Bernard A, Bietsch A et al. Fabricating arrays of single protein molecules on glass using microcontactprinting. J. Phys. Chem. B 107(3), 703-711 (2002).
79. Ginger DS, Zhang H, Mirkin CA. The evolution of dip-pen nanolithography. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 43(1), 30-45 (2004).
80. Hou S, Burton EA, Simon KA et al. Inhibition of Escherichia coli biofilm formation by self-assembled monolayers of functional alkanethiols on gold. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73(13), 4300-4307 (2007).
81. Hou S, Gu H, Smith C, Ren D. Microtopographicpatterns affect Escherichia coli biofilm formation on poly(dimethylsiloxane) surfaces. Langmuir 27(6), 2686-2691 (2011).
82. Hochbaum AI, Aizenberg J. Bacteria pattern spontaneously on periodic nanostructure arrays. Nano Lett. 10(9), 3717-3721 (2010).
83. Díaz C, Schilardi PL, Salvarezza RC, Fernandez Lorenzo De Mele M. Have flagella a preferred orientation during early stages of biofilm formation? AFM study using patterned substrates. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 82(2), 536-542 (2011).
84. Weibel DB, DiLuzio WR, Whitesides GM. Microfabrication meets microbiology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5, 209 (2007).
85. Scheuerman TR, Camper AK, Hamilton MA. Effects of substratum topography on bacterial adhesion. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 208(1), 23-33 (1998).
86. Liau SY, Read DC, Pugh WJ, Furr JR, Russell AD. Interaction of silver nitrate with readily identifiable groups: relationship to the antibacterial action of silver ions. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 25(4), 279-283 (1997).
87. Silver S. Bacterial silver resistance: molecular biology and uses and misuses of silver compounds. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 27(2-3), 341-353 (2003).
88. Klasen HJ. A historical review of the use of silver in the treatment of burns. II. Renewed interest for silver. Burns 26(2), 131-138 (2000).
89. Bajpai SK, Mohan YM, Bajpai M, Tankhiwale R, Thomas V. Synthesis of polymer stabilized silver and gold nanostructures. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 7(9), 2994-3010 (2007).
90. Kong H, Jang J. Antibacterial properties of novel poly(methyl methacrylate) nanofiber containing silver nanoparticles. Langmuir 24(5), 2051-2056 (2008).
91. Sharma VK, Yngard RA, Lin Y. Silver nanoparticles: green synthesis and their antimicrobial activities. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 145(1-2), 83-96 (2009).
92. Thomas V, Jayabalan M. A new generation of high flex life polyurethane urea for polymer heart valve - studies on in vivo biocompatibility and biodurability. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 89(1), 192-205 (2009).
93. Vimala K, Mohan YM, Sivudu KS et al. Fabrication of porous chitosan films impregnated with silver nanoparticles: a facile approach for superior antibacterial application. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 76(1), 248-258 (2010).
94. Juby KA, Dwivedi C, Kumar M et al. Silver nanoparticle-loaded PVA/gum acacia hydrogel: synthesis, characterization and antibacterial study. Carbohyd. Polym. 89(3), 906-913 (2012).
95. Vasilev K, Sah V, Anselme K et al. Tunable antibacterial coatings that support mammalian cell growth. Nano Lett. 10(1), 202-207 (2010).
96. Morones JR, Elechiguerra JL, Camacho A et al. The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 16(10), 2346-2353 (2005).
97. Sondi I, Salopek-Sondi B. Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: a case study on E. coli as a model for Gram-negative bacteria. J. Coll. Interf. Sci. 275(1), 177-182 (2004).
98. Lok CN, Ho CM, Chen R. Proteomic analysis of the mode of antibacterial action of silver nanoparticles. J. Proteome Res. 5(4), 916-924 (2006).
99. Xiu ZM, Zhang QB, Puppala HL, Colvin VL, Alvarez PJJ. Negligible particle-specific antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 12(8), 4271-4275 (2012).
100. Park HJ, Kim JY, Kim J et al. Silver-ion-mediated reactive oxygen species generation affecting bactericidal activity. Water Res. 43(4) 1027-1032 (2009).
101. Inoue Y, Hoshino M, Takahashi H et al. Bactericidal activity of Ag-zeolite mediated by reactive oxygen species under aerated conditions. J. Inorg. Biochem. 92(1), 37-42 (2002).
102. Le Pape H, Solano-Serena F, Contini P et al. Involvement of reactive oxygen species in the bactericidal activity of activated carbon fibre supporting silver: bactericidal activity of ACF(Ag) mediated by ROS. J. Inorg. Biochem. 98(6), 1054-1060 (2004).
103. Oertel G. Polyurethane Handbook: Chemistry, Raw Materials, Processing, Application, Properties. Hanser Gardner Publications, OH, USA (1994).
104. Shah MSAS, Nag M, Kalagara T, Singh S, Manorama SV. Silver on PEG-PU-TiO2 polymer nanocomposite films: an excellent system for antibacterial applications. Chem. Mater. 20(7), 2455-2460 (2008).
105. Melaiye A, Sun Z, Hindi K et al. Silver(I)-imidazole cyclophane gem-diol complexes encapsulated by electrospuntecophilicnanofibers: formation of nanosilver particles and antimicrobial activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127(7), 2285-2291 (2005).
106. Kaplan DL. Biopolymers from Renewable Resources. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, NY, USA (1998).
107. Fullenkamp DE, Rivera JG, Gong YK et al. Mussel-inspired silver-releasing antibacterial hydrogels. Biomaterials 33(15), 3783-3791 (2012).
108. Rattanaruengsrikul V, Pimpha N, Supaphol P. In vitro efficacy and toxicology evaluation of silver nanoparticle-loaded gelatin hydrogel pads as antibacterial wound dressings. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 124(2), 1668-1682 (2012).
109. Bayer IS, Fragouli D, Attanasio A et al. Water-repellent cellulose fiber networks with multifunctional properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 3(10), 4024-4031 (2011).
110. Nadagouda MN, Varma RS. Synthesis of thermally stable carboxymethyl cellulose/metal biodegradable nanocomposites for potential biological applications. Biomacromolecules 8(9), 2762-2767 (2007).
111. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A. Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 44(22), 3358-3393 (2005).
112. Czaja WK, Young DJ, Kawecki M, Brown RM. The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 8(1), 1-12 (2007).
113. Cranston ED, Gray DG. Morphological and optical characterization of polyelectrolyte multilayers incorporating nanocrystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules 7(9), 2522-2530 (2006).
114. Travan A, Pelillo C, Donati I et al. Non-cytotoxic silver nanoparticle-polysaccharide nanocomposites with antimicrobial activity. Biomacromolecules 10(6), 1429-1435 (2009).
115. Mayer C, Moritz R, Kirschner C et al. The role of intermolecular interactions: studies on model systems for bacterial biofilms. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 26(1), 3-16 (1999).
116. The Leptospirosis Information Center. www.leptospirosis.org