An analysis on communication theory and discipline

Scientometrics

Volumn 95, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 985-1002

  Chung, Chung Joo ^a   Barnett, George A ^b   Kim, Kitae ^c   Lackaff, Derek ^d  

^a Kyungpook National University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^d ELON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication discipline; Identity; Network analysis; Theory network

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877636311     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0869-4     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Anderson, J. A. (1996). Communication theory. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
2. Ayish, M. I. (2003). Beyond Western-oriented communication theories: a normative Arab-Islamic perspective. Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture, 10, 79-92.
3. Barge, J. K., & Craig, R. T. (2009). Practical theory in applied communication scholarship. In R. Frey & K. N. Cissna (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Applied Communication Research (pp. 55-78). New York: Routledge, NJ.
4. Barnett, G. A., & Danowski, J. A. (1992). The structure of communication: a network analysis of the International Communication Association. Human Communication Research, 19, 264-285.
5. Barnett, G. A., Huh, C., Kim, Y., & Park, H. W. (2011). Citations among communication journals and other disciplines: a network analysis. Scientometrics, 88, 449-469.
6. Berger, C. R., & Chaffee, S. H. (1987). The study of communication as a science. In C. R. Berger & S. H. Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of Communication Science (pp. 15-19). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Berger, C., & Chaffee, S. (1988). Bridging the communication gap. Human Communication Research, 15, 311-318.
8. Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2, 113-120.
9. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2005). Ucinet 6 for Windows. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
10. Chung, C., Lee, S., Barnett, G. A., & Kim, J. (2009). A comparative network analysis of KSJCS and ICA in the era of hybridization. Asian Journal of Communication, 19, 170-191.
11. Craig, R. T. (1993). Why are there so many communication theories? Journal of Communication, 43, 26-33.
12. Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9, 119-161.
13. Craig, R. T. (2003). Discursive origins of a communication discipline. Miami Beach, FL, USA: Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Communication Association.
14. D'Angelo, P. (2002). News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: a response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 52, 870-888.
15. Doerfel, M. L., & Barnett, G. A. (1999). A semantic network analysis of the International Communication Association. Human Communication Research, 25, 589-603.
16. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
17. Feeley, T. H. (2008). A bibliometric analysis of communication journals from 2002 to 2005. Human Communication Research, 34, 505-520.
18. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239.
19. Funkhouser, E. T. (1996). The evaluative use of citation analysis for communication journals. Human Communication Research, 22, 563-574.
20. Halloran, J. D. (1983). A case for critical eclecticism. Journal of Communication, 33, 270-278.
21. Hanneman, R., & Riddle, R. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside. Retrieved from http://faculty. ucr. edu/~hanneman.
22. Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (1999). Foundations of behavioral research (4th edn.). New York: Harcourt College Publishers.
23. Kim, H. J., & Barnett, G. A. (2008). Social network analysis using author co-citation data. Toronto, ON, Canada: Proceedings of the fourteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems.
24. Lee, S. J., & Barnett, G. A. (2006). The structural change in Communication between 1991 and 2005: A social and semantic network analysis of the International Communication Association. Dresden, Germany: Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Communication Association.
25. Levine, T. R. (2010). Ranking and trends in citation patterns of communication journals. Communication Education, 59, 41-51.
26. Leydesdorff, L. (1998). Theories of citation. Scientometrics, 43, 5-25.
27. Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2009). Encyclopedia of communication theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Matthes, J. (2007). Beyond accessibility? toward an on-line and memory-based model of framing effects. Communications, 32, 51-78.
29. Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. (2003). Theory of communication networks. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30. O'Sullivan, P. (1999). Bridging the mass-interpersonal divide. Human Communication Research, 25, 569-588.
31. Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Knowledge linkage structures in communication studies using citation analysis among communication journals. Scientometrics, 81, 157-175.
32. Reardon, K. K., & Rogers, E. M. (1988). Interpersonal versus mass media communication: a false dichotomy. Human Communication Research, 15, 284-303.
33. Rice, R. E., Borgman, C. L., & Reeves, R. (1988). Citation networks of communication journals, 1977-1985: cliques and positions, citations made and citations received. Human Communication Research, 15, 256-283.
34. Rogers, E. M. (1994). A history of communication study: a biographical approach. New York: Free Press.
35. Rogers, E. M., & Chaffee, S. H. (1983). Communication as an academic discipline: a dialogue. Journal of Communication, 33, 18-30.
36. Rogers, E. M., & Kincaid, D. L. (1981). Communication networks: toward a new paradigm for research. New York: Free Press.
37. Sarkar, J. (2002). Technological diffusion: alternative theories and historical evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12, 131-176.
38. Wiemann, J. M., Hawkins, R. P., & Pingree, S. (1988). Fragmentation in the field and the movement toward integration in communication science. Human Communication Research, 15, 304-310.
39. Woelfel, J., & Fink, E. L. (1980). The measurement of communication processes: Galileo theory and methods. New York: Academic.