A bibliometric analysis of communication journals from 2002 to 2005

Human Communication Research

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 505-520

  Feeley, Thomas Hugh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350238844     PISSN: 03603989     EISSN: 14682958     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00330.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adam, D. (2002). Citation analysis: The counting house. Nature, 415, 726-729.
2. Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, A. (1979). Dialectic of enlightenment. London: Verso.
3. Anseel, F., Duyck, W., & DeBaene, W. (2004). Journal impact factors and self-citations: Implications for psychology journals. American Psychologist, 59, 49-51.
4. Barnett, G. A., & Danowski, J. A. (1992). The structure of communication: A network analysis of the International Communication Association. Human Communication Research, 19, 264-285.
5. Berger, C. R., & Chaffee, S. H. (1988). On bridging the communication gap. Human Communication Research, 10, 311-318.
6. Borgatti, S., Everett, M., & Freeman, L. C. (1992). UCINET X: Network analysis software. Columbia, SC: Analytic Technologies.
7. Borgatti, S., Everett, M., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
8. Brody, S. (1995). Impact factor as the best operational measure of medical journals. Lancet, 346, 1300-1301.
9. Bunz, U. (2005). Publish or perish: A limited author analysis of ICA and NCA journals. Journal of Communication, 55, 703-720.
10. Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 1304-1312.
11. Cooper, H. M. (1989). Integrating research: A guide for literature reviews (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
12. Doerfel, M. L., & Barnett, G. A. (1999). A semantic network analysis of the International Communication Association. Human Communication Research, 25, 589-603.
13. Feeley, T. H. (2000). Testing a communication network model of employee turnover based on centrality. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28, 262-277.
14. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239.
15. Funkhouser, E. T. (1996). The evaluative use of citation analysis for communication journals. Human Communication Research, 22, 563-574.
16. Garfield, E. (1999). Journal impact factor: A brief review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 161, 979-980.
17. Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295, 90-93.
18. Gowrishankar, J., & Divakar, P. (1999). Sprucing up one's impact factor. Nature, 401, 321-322.
19. Hakanen, E. A. (2002). Lists as social grid: Ratings and rankings in everyday life. Social Semiotics, 12, 245-254.
20. Hickson, M., Stacks, D. W., & Bodon, J. (1999). The status of research productivity in communication: 1915-1995. Communication Monographs, 66, 178-197.
21. Hickson, M., Turner, J., & Bodon, J. (2003). Research productivity in communication: An analysis, 1996-2001. Communication Research Reports, 20, 308-319.
22. Krackhardt, D. R., & Porter, L. W. (1986). When friends leave: A structural analysis of the relationships between turnover and stayers' attitudes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 242-261.
23. Kurmis, A. P. (2003). Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 85, 2449-2454.
24. Lawrence, P. A. (2003). The politics of publication. Nature, 422, 259-261.
25. Linardi, P. M., Coelho, P. M., & Costa, H. M. (1996). The "impact factor" as a criterion for the quality of scientific production is relative, not absolute measure. Brazilian Journal Medical Biology Research, 29, 555-561.
26. Mossholder, K. W., Settoon, R. P., & Henagan, S. C. (2005). A relational perspective on turnover: Examining structural, attitudinal, and behavioral predictors. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 607-618.
27. Pudovkin, A. I., & Garfield, E. (2002). Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 1113-1119.
28. Reeves, B., & Borgman, C. L. (1983). A bibliometric evaluation of core journals in communication research. Human Communication Research, 10, 119-136.
29. Rice, R. E., Borgman, C. L., & Reeves, B. (1988). Citation networks of communication journals, 1977-1985: Cliques and positions, citations made and citations received. Human Communication Research, 15, 256-283.
30. Rogers, E. R., & Chaffee, S. H. (1983). Communication as an academic discipline: A dialogue. Journal of Communication, 33, 18-30.
31. Rogers, E. R., & Kincaid, D. L. (1981). Communication networks: Toward a new paradigm for research. New York: Free Press.
32. Saha, S., Saint, S., & Christakis, D. A. (2003). Impact factor: A valid measure of journal quality? Journal of Medical Library Association, 91, 42-46.
33. Schramm, W. (1997). The beginnings of communication study in America: A personal memoir. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314, 498-502.
35. Sieck, G. C. (2000). The "impact factor": What it means to the impact of applied physiology. Journal of Applied Physiology, 89, 865-866.
36. So, C. K. (1988). Citation patterns of core communication journals: An assessment of the developmental status of communication. Human Communication Research, 15, 236-255.
37. Stewart, T. D. (2002). Principles of research in communication. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
38. Traynor, M., & Rafferty, A. M. (2001). Bibliometrics and a culture of measurement. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 36, 167-168.
39. Van Fleet, D. D., McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2000). A theoretical and empirical analysis of journal rankings: The case of formal lists. Journal of Management, 26, 839-861.
40. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.